Comparison of methods assessing environmental friendliness of petrochemical process design

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 71, Issue , 2014, Pages 110-117

  Abbaszadeh, Sahar ^a   Hassim, Mimi H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Environmental assessment; Environmentally benign process; Hazard assessment; Petrochemical process; Process design

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; PETROCHEMICAL PLANTS; PETROCHEMICALS; STAGES; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WASTE TREATMENT;

CHEMICAL PROCESS DESIGN; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODS; ENVIRONMENTAL FRIENDLINESS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTALLY BENIGN PROCESS; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; PETROCHEMICAL PROCESS;

PROCESS DESIGN;

EID: 84899480909     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.011     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. I.K. Adu, H. Sugiyama, U. Fischer, and K. Hungerbuhler Comparisons of methods for assessing environmental, health and safety (EHS) hazards in early phases of chemical process design Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 86 2008 77 93 (Pubitemid 351915750)
2. G.K. Al-Sharrah, I. Alatiqi, A. Elkamel, and E. Alper Planning an integrated petrochemical industry with an environmental objective Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 40 2001 2013 2111
3. M.H. Archour, A.E. Haroun, C.J. Schult, and K.A.M. Gasem A new method to assess the environmental risk of a chemical process Chem. Eng. Process 44 8 2005 901 909
4. H. Cabezas, J.C. Bare, and S.K. Mallick Pollution prevention with chemical process simulators: the generalized waste reduction (WAR) algorithm-full version Comput. Chem. Eng 23 1999 623 634 (Pubitemid 29210320)
5. J.A. Cano-Ruiz, and G.J. MacRae Environmentally conscious chemical process design Annu. Rev. Energ. Environ. 23 1998 499 536 (Pubitemid 128556412)
6. D. Calamari, and M. Vighi Scientific Bases for the Assessment of Several Chemical Substances in Combination at Low Level 1993 EEC Luxembourg
7. S.R. Cave, and D.W. Edwards Chemical process route selection based in assessment of inherent environmental hazard Comput. Chem. Eng. 21 1997 S965 S970
8. H. Chen, and D.R. Shonnard Systematic framework for environmentally conscious chemical process design: early and detailed design stages Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43 2004 535 552 (Pubitemid 38090821)
9. l. Cucek, J.J. Klemes, and Z. Kravanja A review of footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability J. Clean. Prod. 34 2012 9 20
10. U. Diwekar, and Y. Shastri Design for environment: a state-of-the art review Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 13 2011 227 240
11. M. El-Halwaghi, E.M. Lovelady, A. Abdel-Wahab, P. Linke, and H.E. Alfadala Apply process integration to environmental impact assessment Chem. Eng. Prog 2009 36 42
12. L. Grundemann, J.C. Kuschnerow, T. Brinkmann, and S. Scholl Using ecological assessment during the conceptual design phase of chemical processes - a case study J. Hesselbach, C. Herrmann, Glocalized Solutions for Sustainability in Manufacturing 2011 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 617 622
13. M.Y. Gunasekera, and D.W. Edwards Estimating the environmental impact of catastrophic chemical release to the atmospheric and index method for ranking alternative chemical process route Process Safety Environ. Prot. 81 6 2003 463 474 (Pubitemid 351645102)
14. M.Y. Gunasekera, and D.W. Edwards Chemical process route selection based upon the potential toxic impact on the aquatic, terrestrial and atmospheric environments J. Loss Prevent. Proc. Ind 19 2006 60 69
15. M.H. Hassim, and M. Hurme Computer aided design of occupationally healthier processes Comput. Chem. Eng 25 2008 1119 1124
16. M.H. Hassim, and M. Hurme Inherent occupational health assessment during process research and development stage J. Loss Prevent. Proc. Ind. 23 2010 127 138
17. S. Hellweng, U. Fischer, M. Scheringer, and K. Hungerbuhler Environmental assessment of chemicals: methods and application to a case study of organic solvents Green Chem. 6 2004 418 427 (Pubitemid 39429337)
18. E.G. Hertwich, W.S. Pease, and T.E. McKone Evaluating toxic impact assessment methods: what works best? Environ. Sci. Technol. 32 5 1998 138 144
19. M. Hirao, H. Sugiyama, U. Fischer, and K. Hungerbühler IDEFO activity modeling for integrated process design considering environmental, health and safety (EHS) aspects Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 25 2008 1065 1070
20. ISO 14040 Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment- Principles and Framework 2006
21. ISO 14044 Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Requirements and Guidelines 2006
22. A. Jayswal, X. Li, A. Zanwar, H.H. Lou, and Y. Huang A sustainability root cause analysis methodology and its application Comput. Chem. Eng. 35 2011 2786 2798
23. X. Jia, F.Y. Han, and X.S. Tan Integrated environmental performance assessment of chemical processes Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 23 2004 243 247 (Pubitemid 39572069)
24. T.A. Kletz Plant Design for Safety: a User Friendly Approach 1991 Hemisphere Publishing Corporation New York
25. G. Koller, U. Fischer, and K. Hungerbuhler Assessing safety, health and environmental impact during early process development Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39 2000 960 972 (Pubitemid 30210638)
26. G. Koller, U. Fischer, and K. Hungerbuhler Comparisons of methods for assessing human health and environmental impact in early phases of chemical process development Comput. Aided Chem. Eng 8 2000 931 936
27. C. Li, X. Zhang, S. Zhang, and K. Suzuki Environmentally conscious design of chemical processes and products: multi-optimization method Chem. Eng. Res. Design 87 2009 233 243
28. M. Mackay, and S. Peterson Calculating fugacity Environ. Sci. Technol. 15 9 1981 1006 1014
29. A. Ouattara, P. Luc, A.P. Catherine, D. Serge, B. Philippe, and Y. Benjamin Economic and environmental strategies for process design Comput. Chem. Eng 36 2012 174 188
30. A.D. Patel, K. Meesters, H.D. Uil, E.,D. Jong, K. Blok, and M.K. Patel Sustainability assessment of novel chemical processes at early stage: application to biobased processes Energ. Environ. Sci. 5 2012 8430 8444
31. D.W. Peninngton, and P.L. Yue Option for the comparison of process design alternatives in the context of original toxicological impacts J. Cleaner Prod. 81 1 2000 1 8
32. C.J. Pereira Environmentally friendly processes Chem. Eng. Sci. 54 13-14 1999 1959 1973 (Pubitemid 29401062)
33. S. Shokravi, A.J.R. Smith, C.R. Burvill, and S. Maheswarajah Industrial environmental performance evaluation - comparison and sensitivity analysis Proceeding of 2012 International Congress on Environmental Modeling and Software, Managing Resource of a Limited Planet, Sixth Biennial Meeting, Leipzing, Germany 2012
34. D.R. Shonnard, and D.S. Hiew Comparative environmental assessment of VOC recovery and recycle design alternatives for gaseous waste streams Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 2000 5222 5228
35. H. Sugiyama, U. Fischer, M. Hirao, and K. Hungerbuhler A chemical process design framework including different stages of environmental, health and safety (EHS) assessment Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 21 2006 1021 1026
36. M.B. Swanson, G.A. David, L.E. Kincaid, T.W. Schultz, J.E. Bartmess, S.L. Jones, and E.L. George A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16 2 1997 372 383 (Pubitemid 27113559)
37. C.M. Torres, M.A. Gadalla, J.M. Mateo-sanz, and L.J. Esteller Evaluation tool for the environmental design of chemical processes Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50 2011 13466 13477
38. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Sustainable Development) Our Common Future (The Brundtland Report) 1987 Oxford University Press Oxford. Bungay, Suffolk, UK
39. X. Zhang, C. Li, C. Fu, and S. Zhang Environmental impact assessment of chemical process using the green method Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 2008 1085 1094
40. K. Zheng, H.H. Lou, P. Gangadharan, and K. Kanchi Incorporating sustainability into the conceptual design of chemical process-reaction route selection Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51 2012 9300 9309