Analyzing and modeling rheological behavior of liver fibrosis in rats using shear viscoelastic moduli

Journal of Zhejiang University: Science B

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 375-381

  Zhu, Ying ^a   Zheng, Yi ^b   Shen, Yuan Yuan ^a   Chen, Xin ^a   Zhang, Xin Yu ^a   Lin, Hao Ming ^a   Guo, Yan Rong ^a   Wang, Tian Fu ^a   Chen, Si Ping ^a  

^a Shenzhen University School of Medicine   (China)

^b ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological mechanics; Elasticity; Liver fibrosis; Rheological properties; Shear modulus; Viscoelasticity; Viscosity; Voigt model; Zener model

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE COURSE; FLOW KINETICS; HEPATITIS; LIVER FIBROSIS; LIVER FIBROSIS STAGE; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR RATE; VISCOELASTICITY; VOIGT MODEL; YOUNG MODULUS; ZENER MODEL; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; LIVER CIRRHOSIS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; VISCOSITY;

ANIMALS; DISEASE PROGRESSION; ELASTIC MODULUS; LIVER CIRRHOSIS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; RHEOLOGY; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84898943889     PISSN: 16731581     EISSN: 18621783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B1300121     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Asbach, P., Klatt, D., Hamhaber, U., et al., 2008. Assessment of liver viscoelasticity using multifrequency MR elastography. Magn. Reson. Med., 60(2):373-379. [doi:10.1002/mrm.21636]
2. Barry, C.T., Mills, B., Hah, Z., et al., 2012. Shear wave dispersion measures liver steatosis. Ultrasound Med. Biol., 38(2):175-182. [doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.10.019]
3. Catheline, S., Gennisson, J.L., Delon, G., et al., 2004. Measurement of viscoelastic properties of homogeneous soft solid using transient elastography: an inverse problem approach. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 116(6):3734-3741. [doi:10.1121/1.1815075] (Pubitemid 40029953)
4. Chatelin, S., Oudry, J., Périchon, N., et al., 2011. In vivo liver tissue mechanical properties transient elastography: comparison with dynamic mechanical analysis. Biorheology, 48(2):75-88. [doi:10.3233/BIR-2011-0584]
5. Chen, K., Yao, A., Zheng, E.E., et al., 2012. Shear wave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry based on a different mechanical model for soft tissue characterization. J. Ultrasound Med., 31(2):2001-2011.
6. Chen, S., Fatemi, M., Greenleaf, J.F., 2004. Quantifying elasticity and viscosity from measurement of shear wave speed dispersion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 115(6):2781-2785. [doi:10.1121/1.1739480] (Pubitemid 38781209)
7. Chen, S., Urban, M.W., Pislaru, C., et al., 2009. Shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV) for measuring tissue elasticity and viscosity. IEEE Trans. Ultrasonics Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 56(1):55-62. [doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1005]
8. Chen, S., Sanchez, W., Callstrom, M.R., et al., 2013. Assessment of liver viscoelasticity by using shear waves induced by ultrasound radiation force. Radiology, 266(3):964-970. [doi:10.1148/radiol.12120837]
9. Chen, X., Shen, Y., Zheng, Y., et al., 2013. Quantification of liver viscoelasticity with acoustic radiation force: a study of hepatic fibrosis in a rat model. Ultrasound Med. Biol., 39(11):2091-2102. [doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio. 2013.05.020]
10. French METAVIR Cooperative Study Group, 1994. Intraobserver and interobserver variations in liver biopsy interpretation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology, 20(1):15-20. [doi:10.1002/hep.1840200104]
11. Fung, Y.C., 1993. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. Springer, New York. [doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2257-4]
12. Gennisson, J.L., Deffieux, T., Macé, E., et al., 2010. Viscoelastic and anisotropic mechanical properties of in vivo muscle tissue assessed by supersonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med. Biol., 36(5):789-801. [doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.02.013]
13. Huwart, L., Sempoux, C., Salameh, N., et al., 2007. Liver fibrosis: noninvasive assessment with MR elastography versus aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index. Radiology, 245(2):458-466. [doi:10.1148/radiol.2452061673] (Pubitemid 47612527)
14. Joseph, D.D., 1990. Fluid Dynamics of Viscoelastic Liquids. Springer, Berlin. [doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4462-2]
15. Kiss, M.Z., Varghese, T., Hall, T.J., 2004. Viscoelasticity characterization of in vitro canine tissue. Physics Med. Biol., 49(18):4207-4218. [doi:10.1088/0031-9155/49/18/002] (Pubitemid 39302683)
16. Klatt, D., Friedrich, C., Korth, Y., et al., 2010. Viscoelastic properties of liver measured by oscillatory rheometry and multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography. Biorheology, 47(2):133-141. [doi:10.3233/BIR-2010-0565]
17. Macosko, C.W., 1994. Rheology: Principles, Measurements, and Applications. Wiley-VCH, New York.
18. Mitri, F.G., Urban, M.W., Fatemi, M., et al., 2011. Shear wave dispersion ultrasonic vibrometry for measuring prostate shear stiffness and viscosity: an in vitro pilot study. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 58(2):235-242. [doi:10.1109/TBME.2010.2053928]
19. Orescanin, M., Insana, M.F., 2010. Shear modulus estimation with vibrating needle stimulation. IEEE Trans. Ultrasonics Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 57(6):1358-1366. [doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1555]
20. Yeh, W., Li, P., Jeng, Y., et al., 2002. Elastic modulus measurements of human liver and correlation with pathology. Ultrasound Med. Biol., 28(4):467-474. [doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(02)00489-1] (Pubitemid 34603767)
21. Zheng, Y., Chen, S., Tan, W., et al., 2007. Detection of tissue harmonic motion induced by ultrasonic radiation force using pulse-echo ultrasound and Kalman filter. IEEE Trans. Ultrasonics Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 54(2):290-300. [doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2007.243]