Semi-automatic classification of birdsong elements using a linear support vector machine

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Tachibana, Ryosuke O ^a   Oosugi, Naoya ^a   Okanoya, Kazuo ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; AUDIO RECORDING; BIRDSONG; CLASSIFICATION; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; DATA PROCESSING; FINCH; LONCHURA STRIATA; MALE; MUSIC; NEUROSCIENCE; NONHUMAN; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; VALIDATION PROCESS; VOCALIZATION;

ANIMALS; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SONGBIRDS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 84899068304     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092584     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Okanoya K (2004) The Bengalese finch: a window on the behavioral neurobiology of birdsong syntax. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1016: 724-735.
2. Tchernichovski O, Lints TJ, Deregnaucourt S, Cimenser A, Mitra PP (2004) Studying the song development process: rationale and methods. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1016: 348-363. (Pubitemid 38951475)
3. Anderson SE, Dave AS, Margoliash D (1996) Template-based automatic recognition of birdsong syllables from continuous recordings. J Acoust Soc Am 100: 1209-1219.
4. Kogan JA, Margoliash D (1998) Automated recognition of bird song elements from continuous recordings using dynamic time warping and hidden Markov models: a comparative study. J Acoust Soc Am 103: 2185-2196. (Pubitemid 28209044)
5. Chen Z, Maher RC (2006) Semi-automatic classification of bird vocalizations using spectral peak tracks. J Acoust Soc Am 120: 2974-2984. (Pubitemid 44631731)
6. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector network. Mach Learn 20: 273-297.
7. Dufour O, Artieres T, Glotin H, Giraudet P (2013) Clusterized mel filter cepstral coefficients and support vector machines for bird song identification. Proc of 1st workshop on Machine Learning for Bioacoustics, joint to ICML 2013: 89-93.
8. Mencía EL, Nam J, Lee D-H (2013) Learning multi-labeled bioacoustic samples with an unsupervised feature learning approach. Proc of Neural Information Processing Scaled for Bioacoustics, joint to NIPS 2013: 184-189.
9. Hamaguchi K, Mooney R (2012) Recurrent interactions between the input and output of a songbird cortico-basal ganglia pathway are implicated in vocal sequence variability. J Neurosci 32: 11671-11687.
10. Peeters G, Giordano B, Susini P, Misdariis N, McAdams S (2011) The Timbre Toolbox: extracting audio descriptors from musical signals. J Acoust Soc Am 130: 2902-2916.
11. Peeters G (2004) A large set of audio features for sound description in the Cuidado project, CUIDADO Project Report. URL: http://recherche.ircam.fr/ anasyn/peeters/ARTICLES/Peeters-2003-cuidadoaudiofeatures.pdf.
12. Tchernichovski O, Nottebohm F, Ho CE, Bijan P, Mitra PP (2000) A procedure for an automated measurement of song similarity. Animal Behav 59: 1167-1176.
13. Fan R-E, Chang K-W, Hsieh C-J, Wang X-R, Lin C-J (2008) LIBLINEAR: A library for large linear classification. J Mach Learn Res 9: 1871-1874.
14. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20: 37-46.
15. Rajan R, Doupe A (2013) Behavioral and neural signatures of readiness to initiate a learned motor sequence. Curr Biol 23: 87-93. Technology