Comparing analytic performance criteria: Evaluation of HbA1c certification criteria as an example

Clinica Chimica Acta

Volumn 433, Issue , 2014, Pages 259-263

  Rohlfing, Curt L ^a   Parvin, Curtis A ^b   Sacks, David B ^c   Little, Randie R ^a  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

^b BIO RAD LABORATORIES   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Analytical bias; Analytical imprecision

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN;

ANALYTICAL BIAS; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ANALYTICAL IMPRECISION; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS CRITERION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEMOGLOBIN ANALYSIS; LABORATORY BIAS; LIMIT OF DETECTION; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NATIONAL GLYCOHEMOGLOBIN STANDARDIZATION PROGRAM CERTIFICATION CRITERION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; BLOOD; BLOOD ANALYSIS; CERTIFICATION; DIABETES MELLITUS; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; STANDARD; STANDARDS; STATISTICS;

BLOOD CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CERTIFICATION; DIABETES MELLITUS; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; REFERENCE STANDARDS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84898964771     PISSN: 00098981     EISSN: 18733492     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.03.034     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993, 329:977-986.
2. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group, intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998, 352:837-853.
3. American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1994, 17:616-623.
4. College of American Pathologists, electrophoresis/chromatography survey 1993, set EC-C, Northfield, Illinois 1993.
5. Little R.R., Rohlfing C.L. Sacks DB for the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) Steering Committee, status of hemoglobin A1c measurement and goals for improvement: from chaos to order for improving diabetes care. Clin Chem 2011, 57:205-214.
6. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 327:307-310.