Reconsidering higher education and the public good: the role of public spheres

Governance and the Public Good

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 11-27

  Pusser, Brian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899262223     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Ambrozas, D. 1998. The university as a public sphere. Canadian Journal of Communication, 23(1). http://www.cjc-online.ca/viewarticle.php?id=447.
2. Aronowitz, S. 2000. The knowledge factory. Boston: Beacon Press.
3. Baldridge, J. V. 1971. Power and conflict in the university: Research in the sociology of complex organizations. New York: J.Wiley.
4. Becker, G. 1964. Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. New York: Columbia University Press.
5. Benhabib, S. 1992. Models of public space: Hannah Arendt, the liberal tradition, and Jurgen Habermas. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. C. Calhoun, 73-98. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6. Berdahl, R. 1971. Statewide coordination of higher education.Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
7. Bok,D. 2003. Universities in the marketplace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Breneman, D.W. 1991. Guaranteed student loans: Great success or dismal failure? Indianapolis, IN: United Student Aid Fund.
9. -. 2003. Declining access: A potential-if slow-moving-train wreck. National CROSSTALK 11(2) (Spring
10. Burd, S. 2003. High stakes on tuition. Chronicle of Higher Education (May 2): 34-35.
11. Calhoun, C. 1992. Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. C. Calhoun, 1-47. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Chavez, L. 1998. The color bind. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13. Cook, C. E. 1998. Lobbying for higher education: How colleges and universities influence federal policy. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
14. Cuban, L., and Shipps, D. 2000. Reconstructing the connom good in education: Coping with intractable American Dilemmas. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15. Douglass, J. A. 2000. The California idea and American higher education: 1850 to the 1960 master plan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Ehrenberg, R. G. 2000. Tuition rising:Why colleges cost so much. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Feller, I. 2000. Social contracts and the impact of matching fund requirements on American research universities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 22(1): 91-98.
18. Fraser, N. 1992. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed., C. Calhoun , 109-42. Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. Freire, P. 1970. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum Press.
20. Geiger, R. L. 2004. Knowledge and money. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21. Giroux, H. A. 2002. Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review 72(4): 425-63.
22. -. 2003. Selling out higher education. Policy Futures in Education 1(1): 179-200.
23. Giroux, H. A., and S. S. Giroux. 2004. Take back higher education: Race, youth, and the crisis of democracy in the post-civil rights era. New York: Palgrave.
24. Gitlin, T. 1987. The sixties: Years of hope, days of rage. New York: Bantam.
25. Goldin, C., and L. Katz. 1998. The shaping of higher education: The formative years in the United States, 1890-1940. Working Paper 6537. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
26. Gumport, P. J. 2002. Universities and knowledge: Restructuring the city of intellect. In The future of the city of intellect, ed. S. Brint, 47-81. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27. Habermas, J. 1962. The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.
28. -. 1991. The public sphere. In Rethinking popular culture, ed. C. Mukerji and M. Schudson, 398-406. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29. -. 1996. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Institute for Higher Education Policy (IHEP). 1998. Reaping the benefits: Defining the public and private value of going to college.Washington, DC: Author.
31. Ingram, R. 1994. Effective Trusteeship: A guide for board members of independent colleges and universities. Washington, DC: Association of Governing Boards.
32. Jefferson, T. 1812. Letter to William Duane. ME 13: 186, Library of Congress.
33. Kerr, C., and M. Gade. 1989. The guardians: Boards of trustees of American colleges and universities. Washington, DC: Association of Governing Boards.
34. Kirp, D. L. 2004. Shakespeare, Einstein, and the bottom line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Kurlansky,M. 2004. 1968: The year that rocked the world. New York: Ballantine Books.
36. Levin, J. 2001. Globalizing the community college: Strategies for change in the twenty-first century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
37. Levine, L. 1996. The opening of the American mind: Canons, culture, and history. Boston: Beacon Press.
38. Maldonado, A. 2002. The National Autonomous University of Mexico: A continuing struggle. International Higher Education 28: 23-25.
39. Mansbridge, J. 1998. On the contested nature of the public good. In Private action and the public good, ed. W. W. Powell and E. S. Clemens, 3-19. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40. Marginson, S. 1997. Markets in education. Melbourne: Allen and Unwin.
41. -. 2004. Competition and markets in higher education: A "glonacal" analysis. Policy Futures in Education 2(2): 175-244.
42. Marginson, S., and M. Considine. 2000. The enterprise university. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Newman, F., and L. K. Couturier. 2001. The new competitive arena: Market forces invade the academy. Change, Sept./Oct., 10-17.
44. Olivas, M. A. 2004. The rise of nonlegal legal influences on higher education. In Governing academia, ed. R.G. Ehrenberg, 258-75. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
45. Ordorika, I. 2003. Power and politics in university governance: Organization and change at the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. New York: Routledge Falmer.
46. Orr, M. 2004. Political science and educational research: An exploratory look at two political science journals. Educational Researcher 33(5): 1-6.
47. Powell, W. W., and E. S. Clemens, eds. 1998. Private action and the public good. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
48. Pusser, B. 2002. Higher education, the emerging market, and the public good. In The knowledge economy and postsecondary education, ed. P. Graham and N. Stacey, 105-26. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
49. -. 2003. Beyond Baldridge: Extending the political model of higher education governance. Educational Policy 17(1): 121-40.
50. -. 2004. Burning down the house: Politics, governance, and affirmative action at the University of California. Albany: State University of New York Press.
51. Pusser, B., and D. Doane. 2001. Public purpose and private enterprise: The contemporary organization of secondary education. Change, 33, 18-22.
52. Rensburg, I. L. 1996. Collective identity and public policy: From resistance to reconstruction in South Africa, 1986-1995. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
53. Rhoades, G. 1992. Beyond "the state": Interorganizational relations and state apparatus in postsecondary education. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, ed. J. C. Smart, 84-142). New York: Agathon.
54. -. 1998. Managed professionals: Unionized faculty and restructuring academic labor. Albany: State University of New York Press.
55. Rhoades, G., and R. A. Rhoads. 2002. The public discourse of U.S. graduate employee unions: Social movement identities, ideologies, and strategies. Review of Higher Education 26(2): 163-86.
56. Rich, A. 1979. On lies, secrets, and silences, selected prose: 1966-1978. New York: Norton.
57. Rudolph, F. 1965. The American college and university. New York: Vintage Books.
58. Savage, J.D. 1999. Funding science in America: Congress, universities, and the politics of the academic pork barrel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Slaughter, S. 1990. The higher learning and high technology: Dynamics of higher education policy formation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
60. Slaughter, S., and L. L. Leslie. 1997. Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
61. Slaughter, S., and G. Rhoades. 2004. Academic capitalism and the new economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
62. Stepp, L. S. 2003. Pill ban gives birth to protest. Washington Post, April 24, p. C01.
63. Sunstein, C. R. 2004. The second bill of rights. New York: Basic Books.
64. Tierney, W. G. 2004. A perfect storm: Turbulence in higher education. In Competing conceptions of academic governance, ed.,W. G.Tierney, xv-xxxi. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
65. Turner, S., and B. Pusser. 2004. Nonprofit and for-profit governance in higher education. In Governing academia, ed. R. G. Ehrenberg, 235-57. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
66. Winston, G. 1997.Why can't a college be more like a firm? Change, Sept./Oct. 33-38.
67. -. 1999. Subsidies, hierarchy, and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives 13(1): 13-36.
68. Winston, G., J. C. Carbone, and E. G. Lewis. 1998.What's been happening to higher education: A reference manual, 1986-87 to 1994-95. Working Paper No. 47. Williamstown, MA: The Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education.