Viewpoint invariant face recognition using independent component analysis and attractor networks

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn , Issue , 1997, Pages 817-823

  Bartlett, Marian Stewart ^a   Sejnowski, Terrence J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; FACE RECOGNITION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ATTRACTOR NETWORKS; BASINS OF ATTRACTION; HEBBIAN LEARNING; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS(ICA); TEMPORAL CONTINUITY; TEMPORAL FILTERS; VIEWPOINT INVARIANT; VISUAL EXPERIENCES;

INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84898956124     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bartlett, M. Stewart, & Sejnowski, T., 1996. Unsupervised learning of invariant representations of faces through temporal association. Computational Neuroscience: Int. Rev. Neurobio. Suppl. 1 J.M Bower, Ed., Academic Press, San Diego, CA:317-322.
2. Beymer, D. 1994. Face recognition under varying pose. In Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Los Alami-tos, CA: IEEE Comput. Soc. Press: 756-61.
3. Bell, A. & Sejnowski, T., (1997). The independent components of natural scenes are edge filters. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 9.
4. Bell, A., & Sejnowski, T., 1995. An information Maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comp. 7: 1129-1159.
5. Comon, P. 1994. Independent component analysis-a new concept? Signal Processing 36:287-314.
6. Cottrell & Metcalfe, 1991. Face, gender and emotion recognition using Holons. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 3, D. Touretzky, (Ed.), Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA: 564-571.
7. Foldiak, P. 1991. Learning invariance from transformation sequences. Neural Comp. 3:194200.
8. Griniasty, M., Tsodyks, M., & Amit, D. 1993. Conversion of temporal correlations between stimuli to spatial correlations between attractors. Neural Comp. 5:1-17.
9. Hasselmo M. Rolls E. Baylis G. & Nalwa V. 1989. Object-centered encoding by face-selective neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey. Experimental Brain Research 75(2):417-29.
10. Heeger, D. (1991). Nonlinear model of neural responses in cat visual cortex. Computational Models of Visual Processing, M. Landy & J. Movshon, Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. Makeig, S, Bell, AJ, Jung, T-P, and Sejnowski, TJ 1996. Independent component analysis of Electroencephalographic data, In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8, 145-151.
12. Rhodes, P. 1992. The long open time of the NMDA channel facilitates the self-organization of invariant object responses in cortex. Soc. Neurosci. Abst. 18:740.
13. Rumelhart, D. & Zipser, D. 1985. Feature discovery by competitive learning. Cognitive Science 9:75-112
14. Turk, M., & Pentland, A. 1991. Eigenfaces for Recognition. J. Cog. Neurosci. 3(l):71-86.
15. Wallis, G. & Rolls, E. 1996. A model of invariant object recognition in the visual system. Technical Report, Oxford University Department of Experimental Psychology.