Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2013, Issue 9, 2013, Pages

  Watkinson, Simon ^a   Harrison, Jayne E ^b   Furness, Susan ^c   Worthington, Helen V ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY DENTAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EVENT; AGE; CHILD; DISEASE ASSESSMENT; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; ORTHODONTIC PROCEDURE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; THERAPY EFFECT; TIME TO TREATMENT; ADOLESCENT; MASK; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; EXTRAORAL TRACTION APPLIANCES; HUMANS; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MASKS; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84899149738     PISSN: 14651858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003451.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Abdelnaby YL, Nassar EA. Chin cup effects using two different force magnitudes in the management of Class III malocclusions. Angle Orthodontist 2010;80(5):957-62.
2. Arun T, Erverdi N. A cephalometric comparison of mandibular headgear and chin-cap appliances in orthodontic and orthopaedic view points. Journal of Marmara University Dental Faculty 1994;2(1):392-8.
3. Atalay Z, Tortop T. Dentofacial effects of a modified tandem traction bow appliance. European Journal of Orthodontics 2010;32(6):655-61.
4. Keles A, Tokmak EC, Erverdi N, Nanda R. Effect of varying the force direction on maxillary orthopedic protraction. Angle Orthodontist 2002;72(5):387-96.
5. Mandall N, Cousley R, DiBiase A, Dyer F, Littlewood S, Mattick R, et al.Is early class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 15-month follow-up. Journal of Orthodontics 2010;37(3):149-61.
6. Mandall NA, Cousley R, DiBiase A, Dyer F, Littlewood S, Mattick R, et al.Is early class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 3-year follow-up. Journal of Orthodontics 2012;39(3):176-85.
7. Vaughn GA, Mason B, Moon HB, Turley PK. The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: A prospective, randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2005;128(3):299-309.
8. Xu B, Lin J. The orthopedic treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion with maxillary protraction therapy. Chinese Journal of Stomatology 2001;36(6):401-3.
9. Altuğ Z, Erdem D, Rübendüz M. Investigation of the effect of functional treatment in skeletal Class III cases on the profile facial esthetics. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 1989;3(1):39-44.
10. Arman AA, Toygar TU, Abuhijleh E. Profile changes associated with different orthopedic treatment approaches in Class III malocclusions. Angle Orthodontist 2004;74(6):733-40.
11. Arman A, Toygar TU, Abuhijleh E. Evaluation of maxillary protraction and fixed appliance therapy in Class III patients. European Journal of Orthodontics 2006;28(4):383-92.
12. Baik HS. Clinical results of the maxillary protraction in Korean children. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1995;108(6):583-92.
13. Barrett AAF, Baccetti T, McNamara Jr. JA. Treatment effects of the light-force chincup. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2010;138(4):468-76.
14. Biren S, Erverdi N. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary retrognathism cases treated with FR-3 appliance. Journal of Marmara Univerisity Dental Faculty 1993;1(4):354-60.
15. Cozza P, Marino A, Mucedero M. An orthopaedic approach to the treatment of Class III malocclusions in the early mixed dentition. European Journal of Orthodontics 2004;26(2):191-9.
16. El H, Ciger S. Effects of 2 types of facemasks on condylar position. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2010;137(6):801-8.
17. Gokalp H, Guney V, Kurt G. Late growth period orthopedic therapy versus bimaxillary surgery for correction of skeletal Class III. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2010;21(3):741-7.
18. Goyenc Y, Ersoy S. The effect of a modified reverse headgear force applied with a facebow on the dentofacial structures. European Journal of Orthodontics 2004;26(1):51-7.
19. Isci D, Turk T, Elekdag-Turk S. Activation-deactivation rapid palatal expansion and reverse headgear in Class III cases. European Journal of Orthodontics 2010;32(6):706-15.
20. Jamilian A, Haraji A, Showkatbakhsh R, Valaee N. The effects of miniscrew with Class III traction in growing patients with maxillary deficiency. International Journal of Orthodontics 2011;22(2):25-30.
21. Kurt H, Alioglu C, Karayazgan B, Tuncer N, Kilicoglu H. The effects of two methods of Class III malocclusion treatment on temporomandibular disorders. European Journal of Orthodontics 2011;33(6):636-41.
22. Mucedero M, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Cozza P. Effects of maxillary protraction with or without expansion on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class III subjects. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2007;135(6):777-81.
23. Pavoni C, Mucedero M, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Polimeni A, Cozza P. The effects of facial mask/bite block therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion. Progress in Orthodontics 2009;10(1):20-8.
24. Sar C, Arman-Ozcirpici A, Uckan S, Yazici AC. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2011;139(5):636-49.
25. Tortop T, Keykubat A, Yuksela S. Facemask therapy with and without expansion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2007;132(4):467-74.
26. Ucem TT, Ucuncu N, Yüksel S. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2004;126(6):672-9.
27. Ulgen M, Firatli S. The effects of the Frankel's function regulator on the Class III malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1994;105(6):561-7.
28. Wilmes B, Olthoff G, Drescher D. Comparison of skeletal and conventional anchorage methods in conjunction with pre-operative decompensation of a skeletal Class III malocclusion. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 2009;70(4):297-305.
29. Yagci A, Uysal T. Effect of modified and conventional facemask therapy on condylar position in Class III patients. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research 2010;13(4):246-54.
30. Yagci A, Uysal T, Usumez S, Orhan M. Effects of modified and conventional facemask therapies with expansion on dynamic measurement of natural head position in Class III patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2011;140(5):e223-31.
31. De Clerck H, Cevidanes L, Baccetti T. Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: A controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2010;138(5):577-81.
32. de Toffol L, Pavoni C, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Cozza P. Orthopedic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthodontist 2008;78(3):561-73.
33. Dermaut LR, Aelbers CMF. Orthopedics in orthodontics: Fiction or reality. A review of the literature, Part II. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1996;110(6):667-71.
34. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991;337(8746):867-72.
35. el-Mangoury NH, Mostafa YA. Epidemiologic panorama of dental occlusion. Angle Orthodontist 1990;60(3):207-13.
36. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
37. Jäger A, Braumann B, Kim C, Wahner S. Skeletal and dental effects of maxillary protraction in patients with angle Class III malocclusion [Therapieeffekte der maxillären Protraktion bei Patienten mit einer Angle-Klasse III]. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 2001;62(4):275-84.
38. Kim JH, Viana MAG, Graber TM, Omerza FF, BeGole EA. The effectiveness of protraction face mask therapy: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1999;115(6):675-85.
39. Liu ZP, Li CJ, Hu HK, Chen JW, Li F, Zou SJ. Efficacy of short-term chincup therapy for mandibular growth retardation in Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthodontist 2011;81(1):162-8.
40. Mandall NA, McCord JF, Blinkhorn AS, Worthington HV, O'Brien KD. Perceived aesthetic impact of malocclusion and oral self perceptions in 14-15 year old Asian and Caucasian children in Greater Manchester. European Journal of Orthodontics 2000;22(2):175-83.
41. Mohlin B, Ingervall B, Thilander B. Relation between malocclusion and mandibular dysfunction in Swedish men. European Journal of Orthodontics 1980;2(4):229-38.
42. Piers EV, Harris DB, Herzberg DS. Piers-Harris Children's Self-concept Scale (Piers-Harris 2). 2nd Edition. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services, 2002.
43. Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr. Contemporary Orthodontics. 2nd Edition. Vol. 2-16, St Louis, Missouri, USA: Mosby-Year Book, Inc, 1993. [ISBN 0-8016-6393-8]
44. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
45. Shaw WC, Addy M, Ray C. Dental and social effects of malocclusion and effectiveness of orthodontic treatment: a review. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1980;8(1):36-45.
46. Shaw WC, Richmond S, O'Brien KD, Brook P, Stephens CD. Quality control in orthodontics: Indices of treatment need and treatment standards. British Dental Journal 1991;170(3):107-12.
47. Silva RG, Kang DS. Prevalence of malocclusion among Latino adolescents. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2001;119(3):313-5.