Changing paradigms: A sketch for sustainable wellbeing and ecosocial policy

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 2160-2175

  Hirvilammi, Tuuli ^a   Helne, Tuula ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b SOCIAL INSURANCE INSTITUTION   (Finland)

Author keywords

Environment; Relationality; Social policy; Sustainability; Wellbeing

Indexed keywords

GEOLOGICAL RECORD; GLOBAL CHANGE; HUMAN ACTIVITY; SOCIAL POLICY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84899154292     PISSN: 20711050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su6042160     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Meadows, D. Envisioning a Sustainable World. Donella Meadows Institute. Available online: http://www.donellameadows.org/archives/envisioning-a-sustainable-world/ (accessed on 3 May 2013)
2. Catton, W. Understanding Humanity's Damaged Future. Sociol. Inq. 2009, 79, 509-522.
3. Barnosky, A.D.; Hadly, E.A.; Bascompte, J.; Berlow, E.L.; Brown, J.H.; Fortelius, M.; Getz, W.M.; Harte, J.; Hastings, A.; Marquet, P.A; et al. Approaching a state shift in Earth's biosphere. Nature 2012, 486, 52-58.
4. Living Planet Report 2012. Biodiversity, biocapacity and better choices. Available online: http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/1_lpr_2012_online_full_size_single_pages_final_120516.pdf (accessed on 29 May 2013)
5. Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ed.; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1970; p. 210.
6. Meadows, D. Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. Donella Meadows Institute. Available online: http://www.donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/ (accessed on 2 May 2013).
7. Milbrath, L.W. Envisioning a Sustainable Society. Learning Our Way Out; State University of New York Press: Albany, NY, USA, 1989.
8. Catton, W.; Dunlap, R. A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-Exuberant Sociology. Am. Behav. Sci. 1980, 24, 15-47.
9. Bateson, G. Steps to an Ecology of Mind; Ballantine Books: New York, NY, USA, 1985.
10. Bandarage, A. Sustainability and Well-Being. The Middle Path to Environment, Society, and the Economy; Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 2013.
11. Barkin, D.; Lemus, B. Understanding Progress: A Heterodox Approach. Sustainability 2013, 5, 417-431.
12. Assadourian, E. The Rise and Fall of Consumer Cultures. In State of the World 2010. Transforming Cultures; Starke, L., Mastly, L., Eds.; Worldwatch Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2010; pp. 3-20.
13. Hall, P. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state. The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comp. Polit. 1993, 25, 275-296.
14. Campbell, J.L. Ideas, Politics, and Public Policy. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2002, 28, 21-38.
15. Pattberg, P. Conquest, Domination and Control: Europe's Mastery of Nature in Historic Perspective. J. Polit. Ecol. 2007, 14, 1-9. See: [59].
16. Catton, W.; Dunlap, R. Environmental Sociology: A New Paradigm. Am. Sociol. 1978, 13, 41-49.
17. Meadows, D. System Dynamics Meets the Press. In The Global Citizen; Island Press: Washington, WA, USA, 1991; pp. 1-12. Available online: http://clexchange.org/ftp/documents/ Roadmaps/RM1/D-4143-1.pdf (accessed on 3 May 2013).
18. Fitzpatrick, T. Challenges for social policy. In Understanding the Environment and Social Policy; Fitzpatrick, T., Ed.; Policy Press and Social Policy Association: Bristol, UK, 2011; pp. 61-90.
19. Besthorn, F. Deep Ecology's contributions to social work: A ten-year retrospective. Int. J. Soc. Welf. 2012, 21, 248-259.
20. Naess, A. Self-Realization. An ecological approach to being in the world. In Deep Ecology for the Twenty-First Century; Sessions, G., Ed.; Shambhala: Boston/London, USA/UK, 1995; pp. 225-245.
21. Serres, M. Le Contrat Naturel; Francois Bourin: Paris, France, 1990; p. 191. (In French)
22. Gergen, K. Relational Being. Beyond Self and Community; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009; p. 418.
23. Hämäläinen, T. Towards a Sustainable Well-Being Society. Building Blocks for a New Socioeconomic Model; SITRA: Helsinki, Finland, 2013. Available online: http://www.sitra.fi/ julkaisut/muut/Towards_a_Sustainable_Wellbeing_Society.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2013).
24. Gough, I.; McGregor, J.A.; Camfield, L. Theorising wellbeing in international development. In Wellbeing in Developing Countries. From Theory to Research; Gough, I., McGregor, J.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 1-43.
25. This deep intuition can be detected in the responses of the inhabitants of various U.S. communities when they were asked to define indicators of their long-term welfare. They referenced such things as whether wild salmon still run in the rivers, and whether, when opening the window, one can smell the sage. See: [60].
26. Maslow, A. Toward a Psychology of Being, 1st ed.; Wilder Publications: Blacksburg, VA, USA, 2011; p. 179.
27. Fromm, E. Zen Buddhism and Psychoanalysis, 1st ed.; George Allen & Unwin: London, UK, 1960; p. 180.
28. This resembles the ideas of capability approach where the aim of human development is an ultimate freedom to exercise human agency and where wellbeing is evaluated in terms of potential freedoms, i.e., capabilities. See: [61].
29. Jackson, T. Prosperity without Growth. Economics for a Finite Planet; Earthscan: London, UK, 2009; p. 264.
30. Max-Neef, M.; Elizalde, A.; Hopenhayn, M. Development and Human Needs. In Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections; Max-Neef, M., Elizalde, A., Hopenhayn, M., Eds.; The Apex Press: New York/London, USA/UK, 1991; p. 114.
31. In the last resort the word "satisfier" is not really compatible with growth needs. When it comes down to deficit needs, the world is organized into gratifiers and frustrators of our needs. As far as the needs of growing are concerned, we see objects in their own right and in their own Being, without reference to their need-gratifying qualities. See: [26] (p. 151).
32. Doyal, L.; Gough, I. A Theory of Human Need; Macmillan: Basingstoke, Hampshire and London, UK, 1991; p. 365.
33. Allardt developed this conceptualization when conducting the Comparative Scandinavian Welfare Study during the first half of the 1970's. See: [62].
34. Allardt, E.; Uusitalo, H. Dimensions of Welfare in a Comparative Study with the Scandinavian Societies. Scand. Polit. Stud. 1972, 7, 9-26. See: [63].
35. Allardt, E. Human welfare and non-waste technology. In Technology and Environment. Facing the Future; Johansson, A., Ed.; Finnish Academies of Technology: Helsinki, Finland, 1990; pp. 9-22.
36. Allardt, E. Having, Loving, Being: An Alternative to the Swedish Model of Welfare Research. In The Quality of Life; Nussbaum, M., Sen, A., Eds.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1993; pp. 88-94.
37. Originally Allardt did not consider environmental factors here. However, when operationalizing the dimension further he emphasized that to describe the level of human welfare, cumulative environmental problems necessitate measures of the biological and physical environment, such as soil, lake or groundwater acidification. See: [35, 36].
38. Lyubomirsky, S.; Sheldon, K.M.; Schkade, D. Pursuing happiness. The architecture of sustainable change. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2005, 9, 111-131.
39. Hirvilammi, T.; Lettenmeir, M.; Laakso, S.; Lähteenoja, S. Studying well-being and its environmental impacts: A case study of minimum income receivers in Finland. J. Hum. Dev. Capabil. 2012, 14, 134-154.
40. De Vries, S.; Verheij, R.; Groenewegen, P.; Spreeuwenberg, P. Natural environments-Healthy environments? An explaratory analysis between greenspace and health. Environ. Plann. 2003, 35, 1717-1731.
41. Allardt, E. An Updated Indicator System: Having, Loving, Being; Working Papers 48; Department of Sociology, University of Helsinki: Helsinki, Finland, 1989.
42. Koch, M. Welfare after Growth. Theoretical Discussion and Policy Implications. Int. J. Soc. Qual. 2013, 3, 4-20.
43. Schneider, F.; Kallis, G.; Martinéz-Alier, J. Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 511-518.
44. Andersson, J.O. Degrowth with basic income-The radical combination. Documentation of the 14th BIEN Congress, Munich, Germany, 15 September 2012. Available online: http://www.bien2012.de/sites/default/files/paper_237_en.pdf (accessed on 28 January 2014)
45. Fitzpatrick, T. With No Strings Attached? Basic Income and the Greening of Security. In Environment and Welfare. Towards a Green Social Policy; Fitzpatrick, T., Cahill, M., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan: Hampshire, UK, 2002; pp. 138-154.
46. Gough, I.; Meadowcroft, J. Decarbonizing the welfare state. In Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society; Dryzek, J.S., Norgaard, R.B., Shlossberg, D., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2011; pp. 490-503.
47. Ulvila, M.; Pasanen, J. Transformation scenarios to sustainable economy and equality. In Sustainable Futures. Replacing Growth Imperative and Hierarchies with Sustainable Ways; Ulvila, M., Pasanen, J., Eds.; Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland: Helsinki, Finland, 2009; pp. 14-85.
48. Daly, H.E. Beyond Growth. The Economics of Sustainable Development; Beacon Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1996; p. 253.
49. Klugman, J.; Rodriquez, F.; Beejadhur, S.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Chatterjee, M.; Choi, H.J.; Fuchs, A.; Heger, M.P.; Kehayova, V.; Pineda, J.; et al. Human Development Report 2011. Sustainability and Equity: A Better Future for All; Published for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP); Palgrave MacMillan: New York, NY, USA, 2011. Available online:http://www.us.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/corporate/HDR/2011%20Global%20HDR/ English/HDR_2011_EN_Complete.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2013).
50. Büchs, M.; Bardsley, N.; Duwe, S. Who bears the brunt? Distributional effects of climate change mitigation policies. Crit. Soc. Pol. 2011, 31, 285-307.
51. Lawlor, E.; Kersley, H.; Steed, S. A Bit Rich. Calculating the Real Value to Society of Different Professions; New Economics Foundation: London, UK, 2009. Available online: http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/entry/a-bit-rich (accessed on 27 February 2014).
52. Victor, P.A. Questioning economic growth. Nature 2010, 468, 370-371.
53. Coote, A.; Franklin, J.; Simms, A. 21 Hours. Why a Shorter Working Week can Help Us All to Flourish in the 21st Century; New Economics Foundation: London, UK, 2010. Available online: http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/entry/21-hours (accessed on 27 February 2014).
54. MacGregor, S. Citizenship and Care. In Understanding the Environment and Social Policy; Fitzpatrick, T., Ed.; Policy Press and Social Policy Association: Bristol, UK, 2011; pp. 271-289.
55. Norton, C. Social work and the environment: An ecosocial approach. Int. J. Soc. Welf. 2012, 21, 299-308.
56. Haubenhofer, D.K.; Elings, M.; Hassink, J.; Hine, R.E. The Development of Green Care in Western European Countries. Explore J. Sci. Heal. 2010, 6, 106-111.
57. Hamilton, C. Consumerism, self-creation and prospects for a new ecological consciousness. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 571-575.
58. Kilpinen, E. Human Beings as Creatures of Habit. In The Habits of Consumption; Warde, A., Southarton, D., Eds.; Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies: Helsinki, Finland, 2012; pp. 45-69. Available online: https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/34221 (accessed on 28 January 2014).
59. Of European origin, the ideology of man's domination over nature has permeated the deepest layers of consciousness not only in western civilization but in nearly every culture on the planet.
60. Meadows, D. Indicators and Information Systems for Sustainable Development. A Report to the Balaton Group; The Sustainability Institute: Hartland, VT, USA, 1998. Available online: http://www.iisd.org/pdf/s_ind_2.pdf (accessed on 3 May 2013).
61. Sen, A.K. The Idea of Justice; The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; p. 467.
62. Allardt, E. Dimensions of welfare in a Comparative Scandinavian Study. Acta. Sociol. 1976, 19, 227-239.
63. It is often thought that Maslow's theory of needs is strictly hierarchical and quite rigid. Yet, Maslow saw human needs as relatively fluid, with many needs being present simultaneously [26].