Reducing computing time of energy system models by a myopic approach: A case study based on the PERSEUS-NET model

Energy Systems

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 65-83

  Babrowski, Sonja ^a   Heffels, Tobias ^a   Jochem, Patrick ^a   Fichtner, Wolf ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Energy system modelling; Myopic; Perfect foresight; PERSEUS

Indexed keywords

ENERGY MANAGEMENT; ENERGY RESOURCES;

ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION NETWORKS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION SYSTEM; ENERGY SYSTEM MODELLING; LINEAR OPTIMIZATION MODEL; MYOPIC; PERFECT FORESIGHTS; PERSEUS; REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84898954719     PISSN: 18683967     EISSN: 18683975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12667-013-0085-1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Möst, D., Genoese, M., Eßer, A., Renz, O.: European electricity and emission market modeling-the design of emission allocation plants and its effects on investment planning. Paper presented at the 5th Conference on European electricity market (EEM), Lisbon (2008)
2. Loulou, R., Remme, U., Kanudia, A., Lehtila, A., Goldstein, G.: Documentation for the TIMES model. http://www.iea-etsap.org/web/Documentation. asp (2005)
3. Martinsen, D., Krey, V., Markewitz, P., Vögele, S.: A new dynamical bottom-up energy model for Germany: model structure and model results. Paper presented at the 6th IAEE European Conference, Zürich (2004)
4. Rosen, J.: The future role of renewable energy sources in European electricity supply: a model-based analysis for the EU-15. Dissertation, Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe (2008)
5. Nagl, S., Fürsch, M., Paulus, M., Richter, J., Trüby, J., Lindenberger, D.: Energy policy scenarios to reach challenging climate projection targets in the German electricity sector until 2050. Utility Policy 19(3), 8 (2011)
6. BMWi, BMU: The Federal government's energy concept of 2010 and the transformation of the energy system of 2011. In: N.C.a.N.S. (ed) Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology and Federal Ministry for the Environment, Berlin (2011)
7. EIA: System for the analysis of global energy markets (SAGE). Model documentation report, energy information administration, U.S. Department of Energy (2003)
8. IIASA: Myopic MESSAGE-a model to analyze energy systems and to evaluate policies over a short-to-medium time horizon. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/ research/researchPrograms/Energy/ MYOPIC-MESSAGE.en.html (2012)
9. Martinsen, D., Krey, V., Markewitz, P., Vögele, S.: A time step energy process model for Germany: model structure and results. Energy Stud. Rev. 14(1), 3 (2006)
10. Krey, V.: Vergleich kurz-und langfristig ausgerichteter Optimierungsansätze mit einem multiregionalen Energiesystemmodell unter Berücksichtigung stochastischer Parameter.Dissertation, Ruhr-Universität Bochum (2006)
11. Fishbone, L.G., Abilock, H.: MARKAL: a linear programming model for energy system analysis-technical description on the BNL version. Intern. J. Energy Res. 5/4, 21 (1981)
12. Messner, S.: User's guide for the matrix generator ofmessage II: model description and implementation guide. IASA WP 84-71a, Laxenburg (1984)
13. Keppo, I., Strubegger, M.: Short term decisions for long term problems: the effect of foresight on model based energy systems analysis. Energy 35(5), 2033-2042 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010. 01.019
14. Babiker, M., Gurgel, A., Paltsev, S., Reilly, J.: Forward-looking versus recursive-dynamic modeling in climate policy analysis: a comparison. Econ. Model. 26, 14 (2009)
15. Enzensberger, N.: Entwicklung und Anwendung eines Strom-und Zertifikatmarktmodells für den europäischen Energiesektor. Dissertation, Universität Karlsruhe (2003)
16. Schönfelder, M., Jochem, P., Fichtner, W.: Energiesystemmodelle zur Szenarienbildung-Potentiale und Grenzen. In: Dieckhoff, C., (ed.) Energieszenarien. Konstruktion, Bewertung und Wirkung-"Anbieter" und "Nachfrager" im Dialog. KIT Scientific Publishing, Karlsruhe (2011)
17. Keppo, I., Strubegger, M.: Implications of limited foresight and sequential decision making for longterm energy system planning: an application of the myopic MESSAGE model. In: Interim Report IR-09-006. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg (2009)
18. Chand, S., Hsu, V.N., Sethi, S.: Forecast, solution, and rolling horizons in operations management problems: a classified bibliography. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 4(1), 25-43 (2001). doi:10.1287/ msom.4.1.25.287
19. Eßer-Frey, A.: Analyzing the regional long-term development of the German power system using a nodal priceing approach. Dissertation, Karlsruher Institute of Technologie (2012)
20. Nolden, C., Schönfelder, M., Eßer-Frey, A., Bertsch, V., Fichtner, W.: Network constraints in technoeconomic energy system models. Energy Systems (2013). doi:10.1007/s12667-013-0078-0
21. BGBI: EnLAG-Gesetz zur Beschleunigung des Ausbaus der Höchstspannungsnetze. In: Bundesanzeiger (ed.). p. 2870. Bundesgestzblatt I (2009)
22. BMU: Pilot study 2010. In: Ministry, G.F.E. (ed.). Berlin (2010)
23. Eßer-Frey, A., Fichtner,W.: Analyzing the regional development of the German power system using a nodal pricing approach. Paper presented at the 8th Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM), Zagreb (2011)
24. Gass, S.I.: Linear programming: methods and applications, 5th edn. Dover Publications (2010)
25. IEA: World energy outlook. International Energy Agency, France (2008)
26. Platts: World electric power plants database. Platts, Washington (2005)
27. Nöther, A.: Kraftwerke-online. Database, http://www.kraftwerke- online.de (2012)