Evidence for a receiver bias underlying female preference for a male mating pheromone in sea lamprey

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 280, Issue 1771, 2013, Pages

  Buchinger, T J ^a   Wang, H ^a   Li, W ^a   Johnson, N S ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

3kPZS; Communication; Cyclostomata; Lamprey; Mate choice; Receiver bias

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; FISH; HABITAT SELECTION; MALE BEHAVIOR; MATING SUCCESS; MIGRATORY BEHAVIOR; PARASITE; RESIDENT POPULATION; SIGNALING; SPAWNING; SURVIVAL;

ICHTHYOMYZON UNICUSPIS; PETROMYZON; PETROMYZON MARINUS; PETROMYZONTIDAE;

CHOLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PETROMYZONOL SULFATE; SEX PHEROMONE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; CHEMOTAXIS; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; LARVA; MALE; MATE CHOICE; METABOLISM; PETROMYZON; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION MIGRATION; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMAL MIGRATION; ANIMALS; CHEMOTAXIS; CHOLIC ACIDS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; LARVA; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; PETROMYZON; SEX ATTRACTANTS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84899044027     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1966     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Mandrioli M, Malagoli D, Ottaviani E. 2007 Evolution game: which came first, the receptor or the ligand? Inv. Surv. J. 4, 51-54.
2. Andersson M, Simmons LW. 2006 Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 296-302. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.015)
3. Endler JA, Basolo AL. 1998 Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 415-420. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01471-2)
4. Ryan MJ. 1990 Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7, 157-195.
5. Ryan MJ, Fox JH, Wilczynski W, Rand AS. 1990 Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature 343, 66-67. (doi:10.1038/343066a0)
6. Christy JH. 1995 Mimicry, mate choice, and the sensory trap hypothesis. Am. Nat. 146, 171-181. (doi:10.1086/285793)
7. Rodd FH, Hughes KA, Grether GF, Baril CT. 2002 A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 475-481. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1891)
8. Smith C et al. 2004 A receiver bias in the origin of three-spined stickleback mate choice. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 949-955. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2690)
9. Proctor HC. 1991 Courtship in the water mite Neumania papillator: males capitalize on female adaptations for predation. Anim. Behav. 42, 589-598. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80242-8)
10. Proctor HC. 1992 Sensory exploitation and the evolution of male mating behaviour: a cladistic test using water mites (Acari: Parasitengona). Anim. Behav. 44, 745-752. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80300-8)
11. Fuller RC, Houle D, Travis J. 2005 Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences. Am. Nat. 166, 437-446. (doi:10.1086/444443)
12. West-Eberhard MJ. 1984 Sexual selection, competitive communication and species specific signals in insects. In Insect communication (ed. T Lewis), pp. 283-324. Toronto, Canada: Academic Press.
13. Wyatt TD. 2003 Pheromones and animal behaviour. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Sorensen PW, Stacey NE. 1999 Evolution and specialization of fish hormonal pheromones. In Advances in chemical signals in vertebrates (eds RE Johnston, D Muller-Schwarze, PW Sorensen), pp. 15-47. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Murphy CA, Stacey NE, Corkum LD. 2001 Putative steroidal pheromones in the round goby, Neogobius melanostomus: olfactory and behavioural responses. J. Chem. Ecol. 27, 443-470. (doi:10.1023/A1010376503197)
16. Kobayashi M, Sorensen PW, Stacey NE. 2002 Hormonal and pheromonal control of spawning behaviour in the goldfish. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 26, 71-84. (doi:10.1023/A:1023375931734)
17. Yambe H, Kitamura S, Kamio M, Yamada M, Matsunaga S, Fusetani N, Yamazaki F. 2006 L-Kynurenine, an amino acid identified as a sex pheromone in the urine of ovulated female masu salmon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15370-15374. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0604340103)
18. Li W, Scott AP, Siefkes MJ, Yan H, Liu Q, Yun SS, Gage DA. 2002 Bile acid secreted by male sea lamprey that acts as a sex pheromone. Science 296, 138-141. (doi:10.1126/science.1067797)
19. Sorensen PW, Scott AP. 1994 The evolution of hormonal sex pheromones in teleost fish: poor correlation between the pattern of steroid release by goldfish and olfactory sensitivity suggests that these cues evolved as a result of chemical spying rather than signal specialization. Acta Physiol. Scand. 152, 191-205. (doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716. 1994.tb09799.x)
20. Appelt CW, Sorensen PW. 2007 Female goldfish signal spawning readiness by altering when and where they release a urinary pheromone. Anim. Behav. 74, 1329-1338. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav. 2007.02.032)
21. Rosenthal GG, Fitzsimmons JN, Woods KU, Gerlach G, Fisher HS. 2011 Tactical release of a sexuallyselected pheromone in a swordtail fish. PLoS ONE 6, e16994. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016994)
22. Teeter J. 1980 Pheromone communication in sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus): implications for population management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37, 2123-2132. (doi:10.1139/f80-254)
23. Li W. 2005 Potential multiple functions of a male sea lamprey pheromone. Chem. Senses 30, i307-i308. (doi:10.1093/chemse/bjh237)
24. Sorensen PW, Hoye TR. 2007 A critical review of the discovery and application of a migratory pheromone in an invasive fish, the sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus L. J. Fish Biol. 71, 100-114. (doi:10.1111/ j.1095-8649.2007.01681.x)
25. Li W, Sorensen PW, Gallaher DD. 1995 The olfactory system of migratory adult sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) is specifically and acutely sensitive to unique bile acids released by conspecific larvae. J. Gen. Physiol. 105, 569-587. (doi:10.1085/jgp. 105.5.569)
26. Bjerselius R, Li W, Teeter JH, Seelye JG, Johnsen PB, Maniak PJ, Grant GC, Polkinghorne CN, Sorensen PW. 2000 Direct behavioral evidence that unique bile acids released by larval sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) function as a migratory pheromone. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57, 557-569. (doi:10.1139/f99-290)
27. Siefkes MJ, Scott AP, Zielinski B, Yun SS, Li W. 2003 Male sea lampreys, Petromyzon marinus L, excrete a sex pheromone from gill epithelia. Biol. Reprod. 69, 125-132. (doi:10.1095/biolreprod.102. 014472)
28. Siefkes MJ, Winterstein SR, Li W. 2005 Evidence that 3-keto petromyzonol sulphate specifically attracts ovulating female sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. Anim. Behav. 70, 1037-1045. (doi:10.1016/j. anbehav.2005.01.024)
29. Johnson NS, Yun SS, Thompson HT, Brant CO, Li W. 2009 A synthesized pheromone induces upstream movement in female sea lamprey and summons them into traps. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1021-1026. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0808530106)
30. Hubbs CL, Potter IC. 1971 Distribution, phylogeny and taxonomy. In The biology of lampreys, vol. 1 (eds MW Hardisty, IC Potter), pp. 1-77. London, UK: Academic Press.
31. Potter IC. 1980 The Petromyzoniformes with particular reference to paired species. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37, 1595-1615. (doi:10.1139/f80-207)
32. Potter IC, Hilliard RW. 1987 A proposal for the functional and phylogenetic significance of differences in the dentition of lampreys (Agnatha: Petromyzontiformes). J. Zool. 212, 713-737. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1987.tb05966.x)
33. Potter IC, Gill HS. 2003 Adaptive radiation of lampreys. J. Great Lakes Res. 29, 95-112. (doi:10.1016/S0380-1330(03)70480-8)
34. Gill HS, Renaud CB, Chapleau F, Mayden RL, Potter IC, Douglas ME. 2003 Phylogeny of living parasitic lampreys (Petromyzontiformes) based on morphological data. Copeia 2003, 687-703. (doi:10.1643/IA02-085.1)
35. Lang NJ et al. 2009 Novel relationships among lampreys (Petromyzontiformes) revealed by a taxonomically comprehensive molecular dataset. In Biology, management, and conservation of lampreys in North America (eds LR Brown, SD Chase, MG Mesa, RJ Beamish, PB Moyle), pp. 41-56. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.
36. Polkinghorne CN, Olson JM, Gallaher DG, Sorensen PW. 2001 Larval sea lamprey release two unique bile acids to the water at a rate sufficient to produce detectable riverine pheromone plumes. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 24, 15-30. (doi:10.1023/A:1011159313239)
37. Li K, Wang H, Brant CO, Ahn SC, Li W. 2011 Multiplex quantification of lamprey specific bile acid derivatives in environmental water using UHPLC-MS/MSJ. Chromatography 879, 3879-3886. (doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.10.039)
38. Xi X, Johnson NS, Brant CO, Yun SS, Chambers KL, Jones AD, Li W. 2011 Quantification of a male sea lamprey pheromone in tributaries of Laurentian Great Lakes by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 6437-6443. (doi:10.1021/es200416f)
39. Fine JM, Vrieze LA, Sorensen PW. 2004 Evidence that petromyzontid lampreys employ a common migratory pheromone that is partially comprised of bile acids. J. Chem. Ecol. 30, 2091-2110. (doi:10. 1023/B:JOEC.0000048776.16091.b1)
40. Holm S. 1979 A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65-70. (doi:10.2307/4615733)
41. Manion PJ, Hanson LH. 1980 Spawning behavior and fecundity of lampreys from the upper three Great Lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37, 1635-1640. (doi:10.1139/f80-211)
42. Morman RH. 1979 Distribution and ecology of lampreys in the lower peninsula of Michigan, 1957-75. Great Lakes Fish. Comm. Tech. Rep. 33, 1-59.
43. Kucheryavyi AV, Savvaitova KA, Pavlov DS, Gruzdeva MA, Kuzishchin KV, Stanford JA. 2007 Variations of life history strategy of the Arctic lamprey Lethenteron camtschaticum from the Utkholok River (Western Kamchatka). J. Ichthyol. 47, 37-52. (doi:10.1134/S0032945207010055)
44. Lasne E, Sabatié M-R, Evanno G. 2010 Communal spawning of brook and river lampreys (Lampetra planeri and L. fluviatilis) is common in the Oir River (France). Ecol. Freshw. Fish. 19, 323-325. (doi:10. 1111/j.1600-0633.2010.00428.x)
45. Stone J, Lohman K. 2006 Observations on nest characteristics, spawning habitat, and spawning behavior of Pacific and western brook lamprey in a Washington stream. Northw. Nat. 87, 225-232. (doi:10.1898/1051-1733(2006)87[225:OONCSH]2.0. CO;2)
46. Siefkes MJ, Li W. 2004 Electrophysiological evidence for detection and discrimination of pheromonal bile acids by the olfactory epithelium of female sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus). J. Comp. Physiol. A 7 190, 193-199. (doi:10.1007/s00359-003-0484-1)
47. Hardisty MW, Potter IC. 1971 The behaviour, ecology, and growth of larval lampreys. In The biology of lampreys, vol. 1 (eds MW Hardisty, IC Potter), pp. 85-127. London, UK: Academic Press.
48. Dawkins MS, Guilford T. 1996 Sensory bias and the adaptiveness of female choice. Am. Nat. 148, 937-942. (doi:10.1086/285964)
49. Basolo AL. 1996 The phylogenetic distribution of a female preference. Syst. Biol. 45, 290-307. (doi:10. 1093/sysbio/45.3.290)
50. Garcia CM, Ramirez E. 2005 Evidence that sensory traps can evolve into honest signals. Nature 434, 501-505. (doi:10.1038/nature03363)
51. Stuart-Fox D. 2005 Deception and the origin of honest signals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 521-523. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.08.004)
52. Wiens JJ. 2001 Widespread loss of sexually selected traits: how the peacock lost its spots. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 517-523. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02217-0)
53. Houten SM, Watanabe M, Auwerx J. 2006 Endocrine functions of bile acids. EMBO J. 25, 1419-1425. (doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601049)
54. Buck L, Axel R. 1991 A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 65, 175-187. (doi:10.1016/ 0092-8674(91)90418-X)
55. Kittredge JS, Takahashi FT. 1972 The evolution of sex pheromone communication in the Arthropoda. J. Theor. Biol. 35, 467-471. (doi:10.1016/0022-5193(72)90145-2)
56. Steiger S, Schmitt T, Schaefer HM. 2011 The origin and dynamic evolution of chemical information transfer. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 970-979. (doi:10. 1098/rspb.2010.2285)