Influence of structural and fragility modelling decisions in the loss assessment of RC frame buildings

ECCOMAS Thematic Conference - COMPDYN 2013: 4th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Proceedings - An IACM Special Interest Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 257-271

  Welch, David P ^a   Sullivan, Timothy J ^b  

^a SCUOLA UNIVERSITARIA SUPERIORE IUSS PAVIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Building specific assessment; Expected annual loss; RC frames

Indexed keywords

CIVIL ENGINEERING; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; SEISMOLOGY; STIFFNESS; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS;

ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES; EXPECTED ANNUAL LOSS; HYSTERETIC PROPERTIES; PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; RC FRAMES; SEISMIC EXCITATIONS; SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL MODELLING;

ESTIMATION;

EID: 84899002728     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. C. B. Haselton, G. G. Deierlein, Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Technical Report No. 156, Stanford University, 2007.
2. th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, California, 2006.
3. J. Mitrani-Reiser, J. L. Beck, An ounce of prevention: Probabilistic loss estimation for performance-based earthquake engineering. PhD Dissertation, California Institute of Technology (Caltech), Pasadena, California, 2007.
4. K. A. Porter, An Overview of PEER's Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology. Proceedings of Ninth International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Engineering, San Francisco, California, 2003.
5. C. M. Ramirez, E. Miranda, Building specific loss estimation methods & tools for simplified performance-based earthquake engineering. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Technical Report No. 171, Stanford University, 2009.
6. D. P. Welch, T. J. Sullivan, G. M. Calvi, Developing Direct Displacement-Based Design and Assessment Procedures for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering. ROSE Report 2012/03, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy, 2012.
7. Applied Technology Council, Guidelines for Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings. ATC-58:75% Complete Draft, Redwood City, California, 2011.
8. A. B. Liel, G. G. Deierlein, Assessing the Collapse Risk of California's Existing Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures: Metrics for Seismic Safety Decisions. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Technical Report No. 166, Stanford University, 2008.
9. A. J. Carr, RUAUMOKO-Users Manual, Theory, and Appendices. Vol. 2, User manual for the 2-Dimensional version, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2007.
10. C. B. Haselton, C. A. Goulet, J. L. Beck, G. G. Deierlein, K. A. Porter, J. P. Stewart, E. Taciroglu, An assessment to benchmark the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced concrete moment-frame building. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), Report No. PEER 2007/12, University of California, Berkeley, 2007.
11. L. A. Montejo, M. J. Kowalsky, CUMBIA: Set of codes for the analysis of reinforced concrete members. Technical report No. IS-07-01, Prepared for Alaska Department of Transportation, Constructed Facilities Laboratory, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 2007.
12. M. J. N. Priestley, G. M. Calvi, M. J. Kowalsky, Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy, 2007.
13. PEER, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center: Strong Motion Database, University of California, Berkeley, http://peer.berkeley.edu, 2011.
14. th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, September 24-28, 2012.