Concept learning as motor program induction: A large-scale empirical study

Building Bridges Across Cognitive Sciences Around the World - Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 659-664

  Lake, Brenden M ^a   Salakhutdinov, Ruslan ^b   Tenenbaum, Joshua B ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

concept learning; one shot learning; program induction; structured representations

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT LEARNING; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; INTERNAL STRUCTURE; LARGE-SCALES; MOTOR PROGRAMS; NOVEL CONCEPT; ONE-SHOT LEARNING; POWER; PROGRAM INDUCTION; STRUCTURED REPRESENTATION;

EID: 84898967430     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Jounral of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 80(3).
2. Bloom, P. (2000). How Children Learn the Meanings of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Carey, S., & Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 15, 17–29.
4. Feldman, J. (1997). The structure of perceptual categories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 145–170.
5. Freyd, J. (1983). Representing the dynamics of a static form. Memory and Cognition, 11(4), 342–346.
6. Geman, S., Bienenstock, E., & Doursat, R. (1992). Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma. Neural Computation, 4, 1–58.
7. Goodnow, J. J., & Levine, R. A. (1973). “The Grammar of Action”: Sequence and syntax in childen’s copying. Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 82–98.
8. Grainger, J., Rey, A., & Dufau, S. (2008). Letter perception: from pixels to pandemonium. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(10), 381–387.
9. Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992, July). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99(3), 480–517.
10. Kemp, C., & Jern, A. (2009). Abstraction and relational learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22.
11. Kemp, C., Perfors, A., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Learning overhypotheses with hierarchical Bayesian models. Developmental Science, 10(3), 307–321.
12. Lake, B. M., Salakhutdinov, R., Gross, J., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2011). One shot learning of simple visual concepts. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Cognitive Science Conference.
13. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74(6), 431–461.
14. Lovett, A., Dehghani, M., & Forbus, K. (2007). Incremental Learning of Perceptual Categories for Open-Domain Sketch Recognition Kenneth Forbus Comparisons and Generalization. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
15. Markman, E. M. (1989). Categorization and Naming in Children. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92(3), 289–316.
17. Rosch, E., Simpson, C., & Miller, R. S. (1976). Structural bases of typicality effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(4), 491–502.
18. Rubinstein, R. Y., & Kroese, D. P. (2008). Simulation and the Monte Carlo method (Second ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
19. Sakoe, H., & Chiba, S. (1978, February). Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 26(1), 43–49.
20. Salakhutdinov, R., & Hinton, G. E. (2009). Deep Boltzmann Machines. In 12th Internationcal Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS).
21. Salakhutdinov, R., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Torralba, A. (2011). Hierarchical deep models for one-shot learning. In Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS).
22. Savova, V., Jakel, F., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009). Grammar-based object representations in a scene parsing task. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
23. Schyns, P. G., Goldstone, R. L., & Thibaut, J.-P. (1998). The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1–54.
24. Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a Universal Law of Generalization for Psychological Science. Science, 237(4820), 1317–1323.
25. Smith, L. B., Jones, S. S., Landau, B., Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Samuelson, L. (2002). Object Name Learning Provides On-the-Job Training for Attention. Psychological Science, 13, 13–19.
26. Stuhlmuller, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Goodman, N. D. (2010). Learning Structured Generative Concepts. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
27. Tenenbaum, J. B., & Griffiths, T. L. (2001, August). Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(4), 629–40.
28. Van Sommers, P. (1984). Drawing and Cognition. Cambridge University Press.
29. Wang, W., Pollak, I., Wong, T.-S., Bouman, C., Harper, M., & Siskind, J. (2006, October). Hierarchical Stochastic Image Grammars for Classification and Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15(10), 3033–3052.
30. Winston, P. H. (1975). Learning structural descriptions from examples. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Xu, F., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Word Learning as Bayesian Inference. Psychological Review, 114(2), 245–272.
32. Zhu, L., Chen, Y., & Yuille, A. (2009, January). Unsupervised learning of Probabilistic Grammar-Markov Models for object categories. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31(1), 114–28.