The trouble with informed consent

Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition

Volumn 99, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Wallenstein, Matthew B ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LETTER; MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD;

INFANTS; INFORMED CONSENT;

CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; HUMANS; OXYGEN; PATIENT SAFETY; PULMONARY SURFACTANTS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84898888586     PISSN: 13592998     EISSN: 14682052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305621     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Lantos JD. Learning the right lessons from the SUPPORT study controversy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2014;99:F4-F5.
2. SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Target ranges of oxygen saturation in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1959-69.
3. Reignier J, Mercier E, Le Gouge A, et al. Effect of not monitoring residual gastric volume on risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults receiving mechanical ventilation and early enteral feeding: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2013;309:249-56.
4. O'Herrin JK, Kudsk K, Frost N. Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations: effect on medical record research. Ann Surg 2004;239:772-6.