Which cut-off value of serum anti-Müllerian hormone level can predict poor ovarian reserve, poor ovarian response to stimulation and in vitro fertilization success? A prospective data analysis

Gynecological Endocrinology

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 372-376

  Ficicioglu, Cem ^a   Cenksoy, Pinar Ozcan ^a   Yildirim, Gazi ^a   Kaspar, Cigdem ^a  

^a YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

AMH; Assisted reproduction; in vitro fertilization; Ovarian reserve; Reproductive endocrinology

Indexed keywords

ESTRADIOL; FOLLITROPIN; GONADOTROPIN; MUELLERIAN INHIBITING FACTOR; PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR; RECOMBINANT CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; RECOMBINANT FOLLITROPIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ESTRADIOL BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FOLLITROPIN BLOOD LEVEL; HORMONE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OOCYTE; OOCYTE MATURATION; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; OVARIAN RESERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SINGLE DRUG DOSE; BLOOD; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OVULATION INDUCTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE; ESTRADIOL; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FOLLICLE STIMULATING HORMONE; HUMANS; OVARIAN RESERVE; OVULATION INDUCTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84898863152     PISSN: 09513590     EISSN: 14730766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2014.887064     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. te Velde ER, Pearson PL. The variability of female reproductive aging. Hum Reprod Update 2002;8:141-54
2. Chuang CC, Chen CD, Chao KH, et al. Age is a better predictor of pregnancy potential than basal FSH levels in women undergoing IVF. Fertil Steril 2003;79:63-8
3. Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, et al. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update 2006;12:685-718
4. Broer SL, Mol BWJ, Hendriks D, Broekmans FJM. The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count. Fertil Steril 2009;91: 705-14
5. Nardo LG, Gelbaya T, Wilkinson H, et al. Circulating basal antimullerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1586-93
6. Weenen C, Laven JS, Von Bergh AR, et al. Anti-mullerian hormone expression pattern in the human ovary: potential implications for initial and cyclic follicle recruitment. Mol Hum Reprod 2004;10: 77-83
7. Ebner T, Sommergruber M, Moser M, et al. Basal level of antimullerian hormone is associated with oocyte quality in stimulated cycles. Hum Reprod 2006;21:2022-6
8. Majumder K, Gelbaya TA, Laing I, Nardo LG. The use of anti- Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count to predict the potential of oocytes and embryos. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 150:166-70
9. Nelson SM, Yates RW, Lyall H, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormonebased approach to controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted conception. Hum Reprod 2009;24:867-75
10. Andersona RA, Nelson SM, Wallacec WHB. Measuring anti- Müllerian hormone for the assessment of ovarian reserve: when and for whom is it indicated? Maturitas 2012;71:28-33
11. Majumder K, Gelbaya TA, Laing I, et al. The use of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count to predict the potential of oocytes and embryos. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 150:166-70
12. Rustamov O, Smith A, Roberts SA, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone: poor assay reproducibility in a large cohort of subjects suggests sample instability. Hum Reprod 2012;27:3085-91
13. Long WQ, Ranchin V, Pautier P, et al. Detection of minimal levels of serum anti-Mullerian hormone during follow-up of patients with ovarian granulosa cell tumor by means of a highly sensitive enzymelinked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85: 540-4
14. La Marca A, Sighinolfi G, Radi D, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Hum Reprod Update 2010;16:113-30
15. La Marca A, Nelson SM, Sighinolfi G, et al. Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) based prediction model for the live birth in assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online 2011;22:341-9
16. Nelson SM. Biomarkers of ovarian response: current and future applications. Fertil Steril 2013;99:963-9
17. Fiçicioglu C, Kutlu T, Baglam E, Bakacak Z. Early follicular antimü llerian hormone as an indicator of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 2006;85:592-6
18. Broer SL, Mol BW, Hendriks D, Broekmans FJ. The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count. Fertil Steril 2009;91: 705-14
19. Broer SL, Dolleman M, Opmeer BC, et al. AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:46-54
20. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BCJM, et al. ESHRE consensus on the definition of ?poor response? to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2011;26: 1616-24.