Publicized Sobriety checkpoint programs: A community guide systematic review

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 529-539

  Bergen, Gwen ^b   Pitan, Adesola ^a   Qu, Shuli ^a   Shults, Ruth A ^b   Chattopadhyay, Sajal K ^a   Elder, Randy W ^a   Sleet, David A ^b   Coleman, Heidi L ^c   Compton, Richard P ^c   Nichols, James L ^c   Clymer, John M ^e   Calvert, William B ^d  

^a Services Inc   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR INJURY PREVENTION AND CONTROL   (United States)

^c NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION   (United States)

^d Medical Corps   (United States)

^e National Forum for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ALCOHOL IMPAIRED DRIVING; ARTICLE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DRUNKEN DRIVING; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; EMBASE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MEDLINE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PSYCINFO; PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEM; PUBLICIZED SOBRIETY CHECKPOINT PROGRAM; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRAFFIC MEDICINE; TRAFFIC SAFETY; ALCOHOLIC INTOXICATION; BREATH ANALYSIS; CAR DRIVING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; ECONOMICS; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; UNITED STATES;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ALCOHOLIC INTOXICATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; BREATH TESTS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; RISK FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84898962222     PISSN: 07493797     EISSN: 18732607     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.018     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. G. Bergen, R. Shults, and R. Rudd Vital signs: alcohol-impaired driving among adults - U.S., 2010 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 60 39 2011 1351 1356
2. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Traffic Safety Facts 2012 Motor Vehicle Crashes: Overview. DOT HS 811 856 2013 U.S. Department of Transportation, NHTSA Washington DC
3. Zaloshnja E, Miller TR, Blincoe LJ. Costs of alcohol-involved crashes, U.S., 2010. Paper presented at the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine Conference: 2013 September; Quebec City, QC, Canada.
4. R.A. Shults, R.W. Elder, and D.A. Sleet et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving Am J Prev Med 21 4S 2001 66 88
5. A. Erke, C. Goldenbeld, and T. Vaa The effects of drink-driving checkpoints on crashes - a meta-analysis Accid Anal Prev 41 5 2009 914 923
6. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Crime in the U.S. 2010 Uniform Crime Reports, Table 29. www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in- the-u.s.-2010/tables/10tbl29.xls.
7. H. Ross The deterrent capability of sobriety checkpoints: Summary of the American literature. DOT HS 807 862 1992 U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington DC
8. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration The use of safety checkpoints for DWI enforcement. DOT HS 857 606 1983 U.S. Department of Transporation, NHTSA Washington DC
9. U.S. Supreme Court. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990). Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan. No. 88-1897.
10. Govenor's Highway Safety Association. Sobriety checkpoint laws, 2012. www.ghsa.org/html/stateinfo/laws/checkpoint-laws.html.
11. A. Williams Alcohol-impaired driving and its consequences in the U.S.: The past 25 years J Safety Res 37 2006 123 138
12. Bureau of the Census, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. Census data to calculate the rate of alcohol-related motor vehicle crash fatalaties and the rate of checkpoints for a population. 2012. www.census.gov/.
13. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Traffic Safety Facts 2010: A compilation of motor vehicle crash data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System. DOT HS 811 659 2012 U.S. Department of Transportation, NHTSA Washington DC
14. P. Briss, S. Zaza, and M. Pappaioanou et al. Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services - methods. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services Am J Prev Med 18 1S 2000 35 43
15. V. Carande-Kulis, M. Maciosek, and P. Briss et al. Methods for systematic reviews of economic evaluations for the Guide to Community Preventive Services Am J Prev Med 18 1S 2000 75 91
16. S. Zaza, V. Carande-Kulis, and D. Sleet et al. Methods for conducting systematic reviews of the evidence of effectiveness and economic efficiency of interventions to reduce injuries to motor vehicle occupants Am J Prev Med 21 4S 2001 23 30
17. S. Zaza, L. Wright-deAguero, and P. Briss et al. Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the Guide to Community Preventive Services. Task Force on Community Preventive Services Am J Prev Med 18 1S 2000 44 74
18. World Bank. World Bank list of economies, 2012. http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/World-Bank-high-income-economy.
19. R. Subramanian Transitioning to multiple imputation - a new method to estimate missing blood alcohol concentration (BAC) values in FARS. Report No: DOT HS 809 403 2002 U.S. Department of Transporation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington DC
20. J. Clapp, M. Johnson, R. Voas, J. Lange, A. Shillington, and C. Russell Reducing DUI among U.S. college students: results of an environmental prevention trial Addiction 100 3 2005 327 334
21. Fell J, Langston E, Tippetts A. Evaluation of four state impaired driving enforcement demonstration programs: Georgia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania and Louisiana. In: 49th Annual proceedings - Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, September 12-14; 2005; Boston MA.
22. J.H. Lacey, S.A. Ferguson, T. Kelley-Baker, and R.P. Rider Low-manpower checkpoints: Can they provide effective DUI enforcement in small communities? Traffic Inj Prev 7 3 2006 213 218
23. J. Lacey, and R. Jones Evaluation of changes in New Mexico's anti-DWI efforts 2000 U.S. Department of Transporation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington DC www.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/research/newmexico-dwi/ newmexico-DWI.html
24. J. Lacey, T. Kelly-Baker, K. Brainard, S. Tippetts, and M. Lyakhovich Evaluation of the Checkpoint Strikeforce Program. DOT HS 811 056 2008 U.S. Department of Transporation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington DC
25. T. Miller, M. Blewden, and J. Zhang Cost savings from a sustained compulsory breath testing and media campaign in New Zealand Accid Anal Prev 36 5 2004 783 794
26. S. Nunn, and W. Newby The geography of deterrence Eval Rev 35 4 2011 354 378
27. J. Stuster Creating impaired driving general deterrence: eight case studies of sustained, high-visibility, impaired-driving enforcement. DOT HS 809 950 2006 U.S. Department of Transporation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington DC
28. J. Syner, B. Jackson, L. Dankers, B. Naff, S. Hancock, and J. Siegler Strategic Evaluation States Initiative - Case studies of Alaska, Georgia, and West Virginia. Impaired driving report. DOT HS 810 923 2006 U.S. Department of Transporation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Impaired Driving & Occupant Protection Washington DC
29. T.J. Zwicker, N.K. Chaudhary, S. Maloney, and R. Squeglia Connecticut's 2003 Impaired-Driving High-Visibility Enforcement Campaign. DOT HS 810 689 2007 U.S. Department of Transporation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington DC
30. J. Lacey, R. Jones, and R. Smith Evaluation of Checkpoint Tennessee: Tennessee's statewide sobriety checkpoint program. Contract #DTNH22-94-C-05064 1999 U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Safety Traffic Safety Administration Washington DC
31. R. Arthurson Evaluation of random breath testing 1985 Traffic Authority of New South Wales Sydney, Australia
32. T. Miller, M. Galbraith, and B. Lawrence Costs and benefits of a community sobriety checkpoint program J Stud Alcohol 59 4 1998 462 468
33. J. Stuster, and P. Blowers Experimental evaluation of sobriety checkpoint programs. DOT HS 208 887 1995 U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Safety Traffic Administration Washington DC
34. Wessemann P. Costs and benefits of police enforcement in the Netherlands. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs & Traffic Safety; 1989 Oct 24-27; Chicago IL.
35. K. Diamantopoulou, M. Cameron, and M. Shtifelman Index to measure traffic enforcement effectiveness in each police region of Victoria. Report No. 172 2000 Monash University Accident Research Centre Victoria, Australia
36. J. Guria, and J. Leung An evaluation of a supplementary road safety package 2002 25th Australasian Transport Research Forum Canberra
37. R. Tay The effectiveness of enforcement and publicity campaigns on serious crashes involving young male drivers: are drink driving and speeding similar? Accid Anal Prev 37 2005 922 929
38. J. Fell, J. Lacey, and R. Voas Sobriety checkpoints: evidence of effectiveness is strong, but use is limited Traffic Inj Prev 5 2004 220 227
39. Castle S, Thompson J, Spataro J, et al. Early evaluation of a statewide sobriety checkpoint program. In: 39th Annual Proceedings, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine; 1995 Oct 16-18; Chicago IL.
40. National Highway Safety Traffic Administration. Saturation patrols and sobriety checkpoints guide. A how-to guide for planning and publicizing impaired driving enforcement efforts, 2002. DOT HS 809 063 2002 U.S. Department of Transportation, NHTSA Washington DC