Observations of the Crab nebula with the MAGIC telescope

29th International Cosmic Ray Conference, ICRC 2005

Volumn 4, Issue , 2005, Pages 163-166

  Wagner, R M ^a   Lopez, M ^b   Mase, K ^a,f   Domingo Santamaria, E ^c   Goebel, F ^a   Flix, J ^c   Majumdar, P ^a   Mazin, D ^b   Moralejo, A ^d   Paneque, D ^a   Rico, J ^c   Schweizer, T ^e  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c BARCELONA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^e HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^f CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSMIC RAYS; GAMMA RAYS; SHELLFISH; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ANALYSIS METHOD; CRAB NEBULA; LOW ENERGY REGIONS; MAGIC TELESCOPE; TELESCOPE PERFORMANCE;

TELESCOPES;

EID: 84898984828     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. R. Mirzoyan et al., these proceedings.
2. E. Lorenz, New Astron. Rev. 48 (2004) 339.
3. J. Cortina et al., these proceedings.
4. D. Mazin et al., these proceedings.
5. N. Tonello et al., these proceedings.
6. T. Weekes et al., Astrophys. J. 342 (1998) 379.
7. F. A. Aharonian et al, Astrophys. J. 614 (2004) 897.
8. O. C. de Jager and A. K. Harding, Astrophys. J. 396 (1992) 161.
9. M. Gaug et al., these proceedings.
10. T. Schweizer et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 49 (2002) 2497.
11. F. Goebel et al., these proceedings.
12. L. Breiman, Machine Learning 45 (2001) 5.
13. R. K. Bock et al., Nucl. Instr. &Meth. A 516 (2004) 511.
14. E. Domingo.Santamaria et al., these proceedings.
15. A. M. Hillas et al, Astrophys. J. 503 (1988) 744.