Quantitative methods for comparative constitutional law

Practice and Theory in Comparative Law

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 230-257

  Meuwese, Anne ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899088627     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511863301.011     Document Type: Chapter

References (12)

1. B. Ackerman, ‘The Rise of World Constitutionalism’, Virginia Law Review, 83 (1997), 771–802, 773.
2. Cf. D. Law and M. Versteeg, ‘The Evolution and Ideology of Global Constitutionalism’, California Law Review, 99 (2011), 1163–1259.
3. H. Spamann, ‘Large-Sample, Quantitative Research Designs for Comparative Law?’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 57 (2009), 797–810
4. E. Voeten, ‘Clashes in the Assembly’, International Organization, 54 (2000), 185–215.
5. J. H. Merryman, The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America(Stanford University Press, 2007), pp. 61–71.
6. D. W. Drezner, ‘Globalization and Policy Convergence’, International Studies Review, 3 (2001), 53–78.
7. D. Law, ‘Globalization and the Future of Constitutional Rights’, Northwestern University Law Review, 102 (2008), 1277–1350.
8. M. Reimann and R. Zimmermann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law(Oxford University Press), 775-814.
9. J. Bara, et al., ‘Analysing Parliamentary Debate with Computer Assistance’, Swiss Political Science Review, 13 (2007), 577–605.
10. S. Proksch and J. Slapin, ‘Position Taking in European Parliament Speeches’, British Journal of Political Science, 40 (2009), 587–611.
11. K. Benoit, S. Mikhaylov and M. Laver, ‘Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions’, American Journal of Political Science, 53 (2009), 495–513.
12. R. Hirschl, ‘The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 53 (2005), 125–55.