Corrigendum to Foundations of sustainability information representation theory: Spatial-temporal dynamics of sustainable systems (International Journal of Geographical Information Science, (2013), 10.1080/13658816.2013.853304);Foundations of sustainability information representation theory: Spatial-temporal dynamics of sustainable systems

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1165-1185

  Nyerges, Timothy ^a   Roderick, Mary ^a   Prager, Steven ^b   Bennett, David ^c   Lam, Nina ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^d LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

human environment relations; ontology; space time information representation; sustainability; sustainable systems

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; GIS; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; SATELLITE DATA; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84899067403     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2014.896495     Document Type: Erratum

References (68)

1. Aguirre, R. and Nyerges, T., In press. An agent-based model of participatory decision making for sustainability management. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation.
2. Bettencourt, L. and Kaur, J., 2011. The evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 108:19540-19545 [online]. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/content/108/49/19540.full.pdf + html?sid=37cc009f-60e4-43ac-90d0-583290d551c8 [Accessed 15 September 2012].
3. Borko, H., 1968. Information science: What is it? American Documentation, 19 (1), 3-5.
4. Brinberg, D. and McGrath, J.E., 1985. Validity and the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Campagna, M., ed., 2005. GIS for sustainable development. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
6. Codd, E. F. 1981. Data models in database management, ACM SIGMOD Record - Proceedings of the workshop on Data abstraction, databases and conceptual modelling, 11 (2), 112-114.
7. Couclelis, H., 2010. Ontologies of geographic information. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (12), 1785-1809.
8. Cumming, G., 2011. Spatial resilience in social-ecological systems. New York, NY: Springer.
9. Cutter, S., et al., 2008. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18, 598-606.
10. Davis, C.A., Jr, Fonseca, F.T., and Camara, G., 2011. Environmental sustainability: the role of geographic information science and SDI in the integration of people and nature. In: T. Nyerges, H. Couclelis, R. McMaster, eds. Handbook of GIS and society. London: Sage, 123-137.
11. European Environment Agency, 1997. Air pollution in Europe 1997. Figure 1. DPSIR framework for linking phenomena [online]. Available from: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/92-9167-059-6-sum/page002.html [Accessed 10 November 2012].
12. Goodchild, M.F., Yuan, M., and Cova, T.J., 2007. Towards a general theory of geographic representation in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21 (3), 239-260.
13. Goulden, M.C., et al., 2013. Limits to resilience from livelihood diversification and social capital in lake social-ecological systems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103 (4), 906-924.
14. Grenon, P. and Smith, B., 2004. SNAP and SPAN: towards dynamic spatial ontology. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 4, 69-103.
15. Gruber, T., 2009. Ontology. In: L. Liu and M. Tamer Özsu, eds. Encyclopedia of database systems, Springer-Verlag [online]. Available from: http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/kst/what-is-an-ontology.html and http://tomgruber.org/writing/ontology-definition-2007.htm [Accessed 10 February 2013].
16. Guarino, N., 1997. Understanding, building, and using ontologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46, 293-310.
17. Hansen, S. and Brown, P., 2011. Sustainability management handbook. Lilburn Georgia: Fairmont Press.
18. Harden, C.P., 2012. Framing and reframing questions of human-environment interaction. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102 (4), 737-747.
19. Holling, C.S., 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1-24.
20. Jankowski, P., et al., 2006. Design considerations for collaborative, spatio-temporal decision support systems. Transactions in GIS, 10 (3), 335-354.
21. Jung, C.T. and Sun, C.H., 2010. Ontology-driven problem solving framework for spatial decision support systems. In: Proceedings, global spatial data handling 12, 19-22 September 2010 [online]. Available from: http://www.gsdi.org/gsdiconf/gsdi12/papers/26.pdf [Accessed 9 October 2012].
22. Kates, R.W., et al., 2001. Sustainability science. Science, 292, 641-642 [online]. Available from: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/var/ezp_site/storage/fckeditor/file/pdfs/centers-programs/centers/mrcbg/programs/ssp/docs/documents/2001/Kates_Science_2001.pdf [Accessed 8 September 2012].
23. Kates, R.W., ed., 2010. Readings in sustainability science and technology. CID Working Paper 213. Cambridge, MA: Center for International Development, Harvard University [online]. Available from: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/var/ezp_site/storage/fckeditor/file/pdfs/centers-programs/centers/cid/publications/faculty/wp/213.pdf [Accessed 8 September 2012].
24. Kates, R.W., 2011a. What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108 (49), 19449-19450 [online]. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1116097108 [Accessed 8 September 2012].
25. Kates, R.W., 2011b. From the unity of nature to sustainability science: ideas and practice. CID Working Paper 218. Cambridge, MA: Center for International Development, Harvard University [online]. Available from: http://rwkates.org/pdfs/a2011.02.pdf [Accessed 8 September 2012].
26. Kemp, K.K., 1997a. Fields as a framework for integrating GIS and environmental process models. Part one: representing spatial continuity. Transactions in GIS, 1 (3), 219-234.
27. Kemp, K.K., 1997b. Fields as a framework for integrating GIS and environmental process models. Part two: specifying field variables. Transactions in GIS, 1 (3), 235-246.
28. Kwan, M.P., 2012. The Uncertain geographic context problem. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102 (5), 958-968.
29. Lam, N.S.N., et al., 2012. Predictors of business return in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. PLoS One, 7 (10), e47935, 1-8.
30. Levin, S., and Clark, W., eds., 2010. Report from toward a science of sustainability conference. Cambridge, MA: Center for Biocomplexity, Princeton University & Sustainability Science Program, Harvard University [online]. Available from: http://www.nsf.gov/mps/dms/documents/SustainabilityWorkshopReport.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2013].
31. Li, N., et al., 2012. An ontology-driven framework and web portal for spatial decision support. Transactions on GIS, 16 (3), 313-329.
32. Lopez-Pellicer, F.J., et al., 2012. An ontology for the representation of spatiotemporal jurisdictional domains in information retrieval systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (4), 579-597.
33. Mebratu, D., 1998. Sustainability and sustainable development: historical and conceptual review. Environmental IMPACT Assessment Review, 18, 493-520.
34. National Research Council, Board on Sustainable Development, 1999. Our common journey: a transition toward sustainability. Washington, DC: National Academy Press [online]. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309067839 [Accessed 9 November 2012].
35. Norberg, J. and Cumming, G., 2008. Complexity theory for a sustainable future. New York, Ny: Columbia University Press.
36. Nyerges, T., 1991. Geographic information abstractions: conceptual clarity for geographic modeling. Environment and Planning A, 23, 1483-1499.
37. Nyerges, T. and Jankowski, P., 2010. Regional and urban GIS: a decision support approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38. Ostrom, E., 2005. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Ostrom, E., 2007. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 15181-15187 [online]. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/content/104/39/15181.full?sid=adaf0bcf-f148-4790-9cf4-326cdd2b381b [Accessed August 15 2013].
40. Ostrom, E., 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325, 419-422.
41. Ostrom, E., 2010. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100, 1-33. Available from: http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.100.3.1 [Accessed 15 August 2013].
42. PNAS - Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 2010. Sustainability science section of website [online]. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/sustainability.shtml [Accessed 10 September 2012].
43. Peuquet, D., 2002. Representations of space and time. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
44. Poteete, A., Janssen, M., and Ostrom, E., 2010. Working together: collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45. Prager, S.D. and Reiners, W., 2009. Historical and emerging practices in ecological topology. Ecological Complexity, 6, 160-171.
46. Prigogine, I. and Nicolis, G., 1977. Self-organization in non-equilibrium systems. New York, NY: Wiley.
47. Pultar, E., et al., 2010. EDGIS: a dynamic GIS based on space time points. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (3), 329-346.
48. Reams, M.A., Lam, N.S.N., and Baker, A., 2012. Measuring capacity for resilience among coastal counties of the US Northern Gulf of Mexico Region. American Journal of Climate Change, 1, 194-204.
49. Scheffer, M. and Carpenter, S., 2003. Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18 (12), 648-656.
50. Scholz, A., Mertens, M., and Steinback, C., 2005. The OCEAN framework - modeling the linkages between marine ecology, fishing economy, and coastal communities. In: D. Wright and A. Scholz, eds. Place matters: geospatial tools for marine science. Redlands: Esri Press, 70-90.
51. Schuurman, N., 2006. Formalization matters: critical GIS and ontology research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96 (4), 726-739.
52. Sebastian, A., Fridman Noy, N., Tudorache, T., Musen, M.A., 2008. A generic ontology for collaborative ontology-development workflows. 16th international conference on knowledge engineering and knowledge management (EKAW 2008), Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 5268, pp. 318-328, September 29 - October 3, 2008, Catania, Italy. New York: Springer.
53. Sinton, D., 1978. The inherent structure of information as a constraint to analysis: Mapped thematic data as a case study. In: G. Dutton, ed. Harvard papers on GIS, vol. 7. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
54. Smith, B. and Mark, D., 2006. Geographical categories: an ontological retrospective. In: P. Fisher, ed. Classics from the international journal of geographical information science. London: Taylor and Francis, 507-512.
55. Steinitz, C. 2012. A framework for geodesign: changing geography by design. Redlands: Esri Press.
56. Stock, K., et al., 2012. To ontologise or not to ontologise: an information model for a geospatial knowledge infrastructure. Computers and Geosciences, 45, 98-108.
57. Tang, W. and Bennett, D., 2010. The explicit representation of context in agent-based models of complex adaptive spatial systems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100 (5), 1128-1155.
58. Turner, B.L. II and Robbins, P., 2008. Land-change science and political ecology: similarities, differences and implications for sustainability science. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 33, 295-316.
59. Walker, B.H. and Salt, D., 2006. Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington, DC: Island Press.
60. Walker, B.H. and Salt, D., 2012. Resilience practice: building capacity to absorb disturbance and maintain. Washington, DC: Island Press.
61. Walters, C.J., 1971. Systems ecology: the systems approach and mathematical models in ecology. In: E.P. Odum, ed. Fundamentals of ecology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
62. Wang, S., 2010. A CyberGIS framework for the synthesis of cyberinfrastructure, GIS, and spatial analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100 (3), 1-23.
63. Wang, S., et al., 2013. CyberGIS Software: a synthetic review and integration roadmap. International Journal of Geographic Information Sciences, in press [online]. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13658816.2013.776049 [Accessed 1 May 2013].
64. Wilson, A.G., 1981. Geography and the environment: systems analytical methods. Chichester: John Wiley.
65. Wilson, A.G., 2000. Complex spatial systems: the modelling foundations of urban and regional analysis. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
66. Worboys, M. and Hornsby-Stewart, K., 2004. From objects to events: GEM, the geospatial event model. In: M. Egenhofer, C. Freksa and H. Miller, eds. Proceedings of GIScience 2004, Aldephia, MD, October 20-23, 2004, lecture notes in computer science, vol 3234. Berlin: Springer, 327-343.
67. World Commission on Environment and Development (WECD), 1987. Our common future: from one earth to one world. UN [online]. Available from: http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf [Accessed 19 October 2012].
68. Yuan, M. and Stewart, K., 2008. Computation and visualization for the understanding of dynamics in geographic domains: a research agenda. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.