Show me the Money: The impact of actual rewards and losses on the feedback negativity

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 134-139

  Weinberg, Anna ^a   Riesel, Anja ^b   Proudfit, Greg Hajcak ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Feedback negativity; Monetary incentives; Reward processing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; GAMBLING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MONEY; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; REWARD; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; PHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REWARD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84898920565     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.03.015     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Baker T., Holroyd C. Dissociated roles of the anterior cingulate cortex in reward and conflict processing as revealed by the feedback error-related negativity and N200. Biological Psychology 2011, 87:25-34.
2. Becker M.P.I., Nitsch A.M., Miltner W.H.R., Straube T. A single-trial estimation of the feedback-related negativity and its relation to BOLD responses in a time-estimation task. The Journal of Neuroscience 2014, 34(8):3005-3012.
3. Bernat, E., Nelson, L., & Baskin-Sommers, A. (Submitted for publication). Time-frequency theta and delta measures index separable components of feedback processing in a gambling task.
4. Bernat E., Nelson L., Steele V., Gehring W., Patrick C. Externalizing psychopathology and gain-loss feedback in a simulated gambling task: Dissociable components of brain response revealed by time-frequency analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2011, 120(2):352.
5. Bismark A.W., Hajcak G., Whitworth N.M., Allen J.J.B. The role of outcome expectations in the generation of the feedback-related negativity. Psychophysiology 2012, 50(2):125-133.
6. Bogdan R., Santesso D., Fagerness J., Perlis R., Pizzagalli D. Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Type 1 (CRHR1) genetic variation and stress interact to influence reward learning. The Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(37):13246-13254.
7. Carlson J., Foti D., Harmon-Jones E., Mujica-Parodi L., Hajcak G. The neural processing of rewards in the human striatum: Correlation of fMRI and event-related potentials. Neuroimage 2011, 57:1608-1616. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.037.
8. Cattell R.B. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1966, 1:245-276.
9. Delgado M. Reward-related responses in the human striatum. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2007, 1104:70-88. 10.1196/annals.1390.002.
10. Dien J. The ERP PCA Toolkit: An open source program for advanced statistical analysis of event-related potential data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2010, 187:138-145.
11. Dien J. Evaluating two-step PCA of ERP data with Geomin, Infomax, Oblimin, Promax, and Varimax rotations. Psychophysiology 2010, 47(1):170-183. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00885.x.
12. Dien J., Beal D.J., Berg P. Optimizing principal components analysis of event-related potentials: Matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotations. Clinical Neurophysiology 2005, 116(8):1808-1825. 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.11.025.
13. Dien J., Frishkoff G. Principal components analysis of event-related potential datasets. Event-related potentials: A methods handbook 2005, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. T.C. Handy (Ed.).
14. Dien J., Khoe W., Mangun G.R. Evaluation of PCA and ICA of simulated ERPs: Promax vs. Infomax rotations. Human Brain Mapping 2007, 28(8):742-763. 10.1002/hbm.20304.
15. Foti D., Hajcak G. Depression and reduced sensitivity to non-rewards versus rewards: Evidence from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology 2009, 81(1):1-8. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.12.004.
16. Foti D., Hajcak G. Genetic variation in dopamine moderates neural response during reward anticipation and delivery: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 2012, 49(5):617-626.
17. Foti D., Weinberg A., Dien J., Hajcak G. Event-related potential activity in the basal ganglia differentiates rewards from non-rewards: Temporospatial principal components analysis and source localization of the feedback negativity. Human Brain Mapping 2011, 32(12):2207-2216. 10.1002/hbm.21182.
18. Gehring W., Willoughby A. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science 2002, 295(5563):2279-2282. 10.1126/science.1066893.
19. Gehring W., Willoughby A. Are all medial frontal negativities created equal? Toward a richer empirical basis for theories of action monitoring. Errors, conflicts, and the brain. Current Opinions on Performance Monitoring 2004, 14-20.
20. Gratton G., Coles M.G., Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1983, 55(4):468-484.
21. Hajcak G., Moser J.S., Holroyd C.B., Simons R.F. The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biological Psychology 2006, 71(2):148-154. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.04.001.
22. Harper, J., Olson, L., Nelson, L., & Bernat, E. (2011). Delta-band reward processing occurring during the Feedback-Related Negativity (FRN). In Poster presented at annual meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Boston, MA.
23. Hewig J., Kretschmer N., Trippe R., Hecht H., Coles M., Holroyd C., et al. Hypersensitivity to reward in problem gamblers. Biological Psychiatry 2010, 67(8):781-783.
24. Holroyd C., Coles M. The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review 2002, 109(4):679-709. 10.1037//0033-295X.109.4.67.
25. Holroyd C., Krigolson O., Lee S. Reward positivity elicited by predictive cues. NeuroReport 2011, 22(5):249.
26. Holroyd C., Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., Cohen J. Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event-related brain potential. NeuroReport 2003, 14(18):2481-2484. doi:10.10 97/01.wnr.0000099601.41403.a.
27. Holroyd C., Pakzad-Vaezi K., Krigolson O. The feedback correct-related positivity: Sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback. Psychophysiology 2008, 45(5):688-697. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00668.x.
28. Horn J.L. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 1965, 30:179-185.
29. Krigolson O., Hassall C., Balcom L., Turk D. Perceived ownership impacts reward evaluation within medial-frontal cortex. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 2013.
30. Liu W., Wang L., Shang H., Shen Y., Li Z., Cheung E.F.C., Chan R.C.K. The influence of anhedonia on feedback negativity in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychologia 2014, 53:213-220.
31. Martin L., Potts G., Burton P., Montague P. Electrophysiological and hemodynamic responses to reward prediction violation. NeuroReport 2009, 20(13):1140. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832f0dc.
32. Masaki H., Shibahara Y., Ogawa K., Yamazaki K., Hackley S. Action-outcome contingency and feedback-related negativity. Psychophysiology 2010, Suppl. 1:S100.
33. Miltner W., Braun C., Coles M. Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: Evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997, 9(6):788-798. 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.788.
34. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., Holroyd C.B., Schurger A., Cohen J.D. Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback. Cerebral Cortex 2004, 14(7):741-747.
35. Potts G., Martin L., Burton P., Montague P. When things are better or worse than expected: The medial frontal cortex and the allocation of processing resources. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18(7):1112-1119.
36. Ridderinkhof K.R., Ullsperger M., Crone E.A., Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 2004, 306(5695):443-447.
37. Sato A., Yasuda A., Ohira H., Miyawaki K., Nishikawa M., Kumano H., et al. Effects of value and reward magnitude on feedback negativity and P300. NeuroReport 2005, 16(4):407-411.
38. Schultz W. Getting formal with dopamine and reward. Neuron 2002, 36(2):241-263. 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00967-4.
39. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect-theory - Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1992, 5(4):297-323. 10.1007/BF00122574.
40. Van den Berg I., Shaul L., Van der Veen F.M., Franken I.H.A. The role of monetary incentives in feedback processing: Why we should pay our participants. NeuroReport 2012, 23(6):347.
41. Weinberg A., Luhmann C., Bress J., Hajcak G. Better late than never? The effect of feedback delay on neural indices of reward processing. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 2012, 12(4):671-677.
42. Yeung N., Holroyd C., Cohen J. ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(5):535-544. 10.1093/cercor/bhh153.
43. Yeung N., Sanfey A. Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain. The Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24(28):6258-6264. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4537-03.2004.