Device-driven metadata management solutions for scientific big data use cases

Proceedings - 2014 22nd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing, PDP 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 317-321

  Grunzke, Richard ^a   Hesser, Jürgen ^d   Starek, Jürgen ^b   Kepper, Nick ^d   Gesing, Sandra ^e   Hardt, Marcus ^c   Hartmann, Volker ^c   Kindermann, Stephan ^f   Potthoff, Jan ^c   Hausmann, Michael ^d   Muller Pfefferkorn, Ralph ^a   Jakel, Rene ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b DESY   (Germany)

^c KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^f Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum   (Germany)

Author keywords

Light Microscopy; Metadata Management; Photon Science; Scientific Big Data

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX NETWORKS; LIFE CYCLE; OPTICAL MICROSCOPY; PHOTONS;

ANALYSIS CAPABILITIES; BIG DATA APPLICATIONS; BIG DATUM; LARGE SCALE DATA SETS; METADATA MANAGEMENT; OPEN ARCHIVE INITIATIVES; PHOTON SCIENCE; PROTOCOL FOR METADATA HARVESTING;

METADATA;

EID: 84899411424     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/PDP.2014.119     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. B. Landesman. Seeing Standards: A Vi sualization of the Metadata Universe http://www.dlib.indiana.edu/enlrile/metadatamap. Technical Services Quarterly 28.4: 459-460, 2011.
2. P. Klosowski, M. Koenneckeb, J. Z. Tischlerc, R. Osbornc. NeXus: A common format for the exchange of neutron and synchroton data. Physica B: Condensed Matter 241: 151-153, 1997.
3. LSDMA: http://www.helmholtz-lsdma.de/
4. I. Goldberg, et al. The Open Microscopy Environment (OME) Data Model and XML file: open tools for informatics and quantitative analysis in biological imaging. Genome Biology, Vol. 6, Nr. 5, pp. R47, 2005.
5. D. Flannery, et al. ICAT: Integrating Data Infrastructure for Facilities Based Science, e-Science, 2009. e-Science '09. Fifth IEEE International Conference on, vol., no., pp.201, 207, doi: 10.1109/e-Science.2009.36, 2009.
6. C. Cremer, et al. (2011) Superresolution imaging of biological nanostructures by Spectral Precision Distance Microscopy (SPDM). Review. Biotech. J. 6: 1037-1051.
7. C. Allan, et al. OMERO: flexible, model-driven data management for experimental biology. Nature Methods 9, 245253. http://www.nature.com/nmeth/ journal/v9/n3/abs/nmeth.1896.html, 2012.
8. M. Linkert, et al. Metadata Matters: Access to Image Data in the Real World. The Journal of Cell Biology 189.5: 777-782, 2010.
9. M. Hausmann, P. Müller, R. Kaufmann, C. Cremer. Entering the nano-cosmos of the cell by means of spatial position determination microscopy (SPDM): Implications for medical diagnostics and radiation research. IFMBE Proc. 38: 93-95, 2013.
10. P. Mildenberger, M. Eichelberg, E. Martin. Introduction to the DICOM standard. European radiology, 12(4), 920-927, 2002.
11. M. Folk, A. Cheng, K. Yates. HDF5: A file format and I/O library for high performance computing applications. Proceed ings of Supercomputing. Vol. 99. 1999.
12. H. Van. de. Sompel, M. L. Nelson, C. Lagoze, S. Warner. Resource harvesting within the OAI-PMH framework. D-lib magazine, 10(12), 1082-9873, 2004.
13. Lucene and Solr: J. Rutherglen, J. Krupansky, R. Tabora, Lucene and Solr (Comprehensive) (Paperback), OReilly, 2013.