Linear decision rule as aspiration for simple decision heuristics

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  Şimşek, Özgür ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION HEURISTICS; ENVIRONMENTAL STRUCTURE; LINEAR DECISION RULES; NATURAL ENVIRONMENTS;

EID: 84899018758     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group. Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press, New York, 1999.
2. G. Gigerenzer, R. Hertwig, and T. Pachur, editors. Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior. Oxford University Press, New York, 2011.
3. K. V. Katsikopoulos. Psychological heuristics for making inferences: Definition, performance, and the emerging theory and practice. Decision Analysis, 8(1):10-29, 2011.
4. R. M. Hogarth and N. Karelaia. "Take-the-best" and other simple strategies: Why and when they work "well" with binary cues. Theory and Decision, 61(3):205-249, 2006.
5. M. Baucells, J. A. Carrasco, and R. M. Hogarth. Cumulative dominance and heuristic performance in binary multiattribute choice. Operations Research, 56(5):1289-1304, 2008.
6. J. A. Carrasco and M. Baucells. Tight upper bounds for the expected loss of lexicographic heuristics in binary multi-attribute choice. Mathematical Social Sciences, 55(2):156-189, 2008.
7. L. Martignon and U. Hoffrage. Why does one-reason decision making work? In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group, editors, Simple heuristics that make us smart, pages 119-140. Oxford University Press, New York, 1999.
8. L. Martignon and U. Hoffrage. Fast, frugal, and fit: Simple heuristics for paired comparison. Theory and Decision, 52(1):29-71, 2002.
9. R. M. Hogarth and N. Karelaia. Simple models for multiattribute choice with many alternatives: When it does and does not pay to face trade-offs with binary attributes. Management Science, 51(12):1860-1872, 2005.
10. K. V. Katsikopoulos and L. Martignon. Naïve heuristics for paired comparisons: Some results on their relative accuracy. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50(5):488-494, 2006.
11. K. V. Katsikopoulos. Why do simple heuristics perform well in choices with binary attributes? Decision Analysis, 10(4):327-340, 2013.
12. S. S. Wilks. Weighting systems for linear functions of correlated variables when there is no dependent variable. Psychometrika, 3(1):23-40, 1938.
13. F. L. Schmidt. The relative efficiency of regression and simple unit weighting predictor weights in applied differential psychology. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31:699-714, 1971.
14. R. M. Dawes and B. Corrigan. Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 81(2):95-106, 1974.
15. R. M. Dawes. The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34(7):571-582, 1979.
16. H. J. Einhorn and R. M. Hogarth. Unit weighting schemes for decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(2):171-192, 1975.
17. C. P. Davis-Stober. A geometric analysis of when fixed weighting schemes will outperform ordinary least squares. Psychometrika, 76(4):650-669, 2011.
18. P. C. Fishburn. Lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules: A survey. Management Science, 20(11):1442-1471, 1974.
19. G. Gigerenzer and D. G. Goldstein. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4):650-669, 1996.
20. J. Czerlinski, G. Gigerenzer, and D. G. Goldstein. How good are simple heuristics? In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group, editors, Simple heuristics that make us smart, pages 97-118. Oxford University Press, New York, 1999.
21. H. Zou and T. Hastie. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 67:301-320, 2005.
22. J. Friedman, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software, 33(1):1-22, 2010.
23. S. Geman, E. Bienenstock, and R. Doursat. Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Computation, 4(1):1-58, 1992.
24. H. Brighton and G. Gigerenzer. Bayesian brains and cognitive mechanisms: Harmony or dissonance? In N. Chater and M. Oaksford, editors, The probabilistic mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science, pages 189-208. Oxford University Press, New York, 2008.
25. G. Gigerenzer and H. Brighton. Homo Heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1):107-143, 2009.