A decision support tool based on ANP and FMEA to determine cause failures

9th International Conference on Modeling and Applied Simulation, MAS 2010, Held at the International Mediterranean and Latin American Modeling Multiconference, I3M 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 37-46

  De Felice, Fabio ^a   Petrillo, Antonella ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CASSINO AND SOUTHERN LAZIO   (Italy)

Author keywords

ANP; FMEA; Maintenance; Risk analysis

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; FAILURE MODES; MAINTENANCE; RISK ANALYSIS;

ANALYTICAL NETWORK PROCESSES (ANP); ANP; DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS; EUROPEAN TRAIN CONTROL SYSTEMS; FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS; FMEA; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUE; TRADITIONAL APPROACHES;

REPAIR;

EID: 84899020427     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Anthony, N.R., Govindarajan, G., 1998. Management Control. Systems. Irwin McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
2. Bowles, J. B., 2003). An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis. Prec. Ann. Rel. Maint. Symp., IEEE, New York, p. 380.
3. BS 5760, Part 5, Guide to failure modes, effects and criticality analysis (FMEA and FMECA).
4. de Almedia, A.T., Bohoris, G.A., 1995. Decision theory in maintenance decision making. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 1, 39-45.
5. De Felice, F., Petrillo, A., 2009. Proposal of a new model for the optimization of the organizational process in industrial company through the application of the Analytic Network Process. Proceedings of the International Conference on Modelling & Applied Simulation, Porto de la Cruz (Tenerife), 23-25 September.
6. Huang, G.Q., Shi, J., Mak, K.L., 2000. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Over the WWW. International Journal Adavanced Manufacturing Technoly, 16 603-608.
7. Hung, G.Q., Nie, M. and Mark, K.L., 1999. Web-based failure mode and effect analysis, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 37, pp. 177-180.
8. Frosig, P., 1995. ETCS: Requirements to Seamless Cross-Border Operation. International Railway Journal and Rapid Transit Review, 9 September, New York.
9. Kjellen, U., Motet, G., Hale, A., 2009. Resolving multiple criteria decision making involving risk of accident loss. Safety Science 47, 795-797.
10. MIL-HDBK-217, Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment, U.S. Department of Defense.
11. MIL-STD1629A, Procedures for performing a failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis, US Department of Defense.
12. Labib, A.W., O'Connor, R.F., Williams, G.B., 1998. An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process. Integrated Manufacturing Systems 9, 87- 98.
13. Pillay, A., and Wang, J., 2003. Modified Failure Mode and Effects Analysis using Approximate Reasoning. Rel. Eng. Sys. Saf., 79, 69.
14. Puente et al., 2002. A decision support system for applying failure mode and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19 (2) 137-150.
15. Saaty T.L., 2001. Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for decision in a complex world. RWS Publication, Pittsburg (USA).
16. Saaty, T.L., 2005. Theory and Applications of the Analytic network Process: decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. RWS Publications, (Pittsburg, USA).
17. Saaty T. L., Peniwati K., 2007. Group Decision Making: Drawing out and Reconciling Differences. RWS Publications, (Pittsburg, USA).
18. Sachdeva, A., Kumar, D., Kumar, P., 2008. A methodology to determine maintenance criticality using AHP. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Vol. 3, Number 4/2008, 396 - 412.
19. Triantaphyllou, E., Kovalerchuk, B., Mann Jr., L., Knapp, G.M., 1997. Determining most important criteria in maintenance. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 3 Iss: 1, pp.16 - 28.