Calibrating a cellular automata model for understanding rural-urban land conversion: A Pareto front-based multi-objective optimization approach

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1028-1046

  Cao, Kai ^a,b   Huang, Bo ^c   Li, Manchun ^d   Li, Wenwen ^e  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^d NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^e ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

calibration; cellular automata; land conversion; Logit regression; NSGA II; rural urban

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CALIBRATION; CELLULAR AUTOMATON; GENETIC ALGORITHM; LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE PLANNING; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RURAL-URBAN COMPARISON;

EID: 84899059970     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2013.851793     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Batty, M., 1998. Urban evolution on the desktop: simulation with the use of extended cellular automata. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1943-1967.
2. Batty, M. and Torrens, P., 2005. Modeling and prediction in a complex world. Futures, 37 (7), 745-766.
3. Batty, M. and Xie, Y., 1994a. Modelling inside GIS: Part 2. Selecting and calibrating urban models using ARC-INFO. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 8 (5), 451-470.
4. Batty, M. and Xie, Y., 1994b. From cells to cities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 21, 531-548.
5. Batty, M., Xie, Y., and Sun, Z., 1999. Modeling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 23 (1999), 205-233.
6. Brown, D.G., et al., 2005. Path dependance and the validation of agent-based spatial models of land use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19 (2), 153-174.
7. Cao, K., et al., 2011. Spatial multi-objective land use optimization: extensions to the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25 (12), 1949-1969.
8. Clarke, K. and Gaydos, L., 1998. Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12 (7), 699-714.
9. Clarke, K., Hoppen, S., and Gaydos, L., 1997. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24 (2), 247-261.
10. Colonna, A., et al., 1998. Learning urban cellular automata in a real world: The case study of Rome metropolitan area. In: ACRI'98 third conference on cellular automata for research and industry, Trieste, 7-9 October 1998. London: Springer, 165-18.
11. Congalton, R.G., 1988. A comparison of sampling schemes used in generating error matrices for assessing the accuracy of maps generated from remotely sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 54, 593-600.
12. Deb, K., et al., 2000. A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: 6th international conference on parallel problem solving from nature, Paris, France, 18-20 September, 2000 Proceedings. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 849-858.
13. Deb, K., et al., 2002. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6 (2), 182-197.
14. Feng, Y. and Liu, Y., 2012. An optimised cellular automata model based on adaptive genetic algorithm for urban growth simulation. In: W. Shi, A. Yeh, Y. Leung & C. Zhou, eds. Advances in spatial data handling and GIS: 14th international symposium on spatial data handling. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 27-38.
15. Feng, Y. and Liu, Y., 2013. A heuristic cellular automata approach for modelling urban land-use change based on simulated annealing. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (3), 449-466.
16. Goldberg, D.E., 1989. Genetic algorithms in search. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
17. Goldstein, N.C., 2003. Brains vs. brawn - Comparative strategies for the calibration of a cellular automata-based urban growth model. In: 7th international conference on geocomputation. Southampton, UK, 8-10 September 2003 Proceedings. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 249-272.
18. Huang, B., Zhang, L., and Wu, B., 2009. Spatiotemporal analysis of rural-urban land conversion. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23 (3), 21.
19. Kok, K., et al., 2001. A method and application of multi-scale validation in spatial land use models. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 85 (1-3), 223-238.
20. Landis, J. and Zhang, M., 1998. The second generation of the California urban futures model, Part 2: Specification and calibration results of the land use change submodel. Environment and Planning B, 25, 795-842.
21. Li, X. and Liu, X., 2007. Case-based celular automaton for simulating urban development in a large complex region. ActaGeographicaSinica, 62 (10), 1097-1109.
22. Li, X., Yang, Q., and Liu, X., 2007. Genetic algorithms for determining the parameters of cellular automata in urban simulation. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 50, 1857-1866.
23. Li, X. and Yeh, A., 1999. Constrainted cellular automata for modeling sustainable urban forms. ActaGeographicaSinica, 54, 4.
24. Li, X. and Yeh, A.G.-O., 2000. Modelling sustainable urban development by the integration of constrained cellular automata and GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14 (2), 131-152.
25. Li, X. and Yeh, A., 2002. Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16 (4), 323-342.
26. Matthews, K.B., (2001). Applying genetic algorithms to multi-objective land-use planning. Thesis (PhD). The Robert Gordon University.
27. Pontius, G.R. and Malanson, J., 2005. Comparison of the structure and accuracy of two land change models. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19 (2), 243-265. doi:10.1080/13658810410001713434.
28. Shan, J., Alkheder, S., and Wang, J., 2008. Genetic algorithms for the calibration of celluar automata urban growth modeling. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 74 (10), 1267-1277.
29. Silva, E.A. and Clarke, K.C., 2002. Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26 (2002), 525-552.
30. Vliet, J.V., Bregt, A.K., and Hagen, A., 2011. Revisiting Kappa to account for change in the accuracy assessment of land-use change models. Ecological Modelling, 222 (8), 1367-1375.
31. VonNeumann, J. and Burks, A.W., 1966. Theory of self-reproducing automata. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
32. White, R. and Engelen, G., 1993. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environment and Planning A, 25, 1175-1199.
33. White, R. and Engelen, G., 1997. Cellular automata as the basis of integrated dynamic regional modelling. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, 235-246.
34. Wu, F., 1998. SimuLand: a prototype to simulate land conversion through the integrated GIS and CA with AHP-derived transition rules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12, 63-82.
35. Wu, F., 2002. Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: the application to rural-urban land conversions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16 (8), 795-818.
36. Wu, F. and Webster, C.J., 1998. Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multi-criteria evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25, 103-126.
37. Yang, Q., 2008. Dynamic transition rules for geographical cellular automata. Journal of Sun Yatsen University (Natural Science Edition), 47, 4.
38. Yang, Q. and Li, X., 2007. Calibrating urban cellular automata using genetic algorithms. Geographical Research (In Chinese), 26 (2), 226-231.
39. Yang, Q., Li, X., and Shi, X., 2007. Cellular automata for simulating land use changes based on support vector machines. Computers & Geosciences, 34 (6), 592-602.