The Role of Religious Values in Decisions About Genetics and the Public's Health

Journal of Religion and Health

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 702-714

  Modell, Stephen M ^a   Citrin, Toby ^a   King, Susan B ^a   Kardia, Sharon L R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Biobanks; Breast cancer; Ecological models; Genetic screening; Genetics; Health; Morality; Newborn screening; Religious values

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899459967     PISSN: 00224197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10943-013-9814-y     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anderson, N. B. (1998). Levels of analysis in health science: A framework for integrating sociobehavioral and biomedical research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840(1), 563-576.
2. Anderson, N. B. (1999). Solving the puzzle of socioeconomic status and health: The need for integrated, multilevel, interdisciplinary research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 896(1), 302-312.
3. Barnes, P. M., Bloom, B., Nahin, R. L. (2008). Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. Hyattsville, MD: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.
4. Bonham, V. L., Citrin, T., Modell, S. M., Franklin, T. H., Bleicher, E. W. B., & Fleck, L. M. (2009). Community-based dialogue: Engaging communities of color in the United States' genetics policy conversation. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 34(3), 325-359.
5. Buchanan, D. R. (2000). An ethic for health promotion: Rethinking the sources of human well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Center for Public Health and Community Genomics (CPHCG), Genetic Alliance. (2011). Priorities for public health genomics 2012-2017. Stakeholder consultation, priorities conference report, September 2011. Ann Arbor, MI: CPHCG. http://genomicsforum. org/files/geno_report_WEB_w_RFI_1122rev. pdf. Accessed 4/1/13.
7. Center for the Advancement of Community Based Public Health (CACBPH). (1999). Excerpts from history of the Center for the Advancement of Community Based Public Health, 1997-1999. Durham, NC: CACBPH.
8. Chissell, J. T. (1996). Pyramids of power: An ancient African centered approach to optimal health. Baltimore, MD: Positive Perceptions Publications.
9. Chrysler, D., McGee, H., Bach, J., Goldman, E., & Jacobson, P. D. (2011). The Michigan BioTrust for Health: Using dried bloodspots for research to benefit the community while respecting the individual. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 39(Suppl S1), 98-101.
10. Douglas County v. Anaya, Supreme Court of Nebraska (2005). No. S-03-1446. Mar 25, 2005. http://caselaw. findlaw. com/ne-supreme-court/1369636. html. Accessed 6/25/12.
11. Dubos, R. (1959). Mirage of health: Utopias, progress, and biological change. New York: Harper and Row.
12. Duquette, D., Langbo, C., Bach, J., & Kleyn, M. (2012). Michigan BioTrust for Health: Public support for using residual dried blood spot samples for health research. Public Health Genomics, 15(3-4), 146-155.
13. Grazi, R. V., & Wolowelsky, J. B. (1992). Preimplantation sex selection and genetic screening in contemporary Jewish law and ethics. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 9(4), 318-322.
14. Haque, A. (2004). Psychology from the Islamic perspective: Contributions of early Muslim scholars and challenges to contemporary Muslim psychologists. Journal of Religion and Health, 43(4), 357-377.
15. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Assessing Interactions Among Social, Behavioral, and Genetic Factors in Health. (2006). Genes, behavior, and the social environment. Washington, D. C: The National Academies Press.
16. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Assuring the Health of the Public in the 21st century. (2002). The future of the public's health in the 21st century. Washington, D. C.: The National Academies Press.
17. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Educating Public Health Professionals for the 21st century. (2003). Who will keep the public healthy? Educating public health professionals in the 21st century. Washington, D. C.: The National Academies Press.
18. Karow, J. (2009). At least $145 M in FY'09 NIH stimulus funding goes to sequencing: Disease-focused studies dominate. http://recovery. nih. gov/Stories/ViewStory. aspx?id=107. Accessed 4/25/13.
19. Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Handbook of religion and health. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Krejci-Papa, M. (2005). Soulful reasoning. Science & Spirit. www. columbia. edu/cu/biology/faculty/pollack/publications/talks/Science&Spirit_11-05. pdf. Accessed 9/28/12.
21. Life Sciences & Society (LSS). (2006). How the life sciences may influence my behavior or the behavior of others. When faith meets science: An Evolving dialogue on new choices and new technologies discussion series. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
22. Modell, S. M. (2007). Genetic and reproductive technologies in the light of religious dialogue. Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 42(1), 163-182.
23. Modell, S. M. (2010). Aristotelian influence in the formation of medical theory. The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms, 15(4), 409-424.
24. Modell, S. M., Kardia, S. L. R., Citrin, T., & King, S. B. (2013). The ecological model in genetics and religion. In G. Simpson & S. Payne (Eds.), Religion and ethics (pp. 99-122). Happauge, New York: Nova Publishers.
25. Offit, K., & Thom, P. (2010). Ethicolegal aspects of cancer genetics. In B. Pasche (Ed.), Cancer genetics (pp. 1-14). New York: Springer Science.
26. Parker, E. A., Robins, T. G., Israel, B. A., Brakefield-Caldwell, W., Edgren, K. K., & Wilkins, D. J. (2005). Developing and implementing guidelines for dissemination: The experience of the community action against asthma project. In B. A. Israel, E. Eng, A. J. Schulz, & E. A. Parker (Eds.), Methods in community-based participatory research for health (pp. 285-306). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Payne, P. W., Jr, Royal, C., & Kardia, S. L. R. (2007). Genetic and social environment interactions and their impact on health policy. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery, 15(Suppl 1), S95-S98.
28. Robinson, F. P., Mathews, H. L., & Witek-Janusek, L. (2003). Psycho-endocrine-immune response to mindfulness-based stress reduction in individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: A quasiexperimental study. Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 9(5), 688-691.
29. Rodriguez, E. M. (2009). A qualitative exploration of the community partner experience in a faith-based breast cancer educational intervention. Health Education Research, 24(5), 760-771.
30. Rosner, F. (2002). The life of Moses Maimonides, a prominent Medieval physician. Einstein Quarterly Journal of Biology and Medicine, 19(3), 125-128.
31. Rothenberg, K. H., & Rutkin, A. B. (1998). Toward a framework of mutualism: The Jewish community in genetics research. Community Genetics, 1(3), 148-153.
32. Sarton, G. (1975). Introduction to the history of science (Vol. 1). New York: R. E. Krieger Publishing Co.
33. Schwartz, M. D., Hughes, C., Roth, J., Main, D., Peshkin, B. N., Isaacs, C., et al. (2000). Spiritual faith and genetic testing decisions among high-risk breast cancer probands. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 9, 381-385.
34. Seeskin, K. (2010). Maimonides. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA. http://plato. stanford. edu/entries/maimonides. Accessed 7/26/12.
35. Smith, A. D. (2012). The genetic complexity of cancer: Cancer centers take varying approaches to solving the puzzle. Targeted Therapy News, Sep, 1-8. www. targetedhc. com/publications/targeted-therapy-news/2012/September-2012. Accessed 4/25/13.
36. Warren, R. C., & Modell, S. M. (2006). Vital dimensions: An inquiry into the ultimate foundations of optimal health. Ultimate Reality and Meaning: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Philosophy of Understanding, 29(1-2), 78-96.
37. Wizemann, T., Berger, A. C., & Institute of Medicine roundtable on translating genomic-based research for health. (2010). The value of genetic and genomic technologies. Washington, D. C: The National Academies Press.