Ontology extraction using views for semantic web

Web Semantics and Ontology

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-40

  Wouters, Carlo ^a   Rajagopalapillai, Rajugan ^b   Dillon, Tharam S ^b   Rahayu, Wenny ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899309766     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-905-2.ch001     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Aberer, K., et al. (2004, June 17-19). Emergent semantics systems. First International IFIP Conference on Semantics of a Networked World (ICSNW 2004) - Revised Selected Papers, Paris.
2. Abiteboul, S. (1999). On views and XML. Proceedings of the 18th PODS'99.
3. Abiteboul, S., & Bonner, A. (1991). Objects and views. Proceedings of the International Conference on ACM SIGMOD.
4. Abiteboul, S., et al. (1997). Views for semistructured data. Workshop on Mgmt. of Semistructured Data.
5. Abiteboul, S., Quass, J., McHugh, J., Widom, J., & Wiener, J. (1997). The Lorel query language for semistructured data. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 1(1), 68-88.
6. Balsters, H. (2003, September). Modelling database views with derived classes in the UML/OCL-framework. The Unified Modeling Language: Modeling Languages and Applications (UML'03).
7. Berners-Lee, T. (1998). Semantic Web road map. Retrieved from http://www.w3c.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html
8. Bertino, E. (1992). A view mechanism for object-oriented databases. The 3rd International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT '92), Vienna, Austria.
9. Bhatt, M., et al.(2004, March 29-31). A distributed approach to sub-ontology extraction. The 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA'04), Volume 1, Fukuoka, Japan.
10. Cattell, R. G. G., et al.(Eds.). (2000). The object data standard: ODMG 3.0. Morgan Kaufmann.
11. Chan, S., Dillon, T. S., & Siu, A. (2002). Applying a mediator architecture employing XML to retailing inventory control. The Journal of Systems and Software, 60, 239-248.
12. Chang, E. J. (1996). Object oriented user interface design and usability evaluation. Published Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
13. Chen, Y. B., Ling, T. W., & Lee, M. L. (2002). Designing valid XML views. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER'02), Tampere, Finland.
14. Cluet, S., Veltri, P., & Vodislav, D. (2001). Views in a large scale XML repository. Proceedings of the 27th VLDB Conference (VLDB'01), Roma, Italy.
15. Cruz, I., Decker, S., Euzenat, J., & McGuinness, D. (Eds.). (2002). The emerging Semantic Web: Selected papers from the first Semantic Web Working Symposium. Tokyo: IOS Press.
16. Date, C. J. (2003). An introduction to database systems (8th ed.). New York: Pearson/Addison Wesley.
17. Dillon, T. S., & Tan, P. L. (1993). Object-oriented conceptual modeling. Australia: Prentice Hall.
18. Do, H. H., & Rahm, E. (2004). Flexible integration of molecular-biological annotation data: The genmapper approach. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT'04), Greece.
19. Elmasri, R., & Navathe, S. (2004). Fundamentals of database systems (4th ed.). New York: Pearson/Addison Wesley.
20. Feng, L., Chang, E., & Dillon, T. S. (2002). A semantic network-based design methodology for XML documents. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 20(4), 390-421.
21. Feng, L., Chang, E., & Dillon, T. S. (2003). Schemata transformation of objectoriented conceptual models to XML. International Journal of Computer Systems Science & Engineering, 18(1), 45-60.
22. Feng, L., et al. (2003, September 1-5). An XML-enabled association rule framework. The 14th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA'03), Prague, Czech Republic.
23. Gaševic, D., et al. (2004a). Approaching OWL and MDA through technological spaces. The 3rd Workshop in Software Model Engineering (WiSME 2004), Lisbon, Portugal.
24. Gaševic, D., et al. (2004b). Converting UML to OWL ontologies. Proceedings of the 13th International WWW Conference, New York.
25. Golfarelli, M., Maio, D., & Rizzi, S. (1998). The dimensional fact model: A conceptual model for data warehouses. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 7(2-3), 215-247.
26. Graham, I., et al. (2001). Object-oriented methods: Principles & practice (3rd ed.). Harlow: Addison-Wesley.
27. HyOntUse. (2003). User oriented hybrid ontology development environments. Retrieved from http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/mig/projects/current/hyontuse/
28. KAON. (2004). KAON project. Retrieved from http://kaon.semanticweb.org/Members/rvo/Folder.2002-08-22.1409/Module.2002-08-22.1426/view
29. Kim, W., & Kelly, W. (1995). On view support in object-oriented database systems. In Modern database systems (pp. 108-129). Addison-Wesley.
30. Liefke, H., & Davidson, S. (2000, September 4-6). View maintenance for hierarchical semistructured. Proceedings of the Second International Conference DaWak '00, London.
31. Lucie-Xyleme. (2001, July 16-18). Xyleme: A dynamic warehouse for XML data of the Web. International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium (IDEAS'01), Grenoble, France.
32. Ludaescher, B., Papakonstantinou, Y., Velikhov, P., & Vianu, V. (1999). View definition and DTD inference for XML. Post-ICDT Workshop on Query Processing for Semistructured Data and Non-Standard Data Formats.
33. Mohania, M. K., Karlapalem, K., & Kambayashi, Y. (1999). Data warehouse design and maintenance through view normalization. The 10th International Conference on DEXA '99, Florence, Italy.
34. Nassis, V., Rajugan, R., Dillon, T. S., & Rahayu, W. (2005). Conceptual and systematic design approach for XML document warehouses. International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining, 1(3).
35. Noy, N., & Musen, M. (2002). Promptdiff: A fixed-point algorithm for comparing ontology versions. Proceedings of the 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
36. OMG-OCL. (2003). UML 2.0 OCL. Retrieved from http://www.omg.org/cgibin/doc?ptc/2003
37. OMG-UML™. (2003a). UML 2.0 final adopted specification. Retrieved from http://www.uml.org/#UML2.0
38. OMG-UML™. (2003b). Unified Modeling Language™ (UML) Version 1.5 Specification. OMG.
39. Rajugan, R., Chang, E., Dillon, T. S., & Ling, F. (2003). XML Views: Part 1. The 14th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA'03), Prague, Czech Republic.
40. Rajugan, R., et al.(2005). XML views, Part III: Modeling XML conceptual views using UML. The 7th Int. Conf. on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS'05), Miami, FL.
41. Rajugan, R., Chang, E., Dillon, T. S., & Ling, F. (2005a, September 21-23). Engineering XML solutions using views. The 5th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT'05), Shanghai, China.
42. Rajugan, R., et al.(2005b, September 21-23). A layered view model for XML repositories & XML data warehouses. The 5th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT '05), Shanghai, China.
43. Rajugan, R., Chang, E., Dillon, T. S., & Ling, F. (2005c, October 24-28). A three-layered XML view model: A practical approach. The 24th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER'05), Klagenfurt, Austria.
44. Roussopoulos, et al. (2001). The opsis project: Materialized views for data warehouses and the Web. Advances in Informatics (Revised selected papers) 8th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics (PCI '01).
45. Spyns, P., Meersman, R., & Mustafa, J. (2002). Data modeling versus ontology engineering. SIGMOD.
46. Trujillo, J., et al. (2001, December). Designing data warehouses with OO conceptual models. IEEE Computer Society, "Computer", 66-75.
47. Volz, R., Oberle, D., & Studer, R. (2003a, July 16-18). Implementing views for light-weight Web ontologies. Seventh International Conference on IDEAS'03, Hong Kong, SAR.
48. Volz, R., Oberle, D., & Studer, R. (2003b). Views for light-weight Web ontologies. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC'03).
49. W3C-OWL. (2002). OWL Web Ontology Language 1.0 reference.
50. W3C-RDF. (2004, February 4). Resource Description Framework (RDF). Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/RDF/
51. W3C-SW. (2005a). Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/
52. W3C-SW. (2005b). Semantic Web. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/2001/sw
53. W3C-XML. (2004, February 4). Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/XML
54. W3C-XPath. (1999, November). XML Path Language (XPath) Version 1.0.
55. Warmer, J. B., & Kleppe, A. G. (2003). The object constraint language: Getting your models ready for MDA (2nd ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley.
56. Wongthamtham, P., et al.(2003, December 2-5). Ontology based solution for software development. International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications (ICSSEA '03), Paris.
57. Wouters, C., et al. (2002, September 2-6). A practical walkthrough of the ontology derivation rules. The 13th International Conference on DEXA'02, Aix-en-Provence, France.
58. Wouters, C., et al. (2004a, March 17-19). Ontologies on the MOVE. The 9th International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA '04), Jeju Island, Korea.
59. Wouters, C., Dillon, T. S., Rahayu, J. W., Chang, E., & Meersman, R. (2004b). A practical approach to the derivation of a materialized ontology view. In D. Taniar, & W. Rahayu (Eds.), Web information systems. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
60. Zhuge, Y., & Garcia-Molina, H. (1998). Graph structured views and incremental maintenance. Proceeding of the 14th IEEE Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE '98).