Personal social services

Social Policy Review 17: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 85-104

  Netten, Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899173061     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Atkinson, T. (2004) Atkinson review: Interim report. Measurement of government output and productivity for the National Accounts, London: The Stationery Office.
2. Becker, G. (1965) ‘A theory of the allocation of time’, The Economic Journal, September, vol 75, no 299, pp 493-517.
3. CSCI (Commission for Social Care Inspection) (2004a) Social services performance assessment framework indicators, London: CSCI.
4. CSCI (2004b) Inspecting for better lives (modernising the regulation of social care), London: CSCI.
5. Clark, H., Dyer, S. and Horwood, L. (1998) ‘That bit of help’: The high value of low level preventative services for older people, Bristol: The Policy Press.
6. Dasgupta, P (1986) ‘Positive freedom, markets and the welfare state’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol 2, no 2, pp 25-36.
7. DH (Department of Health) (1999) A new approach to social services, Consultation document, London: DH.
8. DH (2000) Community Care (Direct Payments) Act 1996: Policy and practice guidance (2nd edn), London: DH.
9. DH (2001a) Valuing people: A new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century, London: DH.
10. DH (2001b) £300m ‘cashforchange’ initiative to tackle ‘bedblocking’:Agreement with private and voluntary sectors provides foundationfor radical reform programme, Press release 2001/0464, London: DH.
11. DH (2002a) ‘Expanded services and increased choices for older people: investment and reform for older people’s social services’, Press release 2002/0324, London: DH.
12. DH (2002b) ‘£200m allocated to councils to further reduce ‘bedblocking’: delayed discharges reduced by ten per cent since September’, Press release 2002/0007, London: DH.
13. DH (2003) Personal social services survey of home care users in England aged 65 or over: 2002-03, Statistical bulletin 2003/26, London: DH.
14. DH (2004a) ‘An extra £100 million for social services to tackle delayed discharge’, Press release 2004/0502, 28 November, London: DH.
15. DH (2004b) ‘“Independence not dependence”: New Extra Care Housing places for older people announced’, Press release 2004/0070, London: DH.
16. DH (2004c) ‘Successful bids to the second round’, Press release 2004/0223, 14 June, London: DH.
17. DH (2004d) Personal social services survey of physically disabled and sensory impaired users in England aged 18-64: 2003-04, Statistical bulletin 2004/03, London: DH.
18. Drummond, M.F., O’Brien, B., Stoddart, G.L. and Torrance, G.W (1997) Methods for the economic evaluation of healthcare programmes (2nd edn), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Francis, J. and Netten, A. (2003) Home care workers: Careers, commitments and motivations, PSSRU discussion paper no 2053, Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent.
20. Henwood, M. (2001) Future imperfect?, Report of the King’s Fund Care and Support Inquiry, London: King’s Fund.
21. Laing & Buisson (2004) Care of elderly people: Market Survey 2004, 17th edn, London: Laing &Buisson.
22. Lancaster, K. (1966) A new approach to consumer theory, Journal of Political Economy, vol 74, issue 2, pp 132-57.
23. Litwak, E. (1985) Helping the elderly: The complementary roles of informal networks and formal systems, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24. Netten, A. and Davies, B. (1990) ‘The social production of welfare and consumption of social services’, Journal of Public Policy, vol 10, no 3, pp 331-47.
25. Netten, A., Darton, R. and Williams, J. (2003) ‘Nursing home closures: effects on capacity and reasons for closure’, Age and Ageing, vol 32, no 3, pp 332-7.
26. Netten, A., McDaid, D., Fernandez, J.-L., Forder, J., Knapp, M., Matosevic, T. and Shapiro, J. (2005) Measuring and understanding social services outputs, Discussion paper no 2132/2, Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent.
27. Netten, A., Ryan, M., Smith, P, Skatun, D., Healey, A., Knapp, A. and Wykes, T. (2002) The development of a measure of social care outcome for older people, Discussion paper no 1690/2, Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent (www.ukc.ac.uk/PSSRU/).
28. Pickard, L., Wittenberg, R., Comas-Herrera, A., Davies, B. and Darton, R. (2001) Community care for frail older people: Analysis using the 1998/99 General Household Survey. Quality in later life: Rights, rhetoric and reality, Proceedings of the British Society of Gerontology 30th Annual Conference, 31 August-2 September, Stirling: University of Stirling, Scotland.
29. Pollak, R.A. (1985) ‘A transaction cost approach to families and households’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol 23, issue 2, pp 581-608.
30. Qureshi, H., Patmore, C., Nicholas, E. and Bamford, C. (1998) Outcomes in community care practice. Overview: Outcomes of social care for older people and carers, York: Social Policy Research Unit, University ofYork.
31. Simone, B. (2004) ‘Personal care services in New York’, Paper given at the Gerontological Society of America 57 th Annual Scientific Meeting, 19-23 November, Washington DC.
32. Wolfsenberger, W (1972) The principle of normalisation in human services, Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.