History, politics and judicial independence

Judicial Integrity

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 99-123

  Friedman, Barry ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899360007     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Mark Tushnet, "Returning with Interest: Observations on Some Putative Benefits of Studying Comparative Constitutional Law, " 1 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Review (1998) 325, 332
2. Marbury v. Madison, 5 US (1 Cranch) 137 (1803).
3. Barry Friedman, "The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part One: The Road to Judicial Supremacy, " 73 New York University Law Review (1998) 333, 394-395
4. Larry D. Kramer, "After the Founding: Political Parties and the Constitution, " 2 (unpublished manuscript, on file with author): "[D] espite the best efforts of the Framers and Founders, political parties emerged in a nascent form before George Washingtons administration was even three years old. "
5. William Nisbet Chambers, Political Parties in a New Nation: The American Experience 1776-1809, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1963) 158, 160, 166-168.
6. James M. O'Fallon, "Marbury, " 44 Stanford Law Review (1992) 219, 220
7. Richard E. Ellis, The Jeffersonian Crisis, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1971) 44-45
8. Charles Warren, The Supreme Court in United States History, Boston: Little, Brown & Co. (1926) 204-209.
9. Keith E. Whittington, "Reconstructing the Federal Judiciary: The Chase Impeachment and the Constitution, " 9 Studies on American Political Development (1995) 55, 63
10. Charles Warren, The Supreme Court in United States History, Boston: Little, Brown & Co. (1926), vol. 1., 273
11. Annals of Congress (1802) 91-92 (speech of Sen. Morris).
12. Charles F. Hobson et. al., 6 The Papers of John Marshall, Chapel Hill: University of North Caroline Press (1990) 347.
13. William W. Van Alstyne, "A Critical Guide to Marbury v Madison, " 18 Duke Law Journal (1969) 1, 30
14. Stuart v. Laird, 5 US (1 Cranch) 299 (1803).
15. Charles Warren, The Supreme Court in United States History, Boston: Little, Brown & Co. (1926) 204-209.
16. Charles Warren, The Supreme Court in United States History, Boston: Little, Brown & Co. (1926) 204-209., vol. 2., 773
17. Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US (19 How) 393 (1856).
18. Barry Friedman, "The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part One: The Road to Judicial Supremacy, " 73 New York University Law Review (1998), 427-428
19. Barry Friedman, "The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Three: The Lesson of Lochner, " 76 New York University Law Review, (2001) 1383
20. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Co, 157 US 429 (1895).
21. William G. Ross, A Muted Fury: Populists, Progressives, and Labor Unions Confront the Courts, 1890-1937, Princeton: Princeton University Press (1994) 169
22. Beulah Amidon Ratliff, "May Congress Limit the Supreme Court?" Nation (21 May 1924) 580
23. J.C. Rosenberger, "The Supreme Court of the United States as Expounder of the Constitution, " 30 American Law Review (1896) 55
24. Tom R. Tyler and Gregory Mitchell, "Legitimacy and the Empowerment of Discretionary Legal Authority: The United States Supreme Court and Abortion Rights, " 43 Duke Law Journal (1994) 703, 712
25. Eric Rasmusen, "Judicial Legitimacy as a Repeated Game, " 10 Journal of Law, Economics and Organization (1994) 63.
26. William M. Landes and Richard A. Posner, "The Independent Judiciary in an Interest-Group Perspective, " 18 Journal of Law and Economics (1975) 875.
27. Nicholas S. Zeppos, "Deference to Political Decisionmakers and the Preferred Scope of Judicial Review, " 88 New Law Review (1993) 296, 318-321
28. Mark A. Graber, "Naked Land Transfers and American Constitutional Development, " 53 Vanderbilt Law Review (2000) 73, 85-91
29. Ex Parte McCardle, 74 US (7 Wall) 506 (1868)
30. Warren, The Supreme Court in United States History, vol. 2., 474-482
31. Stanley I. Kutler, "Ex Parte McCardle: Judicial Impotency? The Supreme Court and Reconstruction Reconsidered, " 72 American History Review (1967) 835
32. William W. Van Alstyne, "A Critical Guide to Ex Parte McCardle, " 15 Arizona Law Review (1973) 229.
33. Barry Friedman, "The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Two: Reconstructions Political Court, " 20, 23
34. Stanley I. Kutier, Judicial Power and Reconstruction Politics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1968) 30
35. Ex Parte Yerger, 75 US (8 Wall) 85 (1868).
36. Friedman, "The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Two: Reconstructions Political Court, ", 52
37. Barry Friedman, "The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Four: Law's Politics, " 148 University of Pennsylvania Law Review (2000) 971.
38. McNollgast, "Politics and the Courts: A Positive Theory of Judicial Doctrine and the Rule of Law, " 68 Southern California Law Review (1995) 1631, 1662
39. John M. de Figueiredo, Gerald S. Gryski, Emerson H. Tiller, and Gary Zuk, "Congress and the Political Expansion of the United States District Courts 17' (26 April 2000)
40. "Senate Vote on Court Pay, " The New York Times (8 July 1964) 34
41. McNollgast, "Positive Canons: The Role of Legislative Bargains in Statutory Interpretation, " 80 Georgetown Law Journal (1992)705, 720-721.
42. Catherine Fisk and Erwin Chemerinsky, "The Filibuster, " 49 Stanford Law Review (1997) 181, 209-210
43. C. Herman Pritchett, Congress Versus the Supreme Court, 1957-1960, New York: Da Capo Press reprint (1973) 126-127
44. Stuart S. Nagel, "Court-Curbing Periods in American History, " 18 Vanderbilt Law Review (1965) 925
45. Gerald N. Rosenberg, "Judicial Independence and the Reality of Political Power, " 54 Review of Politics (1992) 369.
46. Thomas R. Marshall, Public Opinion and the Supreme Court, Boston: Unwin Hyman (1989) 78.
47. David G. Barnum, "The Supreme Court and Public Opinion: Judicial Decision Making in the Post-New Deal Period, " 47 Journal of Politics (1985) 652, 663
48. William Mishler and Reginald S. Sheehan, "The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions, " $7 American Political Science Review (1993) 87, 97
49. James A. Stimson, Michael B. Mackuen, and Robert S. Erikson, "Dynamic Representation, " 89 American Political Science Review (1995) 543, 556
50. Helmut Norpoth and Jeffrey A. Segal, "Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions-Comment, " 88 American Political Science Review (1994) 711, 716
51. Marshall, Public Opinion and the Supreme Court, 5, 78
52. Jonathan D. Casper, "The Supreme Court and National Policy Making, " 70 American Political Science Review (March 1976) 50, 54
53. Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954).
54. Richard Kluger, Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education on Black America's Struggle for Equality, New York: Vintage Books (1977)
55. Barry Friedman, "DialogueandJudicial Review, "91 Michigan Law Review (1993) 577, 590-592.
56. Robert A. Dahl, "Decision-Making in a Democracy:The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker, "Journal ojPublicLaw (1957) 279, 285
57. Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 US 702, 735 (1997)
58. Steven L. Winter, " Tennessee v. Garner and the Democratic Practice of Judicial Review, " 14 New York University Review of Law and Social Change (1986) 679
59. Lee Epstein and Jack Knight, The Choices Justices Make, Washington, DC: CQJPress (1998) 18, 87
60. Epstein and Knight, The Choices Justices Make, 87
61. Gregory A. Caldeira and John R. Wright, "Organized Interests and Agenda-Setting in the US Supreme Court, " 82 American Political Science Review (1988) 1109, 1121
62. Doris Marie Provine, Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court, Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1980) 82
63. Epstein and Knight The Choices Justices Make
64. William E. Leuchtenburg, The Supreme Court Reborn, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1995) 131
65. Friedman, "The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Four: Law's Politics, " 148 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1028-1031
66. Leuchtenburg, The Supreme Court Reborn, 135
67. Joseph Alsop and Turner Catledge, The 168 Days, Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Doran and Co (1938) 70-73
68. Barry Cushman, Rethinking the New Deal Court, Oxford: Oxford University Press (1998) 13
69. Friedman, "The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Four: Law's Politics, " 148 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1037-1046.
70. "Court Change Foes Hold Senate Lead, " The New York Times (11 Feb 1937) 15
71. Louis P. Goldberg and Eleanore Levenson, Lawless Judges, New York: Rand School Press (1935) 231
72. "Other Obsolete Traditions, " The New York Times (26 January 1936) 8
73. "Vehicle Carries Rights, " The New York Times (26 January 1936) 8
74. Bernard Schwartz, Super Chief, Earl Warren and His Supreme Court-A Judicial Biography, New York: New York University Press (1983).
75. Larry T. Aspin and William K. Hall, "Retention Elections and Judicial Behavior, " 77 Judicature (May-June 1994) 306
76. Kevin M. Esterling, "Judicial Accountability the Right Way, " 82 Judicature (March-April 1999) 206
77. Stephen B. Bright, "Political Attacks on the Judiciary, " 80 Judicature (Jan-Feb 1997) 165, 168-170