Representations of tribal boundaries of Australian indigenous peoples and the implications for geographic information systems

Information Technology and Indigenous People

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 232-244

  Turk, Andrew ^a  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899289169     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-298-5.ch031     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. AUSLIG, (2003). Feature codes used by the Gazetteer of Australia. Retrieved June 23, 2004, from http://www.ga.gov.au/map/names/featurecodes.jsp
2. Benko, G., & Strohmayer, U. (Eds.). (1997). Space and social theory: Interpreting modernity and postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Davis, S., & Prescott, J. R. V. (1992). Aboriginal frontiers and boundaries in Australia. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.
4. Jones, C. (2002). Aboriginal boundaries: The mediation and settlement of aboriginal boundary disputes in a native title context (National Native Title Tribunal Occasional Paper Series No. 2/2002). Perth, Australia: National Native Title Tribunal, Commonwealth of Australia.
5. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Mabo. (1992). Australian High Court decision in "Mabo v Queensland" (No. 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1 [which led to the passing of the "Native Title Act" 1993 (Cth)].
7. Mark, D. M., Egenhofer, M. J., & Hornsby, K. (1997). Formal models of commonsense geographic worlds (NCGIA Technical Report No. 97-2). Buffalo: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, State University of New York, Buffalo.
8. Mark, D. M., & Turk A. G. (2003). Landscape categories in Yindjibarndi: Ontology, environment, and language. In W. Kuhn, M. F. Worboys & S. Timpf (Eds.), Spatial information theory: Foundations of geographic information science (LNCS 2825, pp. 31-49). Berlin: Springer.
9. Mark, D. M., & Turk, A. G. (2004, October). Ethnophysiography and the ontology of the landscape. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Geographic Information Science, GIScience 2004, MD (pp. 152-155).
10. Miller, R. P. (1995). Beyond method, beyond ethics: Integrating social theory into GIS and GIS into social theory. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22(1), 98-103.
11. Muecke, S., Benterrak, K., & Roe, P. (1984). Reading the country: An introduction to nomadology. Fremantle, WA: Fremantle Arts Centre Press.
12. NNTT. (2003). Australian National Native Title Tribunal - Report on recent decisions. Retrieved June 23, 2004, from http://www.nntt.gov.au/media/1057275393_2456.html
13. Prickles, J. (Ed.). (1995). Ground truth. New York: Guilford Press.
14. Reynolds, H. (1992). The law of the land. Ringwood, Vic: Penguin.
15. Rundstrom, R. A. (1995). GIS, indigenous peoples, and epistemological diversity. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22(1), 45-57.
16. Sutton, P. (1995). Country: Aboriginal boundaries and land ownership in Australia (Aboriginal History Monograph 3). Canberra: Department of History, Australian National University.
17. Trees, K. A., & Turk, A. G. (1998). Culture, collaboration and communication: Participative development of the Ieramugadu Cultural Heritage Information System (ICIS). Critical Arts, 12(1-2), 78-91.
18. Turk, A. G. (1996). Presenting aboriginal knowledge: Using technology to progress native title claims. Alternative Law Journal, 21(1), 6-9.
19. Turk, A.G. (2003). Digital divide remediation: An Australian indigenous community case study. Southern Review, 36(1) (Special Issue re Wired Communities and Information Poverty), 48-63.
20. Turk, A.G., & Mackaness, W.A. (1995). Design considerations for spatial information systems and maps to support native title negotiation and arbitration. Cartography, 24(2), 17-28.
21. th International Cartographic Conference, ICC'95, Barcelona (Vol. 1, pp. 1109-1115).
22. Turk, A. G., & Trees, K. A. (1998a). Ethical issues concerning the development of an indigenous cultural heritage information system. Systemist 20 (Special Issue), 229-242.
23. nd Annual Conference of the International Society for System Sciences [CD-Rom], Atlanta, GA.
24. Turk, A.G., & Trees, K. A. (1998c). Culture and participation in development of CMC: Indigenous cultural information system case study. In C. Ess, & F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Proceedings of the international cultural attitudes towards technology and communication - CATaC'98, Science Museum, London (pp. 219-223). Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney.
25. Turk, A. G., & Trees, K. A. (1999a). Culturally appropriate computer mediated communication: An Australian indigenous information system case study. AI and Society, 13, 377-388.
26. Turk, A. G., & Trees, K. A. (1999b). Ethical issues concerning the use of geographic information systems technology with indigenous communities. Proceedings of the Australian Institute of Computer Ethics Conference, AICEC99, Melbourne, Australia (pp. 385-398).
27. Turk, A. G., & Trees, K. A. (2000). Facilitating community processes through culturally appropriate informatics: An Australian indigenous community information system case study. In M. Gurstein (Ed.), Community informatics: Enabling communities with information and communication technologies (pp. 339-358). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
28. Turnbull, D. (1989). Maps are territories: Science is an atlas. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
29. Warren, A. (2004, November). Becoming our own cartographic masters. Keynote presentation to the AIATSIS Conference: Indigenous studies - Sharing the cultural and theoretical space, Canberra.
30. Watson-Verran, H., & Turnbull, D. (1995). Science and other indigenous knowledge systems. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 115-139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.