Virtual autopsy with multiphase postmortem computed tomographic angiography versus traditional medical autopsy to investigate unexpected deaths of hospitalized patients: A cohort study

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 160, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 534-541

  Wichmann, Dominic ^a   Heinemann, Axel ^a   Weinberg, Clemens ^a   Vogel, Hermann ^a   Hoepker, Wilhelm Wolfgang ^a   Grabherr, Silke ^b   Pueschel, Klaus ^a   Kluge, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY CENTER OF LEGAL MEDICINE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; EMERGENCY CARE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL AUTOPSY; MULTIPHASE POSTMORTEM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESUSCITATION; SUDDEN DEATH; VIRTUAL AUTOPSY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY; AUTOPSY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CAUSE OF DEATH; DEATH, SUDDEN; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84898878133     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/M13-2211     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cabot RC. Diagnostic pitfalls identified during a study of three thousand autopsies. JAMA. 1912;59:2295-8.
2. O'Grady G. Death of the teaching autopsy. BMJ. 2003;327:802-3. [PMID: 14525883]
3. Tejerina E, Esteban A, Fernández-Segoviano P, María Rodríguez-Barbero J, Gordo F, Frutos-Vivar F, et al. Clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:842-6. [PMID: 22001588]
4. Wichmann D, Obbelode F, Vogel H, Hoepker WW, Nierhaus A, Braune S, et al. Virtual autopsy as an alternative to traditional medical autopsy in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:123-30. [PMID: 22250143]
5. Combes A, Mokhtari M, Couvelard A, Trouillet JL, Baudot J, Hénin D, et al. Clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:389-92. [PMID: 14980989]
6. Esteban A, Fernández-Segoviano P. The autopsy as a tool to monitor diagnostic error [Editorial]. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:343-4. [PMID: 10342503]
7. Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003;289:2849-56. [PMID: 12783916]
8. Veress B, Alafuzoff I. Clinical diagnostic accuracy audited by autopsy in a university hospital in two eras. Qual Assur Health Care. 1993;5:281-6. [PMID: 8018882]
9. Roberts WC. The autopsy: its decline and a suggestion for its revival. N Engl J Med. 1978;299:332-8. [PMID: 683266]
10. Start RD, McCulloch TA, Benbow EW, Lauder I, Underwood JC. Clinical necropsy rates during the 1980s: the continued decline. J Pathol. 1993;171:63-6. [PMID: 8229459]
11. Bombí JA, Ramírez J, Solé M, Grau JM, Chabas E, Astudillo E, et al. Clinical and autopsy correlation evaluated in a university hospital in Spain (1991-2000). Pathol Res Pract. 2003;199:9-14. [PMID: 12650512]
12. Roberts IS, Benamore RE, Benbow EW, Lee SH, Harris JN, Jackson A, et al. Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. Lancet. 2012;379:136-42. [PMID: 22112684]
13. Winters B, Custer J, Galvagno SM Jr, Colantuoni E, Kapoor SG, Lee H, et al. Diagnostic errors in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of autopsy studies. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:894-902. [PMID: 22822241]
14. Chugh SS, Reinier K, Teodorescu C, Evanado A, Kehr E, Al Samara M, et al. Epidemiology of sudden cardiac death: clinical and research implications. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;51:213-28. [PMID: 19026856]
15. Minino AM, Murphy SL. Death in the United States, 2010. NCHS Data Brief. 2012:1-8. [PMID: 23050606]
16. Roberts IS, Benamore RE, Peebles C, Roobottom C, Traill ZC. Technical report: diagnosis of coronary artery disease using minimally invasive autopsy: evaluation of a novel method of post-mortem coronary CT angiography. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:645-50. [PMID: 21377145]
17. Saunders SL, Morgan B, Raj V, Robinson CE, Rutty GN. Targeted postmortem computed tomography cardiac angiography: proof of concept. Int J Legal Med. 2011;125:609-16. [PMID: 21347686]
18. Saunders SL, Morgan B, Raj V, Rutty GN. Post-mortem computed tomography angiography: past, present and future. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2011;7:271-7. [PMID: 21153718]
19. Ross SG, Thali MJ, Bolliger S, Germerott T, Ruder TD, Flach PM. Sudden death after chest pain: feasibility of virtual autopsy with postmortem CT angiography and biopsy. Radiology. 2012;264:250-9. [PMID: 22570504]
20. Grabherr S, Doenz F, Steger B, Dirnhofer R, Dominguez A, Sollberger B, et al. Multi-phase post-mortem CT angiography: development of a standardized protocol. Int J Legal Med. 2011;125:791-802. [PMID: 21057803]
21. Christine C, Francesco D, Paul V, Cristian P, Alejandro D, Stefano B, et al. Postmortem computed tomography angiography vs. conventional autopsy: advantages and inconveniences of each method. Int J Legal Med. 2013;127:981-9. [PMID: 23292183]
22. Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, Cohn LH, Bettmann M, Weisberg M. The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:1000-5. [PMID: 6835306]
23. Dimopoulos G, Piagnerelli M, Berré J, Salmon I, Vincent JL. Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful? Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:2080-5. [PMID: 15480565]
24. eulerAPE. Drawing Area-Proportional Euler and Venn Diagrams Using Ellipses. Version 3.0.0. Accessed at www.eulerdiagrams.org/eulerAPE/ on 27 December 2013.
25. Palmiere C, Binaghi S, Doenz F, Bize P, Chevallier C, Mangin P, et al. Detection of hemorrhage source: the diagnostic value of post-mortem CTangiography. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;222:33-9. [PMID: 22621794]
26. Jackowski C, Thali M, Sonnenschein M, Aghayev E, Yen K, Dirnhofer R, et al. Visualization and quantification of air embolism structure by processing postmortem MSCT data. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49:1339-42. [PMID: 15568710]
27. Michaud K, Grabherr S, Doenz F, Mangin P. Evaluation of postmortem MDCT and MDCT-angiography for the investigation of sudden cardiac death related to atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28:1807-22. [PMID: 22238022]
28. Saunders SL, Morgan B, Raj V, Rutty GN. Post-mortem computed tomography angiography: past, present and future. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2011;7:271-7. [PMID: 21153718]
29. Zerlauth JB, Doenz F, Dominguez A, Palmiere C, Uské A, Meuli R, et al. Surgical interventions with fatal outcome: utility of multi-phase postmortem CT angiography. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;225:32-41. [PMID: 22721937]
30. Roberts IS, Traill ZC. Minimally invasive autopsy employing post-mortem CT and targeted coronary angiography: evaluation of its application to a routine Coronial service. Histopathology. 2014;64:211-7. [PMID: 24164418]
31. Bruguier C, Mosimann PJ, Vaucher P, Uské A, Doenz F, Jackowski C, et al. Multi-phase postmortem CT angiography: recognizing technique-related artefacts and pitfalls. Int J Legal Med. 2013;127:639-52. [PMID: 23515679]
32. Aghayev E, Ebert LC, Christe A, Jackowski C, Rudolph T, Kowal J, et al. CT data-based navigation for post-mortem biopsy-A feasibility study. J Forensic Leg Med. 2008;15:382-7. [PMID: 18586209]
33. Weustink AC, Hunink MG, van Dijke CF, Renken NS, Krestin GP, Oosterhuis JW. Minimally invasive autopsy: an alternative to conventional autopsy? Radiology. 2009;250:897-904. [PMID: 19244053]