Developing a checklist for research proposals to help describe health service interventions in UK research programmes: A mixed methods study

Health Research Policy and Systems

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Dorling, Hannah ^a   White, Donna ^a   Turner, Sheila ^a   Campbell, Kevin ^a   Lamont, Tara ^a  

^a The National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London in partnership with UK Health Security Agency   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FUNDING; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HOSPITAL PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; LEADERSHIP; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NURSE; PATIENT SAFETY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SCIENTIST; UNITED KINGDOM; CHECKLIST; HEALTH SERVICE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; SAMPLING;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHECKLIST; FEEDBACK; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; PILOT PROJECTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 84899480464     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14784505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-12     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. National Institute for Health Research HS&DR Programme Remit. [http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hsdr/remit], National Institute for Health Research.
2. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008, 337:a1655. 10.1136/bmj.a1655, 2769032, 18824488.
3. Medical Research Council Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance. [http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC004871], Medical Research Council.
4. Wells M, Williams B, Treweek S, Coyle J, Taylor J. Intervention description is not enough: evidence from an in-depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions. Trials 2012, 13:1-17. 10.1186/1745-6215-13-1, 3261086, 22214287.
5. Stevens DP, Shojania KG. Tell me about the context, and more. BMJ Qual Saf 2011, 20:557-559. 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000206, 21685496.
6. Taylor SL, Dy S, Foy R, Hempel S, McDonald KM, Ovretveit J, Pronovost PJ, Rubenstein LV, Wachter RM, Shekelle PG. What context features might be important determinants of the effectiveness of patient safety practice interventions?. BMJ Qual Saf 2011, 20:611-617. 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.049379, 21617166.
7. Bosk CL, Dixon-Woods M, Goeschel CA, Pronovost PJ. Reality check for checklists. Lancet 2009, 374:444-445. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61440-9, 19681190.
8. Schulz K, Altman D, Moher D, . CONSORT Group CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Medicine 2010, 8:18. 10.1186/1741-7015-8-18, 2860339, 20334633, CONSORT Group.
9. Davidoff F, Batalden P, Stevens D, Ogrinc G, Mooney S. Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project. Qual Saf Health Care 2008, 17:i3-i9. 10.1136/qshc.2008.029066, 2773518, 18836063.
10. Shepperd S, Lewin S, Straus S, Clarke M, Eccles MP, Fitzpatrick R, Wong G, Sheikh A. Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions?. PLoS Med 2009, 6:e1000086. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000086, 2717209, 19668360.
11. Glasziou P, Meats E, Heneghan C, Shepperd S. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?. BMJ 2008, 336:1472-1474. 10.1136/bmj.39590.732037.47, 2440840, 18583680.
12. Schroter S, Glasziou P, Heneghan C. Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2012, 2:e001978. 3533061, 23180392.
13. Douet L, Milne R, Anstee S, Habens F, Young A, Wright D. The completeness of intervention descriptions in published National Institute of Health Research HTA-funded trials: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2014, 4:e003713. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003713, 3902303, 24384896.
14. Ovretveit JC, Shekelle PG, Dy SM, McDonald KM, Hempel S, Pronovost P, Rubenstein L, Taylor SL, Foy R, Wachter RM. How does context affect interventions to improve patient safety? An assessment of evidence from studies of five patient safety practices and proposals for research. BMJ Qual Saf 2011, 20(7):604-610. 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.047035, 21493589.
15. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000, 321:694. 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694, 1118564, 10987780.
16. Glasziou P, Chalmers I, Altman DG, Bastian H, Boutron I, Brice A, Jamtvedt G, Farmer A, Ghersi D, Groves T, Heneghan C, Hill S, Lewin S, Michie S, Perera R, Pomeroy V, Tilson J, Shepperd S, Williams JW. Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice. BMJ 2010, 341:c3852. 10.1136/bmj.c3852, 20709714.
17. Meijers JMM, Janssen MAP, Cummings GG, Wallin L, Estabrooks CA, Halfens YGR. Assessing the relationships between contextual factors and research utilization in nursing: systematic literature review. J Adv Nursing 2006, 55:622-635.
18. Estabrooks C, Squires J, Cummings G, Birdsell J, Norton P. Development and assessment of the Alberta Context Tool. BMC Health Serv Res 2009, 9:234. 10.1186/1472-6963-9-234, 2805628, 20003531.
19. The King's Fund Leadership and Engagement for Improvement in the NHS. Together We Can. [http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/field/field_publication_file/leadership-for-engagement-improvement-nhs-final-review2012.pdf], The King's Fund.
20. McCormack B, Kitson A, Harvey G, Rycroft-Malone J, Titchen A, Seers K. Getting evidence into practice: the meaning of 'context'. J Adv Nursing 2002, 38:94-104.
21. Mannion R, Konteh FH, Davies HTO. Assessing organisational culture for quality and safety improvement: a national survey of tools and tool use. Qual Saf Health Care 2009, 18:153-156. 10.1136/qshc.2007.024075, 19342532.