A Historical Review of Common Bone Graft Materials in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Foot and Ankle Specialist

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 143-151

  Arner, Justin W ^a   Santrock, Robert D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

arthritis and joint disease; bone healing orthobiologics; external and internal fixation; foot surgery techniques; new technology assessment

Indexed keywords

PLATELET DERIVED GROWTH FACTOR;

ALLOGRAFT; ANKLE; ARTHRITIS AND JOINT DISEASE; BONE HEALING/ORTHOBIOLOGICS; BONE MATRIX; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CERAMICS; EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL FIXATION; FOOT; FOOT SURGERY TECHNIQUES; HUMAN; ILIAC BONE; NEW TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; ORGAN DONOR; REVIEW; TRANSPLANTATION;

ARTHRITIS AND JOINT DISEASE; BONE HEALING/ORTHOBIOLOGICS; EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL FIXATION; FOOT SURGERY TECHNIQUES; NEW TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT;

ALLOGRAFTS; ANKLE; BONE MATRIX; BONE SUBSTITUTES; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CERAMICS; FOOT; HUMANS; ILIUM; PLATELET-DERIVED GROWTH FACTOR; TRANSPLANT DONOR SITE;

EID: 84898880562     PISSN: 19386400     EISSN: 19387636     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1938640013516358     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Flamme CH,Wulker N,Muller A,Wirth CJ.Long-term follow-up after arthrodesis of the ankle and hindfoot.Foot Ankle Surg. 1997;3:21-28.
2. Thordarson DB,Kuehn S.Use of demineralized bone matrix in ankle/hindfoot fusion.Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:557-560.
3. Nihal A,Gellman RE,Embil JM,Trepman E.Ankle arthrodesis.Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;14:1-10.
4. Fitzgibbons TC,Hawks MA,McMullen ST,Inda DJ.Bone grafting in surgery about the foot and ankle: indications and techniques.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19:112-120.
5. Kopp FJ,Banks MA,Marcus RE.Clinical outcome of tibiotalar arthrodesis utilizing the Chevron technique.Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:225-230.
6. Thompson IM,Bohay DR,Anderson JG.Fusion rate of first tarsometatarsal arthrodesis in the modified Lapidus procedure and flatfoot reconstruction.Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:698-703.
7. Geideman W,Early JS,Brodsky J.Clinical results of harvesting autogenous cancellous graft from the ipsilateral proximal tibia for use in foot and ankle surgery.Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:451-455.
8. Soohoo NF,Cracchiolo A.The results of utilizing proximal tibial bone graft in reconstructive procedures of the foot and ankle.Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;14:62-66.
9. O'Malley DF,Conti SF.Results of distal tibial bone grafting in hindfoot arthrodeses.Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17:374-377.
10. Danziger MB,Abdo RV,Decker JE.Distal tibia bone graft for arthrodesis of the foot and ankle.Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16:187-190.
11. Chou LB,Mann RA,Coughlin MJ,McPeake WT,Mizel MS.Stress fracture as a complication of autogenous bone graft harvest from the distal tibia.Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:199-201.
12. Raikin SM,Brislin K.Local bone graft harvested from the distal tibia or calcaneus for surgery of the foot and ankle.Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:449-453.
13. Biddinger KR,Komenda GA,Schon LC,Myerson MS.A new modified technique for harvest of calcaneal bone grafts in surgery on the foot and ankle.Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19:322-326.
14. Hayes WR,Smith RW.Trochanteric bone grafts in foot and ankle surgery.Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17:402-405.
15. Davies MB,Rosenfeld PF,Stavrou P,Saxby TS.A comprehensive review of subtalar arthrodesis.Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:295-297.
16. Younger EM,Chapman MW.Morbidity at bone graft donor sites.J Orthop Trauma. 1989;3:192-195.
17. Hill NM,Horne JG,Devane PA.Donor site morbidity in the iliac crest bone graft.Aust N Z J Surg. 1999;69:726-728.
18. Sammarco VJ,Chang L.Modern issues in bone graft substitutes and advances in bone tissue technology.Foot Ankle Clin. 2002;7:19-41.
19. Burchardt H.The biology of bone graft repair.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; (174): 28-42.
20. Pelker RR,Friedlaender GE,Markham TC.Biomechanical properties of bone allografts.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; (174): 54-57.
21. Thorén K,Aspenberg P.Ethylene oxide sterilization impairs allograft incorporation in a conduction chamber.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (318): 259-264.
22. Myerson MS,Neufeld SK,Uribe J.Fresh-frozen structural allografts in the foot and ankle.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:113-120.
23. Hollawell SM.Allograft cellular bone matrix as an alternative to autograft in hindfoot and ankle fusion procedures.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51:222-225.
24. Boyce T,Edwards J,Scarborough N.Allograft bone: the influence of processing on safety and performance.Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30:571-581.
25. Neufeld SK,Uribe J,Myerson MS.Use of structural allograft to compensate for bone loss in arthrodesis of the foot and ankle.Foot Ankle Clin. 2002;7:1-17.
26. Aaron AD.Ankle fusion: a retrospective review.Orthopedics. 1990;13:1249-1254.
27. Elsinger EC,Leal L.Coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes.J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996;35:396-399.
28. Cornell CN,Lane JM,Chapman M,et alMulticenter trial of Collagraft as bone graft substitute.J Orthop Trauma. 1991;5:1-8.
29. Bucholz RW,Carlton A,Holmes R.Interporous hydroxyapatite as a bone graft substitute in tibial plateau fractures.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; (240): 53-62.
30. Ijiri S,Yamamuro T,Nakamura T,Kotani S,Notoya K.Effect of sterilization on bone morphogenetic protein.J Orthop Res. 1994;12:628-636.
31. Russell JL,Block JE.Clinical utility of demineralized bone matrix for osseous defects, arthrodesis, and reconstruction: impact of processing techniques and study methodology.Orthopedics. 1999;22:524-531.
32. Michelson JD,Curl LA.Use of demineralized bone matrix in hindfoot arthrodesis.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (325): 203-208.
33. Alper G,Bernick S,Yazdi M,Nimni ME.Osteogenesis in bone defects in rats: the effects of hydroxyapatite and demineralized bone matrix.Am J Med Sci. 1989;298:371-376.
34. Bolander ME,Balian G.The use of demineralized bone matrix in the repair of segmental defects: augmentation with extracted matrix proteins and a comparison with autologous grafts.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:1264-1274.
35. Thordarson DB,Kuehn S.Use of demineralized bone matrix in ankle/hindfoot fusion.Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:557-560.
36. Collman DR,Kaas MH,Schuberth JM.Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: factors influencing union in 39 consecutive patients.Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:1079-1085.
37. Crosby LA,Yee TC,Formanek TS,Fitzgibbons TC.Complications following arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis.Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17:340-342.
38. Digiovanni CW,Baumhauer J,Lin SS,et alProspective, randomized, multi-center feasibility trial of rhPDGF-BB versus autologous bone graft in a foot and ankle fusion model.Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:344-354.
39. Daniels T,DiGiovanni C,Lau JT,Wing K,Younger A.Prospective clinical pilot trial in a single cohort group of rhPDGF in foot arthrodeses.Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:473-479.
40. Easley ME,Trnka HJ,Schon LC,Myerson MS.Isolated subtalar arthrodesis.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:613-624.