A holistic review of applied methodologies for assessing and selecting the optimal technological alternative from a sustainability perspective

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 70, Issue , 2014, Pages 259-281

  Ibanez Fores V ^a   Bovea, M D ^a   Perez Belis V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cleaner technology; Industrial sustainability; Multi criteria decision making; Technology assessment

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS; INDUSTRY; OPTIMIZATION;

BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES; CLEANER TECHNOLOGIES; INDUSTRIAL SUSTAINABILITY; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES; SOURCES OF INFORMATIONS; TECHNOLOGICAL ALTERNATIVES; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84898853489     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.082     Document Type: Review

References (148)

1. N.H. Afgan, and M.G. Carvalho Sustainability assessment of hydrogen energy systems Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 29 2004 1327 1342
2. A. Afuah How much do your co-opetitors capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strat. Manag. J. 21 2000 387 404
3. S. Ahlroth, M. Nilsson, G. Finnveden, O. Hjelm, and E. Hochschorner Weighting and valuation in selected environmental systems analysis tools - suggestions for further developments J. Clean. Prod. 19 2011 145 156
4. A. Azapagic, and S. Perdan Indicators of sustainable development for industry: a general framework Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 78 4 2000 243 261
5. G. Azzone, and R. Manzini Quick and dirty technology assessment: the case of an Italian research centre Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 75 8 2008 1324 1338
6. M.L. Barry, H. Steyn, and A. Brent Determining the most important factors for sustainable energy technology selection in Africa: application of the focus group technique Proceedings of the 2008 Portland International Center for Management on Engineering and Technology 2008 181 187
7. M.L. Barry, H. Steyn, and A. Brent Selection of renewable energy technologies for Africa: eight case studies in Rwanda, Tanzania and Malawi Renew. Energy 36 11 2011 2845 2852
8. M.E. Baysal, A. Sarucan, C. Kahraman, and O. Engin The selection of renewable energy power plant technology using fuzzy data envelopment analysis Proceedings of the 2011 World Congress on Engineering 2011 1140 1143
9. M. Beccali, M. Cellura, and M. Mistretta Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology Renew. Energy 28 2003 2063 2087
10. F. Begić, and N.H. Afgan Sustainability assessment tool for the decision making in selection of energy system-Bosnian case Energy 32 2007 1979 1985
11. V. Belton, and T. Stewart Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. An Integrated Approach 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
12. T. Bhatti Justification of manufacturing technology capital investment: an integrated approach Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology (ICMIT 2000) 2000 346 353
13. D. Bollinger, and J. Pictet Multiple criteria decision analysis of treatment and land-filling technologies for waste incineration residues Int. J. Manag. Sci. 36 2008 418 428
14. E.J. Bonano, G.E. Apostolakis, P.F. Salter, A. Ghassemi, and S. Jennings Application of risk assessment and decision analysis to the evaluation, ranking and selection of environmental remediation alternatives J. Hazard. Mater. 71 1-3 2000 35 57
15. M. Bottero, E. Comino, and V. Riggio Application of the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems Environ. Model. Softw. 26 2011 1211 1224
16. M.D. Bovea, E. Díaz-Albo, A. Gallardo, F.J. Colomer, and J. Serrano Environmental performance of ceramic tiles: improvement proposals Mater. Des. 31 2010 35 41
17. J.P. Brans, and P. Vincke A preference ranking organization method: the PROMETHEE method for MCDM Manag. Sci. 31 6 1985 647 656
18. T. Bréchet, and H. Tulkens Beyond BAT: selecting optimal combinations of available techniques, with an example from the limestone industry J. Environ. Manag. 90 2009 1790 1801
19. L. Breedveld, G. Timellini, G. Casoni, A. Fregni, and G. Busani Eco-efficiency of fabric filters in the Italian ceramic tile industry J. Clean. Prod. 15 2007 86 93
20. D.V. Budescu Differential Weighting of Multiple Choice Items 1979 Educational Testing Service Princeton
21. J. Canton Top Ten Extreme Technology Trends 2008 http://www.globalfuturist.com/about-igf/top-ten-trends/top-tenextreme-technology-trends-for-2008.html (accessed 25.04.13.)
22. F. Cavallaro Multi-criteria decision aid to assess concentrated solar thermal technologies Renew. Energy 34 2009 1678 1685
23. K. Cengiz Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making: Theory and Applications with Recent Developments 2008 Springer
24. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes Measuring the efficiency of decision making units Eur. J. Operat. Res. 2 6 1978 429 444
25. S. Chowdhury, and T. Husain Evaluation of drinking water treatment technology: an entropy-based fuzzy application J. Environ. Eng. 132 2006 1264 1271
26. J.F. Coates Technology assessment: a tool kit Chemtech 6 1976 372 383
27. J. Cristóbal, G. Guillén-Gosálbez, L. Jiménez, and A. Irabien Optimization of global and local pollution control in electricity production from coal burning Appl. Energy 92 2012 369 378
28. A. Critto, L. Cantarella, C. Carlon, S. Giove, G. Petruzzelli, and A. Marcomini Decision support-oriented selection of remediation technologies to rehabilitate contaminated sites Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2 3 2006 273 285
29. K. Cziner, M. Tuomaala, and M. Hurme Multicriteria decision making in process integration J. Clean. Prod. 13 5 2005 475 483
30. T. Daim, and N. Intarode A framework for technology assessment: case of a Thai building material manufacturer Energy Sustain. Dev. 13 2009 280 286
31. W.J. De Lange, W.H.L. Stafford, G.G. Forsyth, and D.C. Le Maitre Incorporating stakeholder preferences in the selection of technologies for using invasive alien plants as a bio-energy feedstock: applying the analytical hierarchy process J. Environ. Manag. 99 2012 76 83
32. A. De Piante Henriksen A technology assessment primer for management of technology Int. J. Technol. Manag. 13 5/6 1997 615 638
33. J.L. Deng Introduction to grey system theory J. Grey Syst. 1 1989 1 24
34. A. Derden, P. Vercaemst, and R. Dijkmans Best available techniques (BAT) for the fruit and vegetable processing industry Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 34 2002 261 271
35. R. Dijkmans Methodology for selection of best available techniques (BAT) at the sector level J. Clean. Prod. 8 1 2000 11 21
36. Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 24 November on industrial emissions. Official Journal of the European Union, L 334/17.
37. Directive 96/61/EC of the Council of the European Union of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control. Official Journal L 257. P. 0026-0040.
38. H. Doukas, K.D. Patlitzianas, and J. Psarras Supporting sustainable electricity technologies in Greece using MCDM Resour. Policy 31 2006 129 136
39. EC ExternE P. Bickel, R. Friedrich, Externalities of Energy, Methodology 2005 Update 2005
40. EC Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, Reference Document on Economics and Cross-Media Effects 2006
41. W. Edwards How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. 7 5 1977 326 340
42. J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. State of the Art Survey 2005 Springer New York
43. T. Fijal An environmental assessment method for cleaner production technologies J. Clean. Prod. 15 2007 914 919
44. P.C. Fishburn Utility Theory for Decision-making 1970 John Wiley New York
45. M. Freudenberg Composite Indicators of Country Performance: a Critical Assessment OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2003/16 2003 Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico (OECD) París
46. N. García, and J.A. Caballero Economic and environmental assessment of alternatives to the extraction of acetic acid from water Indus. Eng. Chem. Res. 50 2011 10717 10729
47. C. Gaudreault, R. Samson, and P. Stuart Implications of choices and interpretation in LCA for multi-criteria process design: de-inked pulp capacity and cogeneration at a paper mill case study J. Clean. Prod. 17 17 2009 1535 1546
48. M. Gelderman The relation between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance Inform. Manag. 34 1 1998 11 18
49. J. Geldermann, and O. Rentz Integrated technique assessment with imprecise information as a support for the determination of best available techniques (BAT) Spektrum 23 2001 137 157
50. J. Geldermann, and O. Rentz The reference installation approach for the techno-economic assessment of emission abatement options and the determination of BAT according to the IPPC Directive J. Clean. Prod. 12 2004 389 402
51. D.A. Georgakellos Environmental assessment of technology investments using the LCA polygon framework Trans. Ecol. Environ. 98 2006 119 128
52. E. Georgopoulou, V. Hontou, N. Gakis, Y. Sarafidis, S. Mirasgedis, D.P. Lalas, A. Loukatos, N. Gargoulas, A. Mentzis, D. Economidis, T. Triantafilopoulos, and K. Korizi BEAsT: a decision-support tool for assessing the environmental benefits and the economic attractiveness of best available techniques in industry J. Clean. Prod. 16 2008 359 373
53. G. Giner-Santonja, P. Aragonés-Beltrán, and J. Niclós-Ferragut The application of the analytic network process to the assessment of best available techniques J. Clean. Prod. 25 2012 86 95
54. M. Goedkoop, and R. Spriensma The Ecoindicator'99: a Damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment: Methodology Report 2000 Pré Consultants BV Amersfoort: The Netherlands
55. M.D. Gómez-López, J. Bayo, M.S. García-Cascales, and J.M. Angosto Decision support in disinfection technologies for treated wastewater reuse J. Clean. Prod. 17 2009 1504 1511
56. L. Grandinetti, F. Guerriero, G. Lepera, and M. Mancini A niched genetic algorithm to solve a pollutant emission reduction problem in the manufacturing industry: a case study Comput. Operat. Res. 34 7 2007 2191 2214
57. G. Guidi, F. Gugliermetti, and A.C. Violante Proposed criteria to select best available techniques (BATs) for oil spill response 9th International Conference on Chemical and Process Engineering 2009
58. J.B. Guinée, G. Huppes, and R. Heijungs Developing an LCA guide for decision support Environ. Manag. Health 12 2001 301 311
59. H.C. Guo, B. Chen, X.L. Yu, G.H. Huang, L. Liu, and X.H. Nie Assessment of cleaner production options for alcohol industry of China: a study in the Shouguang alcohol factory J. Clean. Prod. 14 1 2006 94 103
60. S. Hajkowicz, and K. Collins A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management Water Resour. Manag. 21 2007 1553 1566
61. A. Halog, F. Shultmann, and O. Rentz Using quality function deployment for technique selection for optimum environmental performance improvement J. Clean. Prod. 9 2001 387 394
62. M. Herva, and E. Roca Review of combined approaches and multi-criteria analysis for corporate environmental evaluation J. Clean. Prod. 39 2012 355 371
63. N.V. Hovanov Analiz i sintez pokazatelej pri informazionnom defizite 1996 St Petersburg State University
64. I.B. Huang, J. Keisler, and I. Linkov Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends Sci. Total Environ. 409 2011 3578 3594
65. D.N. Huntzinger, and T.D. Eatmon A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies J. Clean. Prod. 17 7 2009 668 675
66. G. Huppes Why we need better eco-efficiency analysis: from technological optimism to realism Tech. Theor. Prax. 3 2007 16
67. D. Huybrechts, E. Meynaerts, and K. Vrancken SOx emission reduction in the ceramic industry: BAT and beyond Trans. Ecol. Environ. 101 2007 191 200
68. C.L. Hwang, and K. Yoon Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications 1981 Springer-Verlag Berlin
69. V. Ibáñez-Forés, M.D. Bovea, and A. Azapagic Assessing the sustainability of best available techniques (BAT): methodology and application in the ceramic tiles industry J. Clean. Prod. 51 2013 162 176
70. 2 emission J. Hazard. Mater. 192 2011 1234 1242
71. ISO 14040 Environmental Management. Life Cycle Assessment. Principles and Framework 2006 ISO Geneva
72. ISO 14044 Environmental Management. Life Cycle Assessment. Requirements and Guidelines 2006 ISO Geneva
73. ISO/TR 14048 Environmental Management. Life Cycle Assessment. Data Documentation Format 2002 ISO Geneva
74. R. Jacobs, P. Smith, and M. Goddard Measuring Performance: an Examination of Composite Performance Indicators CHE Technical Paper Series 29 2004 Centre for Health Economics - University of York York (UK)
75. A. Karagiannidis, and G. Perkoulidis A multi-criteria ranking of different technologies for the anaerobic digestion for energy recovery of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes Bioresour. Technol. 100 2009 2355 2360
76. A. Karavanas, A. Chaloulakou, and N. Spyrellis Evaluation of the implementation of best available techniques in IPPC context: an environmental performance indicators approach J. Clean. Prod. 17 2009 480 486
77. A. Kazagić, I. Smajević, and N. Duić Selection of sustainable technologies for combustion of Bosnian coals Therm. Sci. 14 3 2010 715 727
78. R. Keeney, and H. Raiffa Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs 1976 John Wiley New York
79. O. Khelifi, F. Dalla Giovanna, S. Vranes, A. Lodolo, and S. Miertus Decision support tool for used oil regeneration technologies assessment and selection J. Hazard. Mater. 137 2006 437 442
80. W. Kloepffer Life cycle sustainability assessment of products Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13 2 2008 89 94
81. D. Kocaoglu, K. Williamson, A. Saberiyan, and L. Olive Technology selection in Brownfields redevelopment Portland Int. Conf. Manag. Eng. Technol. 2 2001 87 93
82. D. Krajnc, M. Mele, and P. Glavič Fuzzy logic model for the performance benchmarking of sugar plants by considering best available techniques Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 52 2007 314 330
83. R. Lahdelma, P. Salminen, and J. Hokkanen Using multicriteria methods in environmental planning and management Environ. Manag. 26 2000 595 605
84. S.K. Lee, G. Mogi, S.C. Shin, and J.W. Kim Measuring the relative efficiency of greenhouse gas technologies: an AHP/DEA hybrid model approach Proceedings of the International MultiConference on Engineers and Computer Scientists vol. 2 2008 19 21
85. X. Li, H. Xu, Y. Gao, and Y. Tao Comparison of end-of-life tire treatment technologies: a Chinese case study Waste Manag. 30 11 2010 2235 2246
86. Z. Liao, and M.T. Cheung Internet-based e-banking and consumer attitudes: an empirical study Inform. Manag. 39 2002 283 295
87. G.T.R. Lin, and Y.C. Shen A collaborative model for technology evaluation and decision-making J. Sci. Indus. Res. 69 2010 94 100
88. H.A. Linstone, and M. Turoff The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications 1975 Adison-Wesley Reading, Mass
89. X. Liu, and Z. Wen Best available techniques and pollution control: a case study on China's thermal power industry J. Clean. Prod. 23 2012 113 121
90. G. Lohse, K. Biolsi, N. Walker, and H. Rueter A classification of visual representations Commun. ACM 37 12 1994 36 49
91. M. Lupión, F.J. Gutiérrez Ortiz, B. Navarrete, and V.J. Cortés Assessment performance of high-temperature filtering elements Fuel 89 4 2010 848 854
92. G. Mavrotas, E. Georgopoulou, S. Mirasgedis, Y. Sarafidis, D. Lalas, V. Hontou, and N. Gakis An integrated approach for the selection of best available techniques (BAT) for the industries in the greater Athens area using multi-objective combinatorial optimization Energy Econ. 29 2007 953 973
93. E. Monfort, V. Sanfelix, I. Celades, S. Gomar, F. Martín, B. Aceña, and A. Pascual Diffuse PM10 emission factors associated with dust abatement technologies in the ceramic industry Atmosph. Environ. 45 39 2011 7286 7292
94. 2 emissions in the EU27 cement industry and the relationship with the capital budgeting decision criteria J. Clean. Prod. 19 2011 1207 1215
95. H.E. Muga, and J.R. Mihelcic Sustainability of wastewater treatment technologies J. Environ. Manag. 88 3 2008 437 447
96. J.K. Musango, and A.C. Brent A conceptual framework for energy technology sustainability assessment Energy Sustain. Dev. 15 1 2011 84 91
97. M. Nardo, M. Saisana, A. Saltelli, and S. Tarantola Tools for Composite Indicators Building 2005 Joint Research Centre - European Commission Ispra, Italy
98. M.J. Nicholas, R. Clift, A. Azapagic, F.C. Walker, and D.E. Porter Determination of best available techniques for integrated pollution prevention and control: a life cycle approach Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 78 3 2000 193 203
99. E. Nieminen, M. Linke, M. Tobler, and B.V. Beke EU COST action 628: life cycle assessment (LCA) of textile products, eco-efficiency and definition of best available technology (BAT) of textile processing J. Clean. Prod. 15 13-14 2007 1259 1270
100. D.W. Pearce, and A. Markandya Environmental Policy Benefits: Monetary Valuation 1989 OECD Paris
101. P.A. Pilavachi, C.P. Roumpeas, S. Minett, and N.H. Afgan Multi-criteria evaluation for CHP system options Energy Convers. Manag. 47 2006 3519 3529
102. P.A. Pilavachi, S.D. Stephanidis, V.A. Pappas, and N.H. Afgan Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen and natural gas fuelled power plant technologies Appl. Therm. Eng. 29 2009 2228 2234
103. S.D. Pohekar, and M. Ramachandran Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning: a review Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 8 4 2004 365 381
104. T.R. Prabhu, and K. Vizayakumar Technology choice using FHDM: a case of iron-making technology IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 48 2 2001 209 222
105. W. Ridder Sustainability A-test Project: Deliverable 3 Draft Methodology Report 2004 Institute for Environmental Studies Amsterdam, The Netherlands
106. C. Rinaldi, A. Fregni, C. Palmonari, and G. Timellini Methodology for life cycle assessment of ceramic floor and wall tiles: applications in BAT definition for ceramic tiles industry Key Eng. Mater. 206-213 2002 829 834
107. M.T. Rodríguez, L.C. Andrade, P.M.B. Bugallo, and J.J.C. Long Combining LCT tools for the optimization of an industrial process: material and energy flow analysis and best available techniques J. Hazard. Mater. 192 3 2011 1705 1719
108. B. Roy Classement et choix en présence de critères multiples (la méthode ELECTRE) RIRO 8 1968 57 75
109. T.L. Saaty The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980 McGraw Hill New York
110. T.L. Saaty The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation 1996 RWS Publications Pittsburgh
111. R. Sadiq, F.I. Khan, and B. Veitch Evaluating offshore technologies for produced water management using GreenPro-I: a risk-based life cycle analysis for green and clean process selection and design Comput. Chem. Eng. 29 5 2005 1023 1039
112. W. Sadok, F. Angevin, J.-E. Bergez, C. Bockstaller, B. Colomb, L. Guichard, R. Reau, and T. Doré Ex ante assessment of the sustainability of alternative cropping systems: implications for using multi-criteria decision-aid methods: a review Agron. Sustain. Dev. 28 2008 163 174
113. M. Saisana, and S. Tarantola State-of-the-art Report on Current Methodologies and Practices for Composite Indicator Development 2002 European Commission - JRC Italy http://farmweb.jrc.cec.eu.int/ci/articles-books.htm
114. S.M.K. Samarakoon, and O.T. Gudmestad The IPPC directive and technique qualification at offshore oil and gas installations J. Clean. Prod. 19 2011 13 20
115. J. Samuels, M. Wilkes, and R. Brayshaw Financial Management and Decision Making 1999 International Thomson Business Press London
116. J.R. San Cristóbal A multi criteria data envelopment analysis model to evaluate the efficiency of the renewable energy technologies Renew. Energy 36 10 2011 2742 2746
117. G. Sánchez Análisis de la sostenibilidad agraria mediante indicadores sintéticos: aplicación empírica para sistemas agrarios de Castilla y León Tesis Doctoral 2009 Departamento de economía y ciencias sociales agrarias. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, España
118. A. Sarucan, M.E. Baysal, C. Kahraman, and O. Engin A hierarchy grey relational analysis for selecting the renewable electricity generation technologies Proceedings of the 2011 World Congress on Engineering vol. 2 2011 1149 1154
119. H. Schoenberger Lignite coke moving bed adsorber for cement plants e BAT or beyond BAT? J. Clean. Prod. 19 2011 1057 1065
120. H. Schollenberger, M. Treitz, and J. Geldermann Adapting the European approach of best available techniques: case studies from Chile and China J. Clean. Prod. 16 17 2008 1856 1864
121. F. Schultmann, R. Jochum, and O. Rentz A methodological approach for the economic assessment of best available techniques LCA Methodol. 6 1 2001 19 27
122. L.M. Seiford, and R.M. Thrall Recent developments in DEA: the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis J. Econ. 46 1990 7 38
123. N. Shehabuddeen, D. Probert, and R. Phaal From theory to practice: challenges in operationalising a technology selection framework Technovation 26 3 2006 324 335
124. Y.S. Sherif, and W.J. Kolarik Life cycle costing: concept and practice Omega 9 3 1981 287 296
125. I. Silvestravičiute, and I. Karaliunaite Comparison of end-of-life tyre treatment technologies: life cycle inventory analysis Environ. Res. Eng. Manag. 1 35 2006 52 60
126. R.E.H.M. Smith State of the art technology assessment in Europe Proc. 2nd European Congress on Technology Assessment, Milan, Italy 1990
127. W.E. Souder, and D. Bethay The risk pyramid for new product development J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 10 1993 181 194
128. R. Steuer Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application 1986 John Wiley New York
129. D. Streimikiene, T. Balezentis, I. Krisciukaitien, and A. Balezentis Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16 5 2012 3302 3311
130. X. Sun, and Y. Li An intelligent multi-criteria decision support system for systems design Proceedings of the 13th Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization and 10th Aviation Technology Integration and Operations Conference 2010
131. N. Tangsubkul, P. Beavis, S.J. Moore, S. Lundie, and T.D. Waite Life cycle assessment of water recycling technology Water Resour. Manag. 19 2005 521 537
132. T.A. Tran, and T. Daim A taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 75 2008 1396 1405
133. UNE 150008 Análisis y Evaluación del Riesgo Ambiental 2008 AENOR
134. C. Valderrama, R. Granados, J.L. Cortina, C.M. Gasol, M. Guillem, and A. Josa Implementation of best available techniques in cement manufacturing: a life-cycle assessment study J. Clean. Prod. 25 2012 60 67
135. K.F. Van der Woerd, R.B. Dellink, J.J.M. Boelens, and I.A.W. En van Rijn Handleiding MIOW+ 1996 Instituut voor Milieuvraagstukken en Economicsh en Sociaal Instituut Amsterdam
136. K.F. Van der Woerd, I.A.W. van Rijn, S. Rosdorff, E. Masurel, Y.M. van Everdingen, and R.B. Dellinck MIOW+ Achtergrond bij het Model 1996 Instituut voor Milieuvraagstukken en Economicsh en Sociaal Instituut Amsterdam
137. R.P. Vignes Use limited life-cycle analysis for environmental decision-making Chem. Eng. Prog. 97 2 2001 40 54
138. F.A. Vollenbroek Sustainable development and the challenge of innovation J. Clean. Prod. 10 2002 215 223
139. D. Von Winterfeldt, and W. Edwards Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research 1986 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, England
140. J.-J. Wang, Y.-Y. Jing, C.-F. Zhang, G.H. Shi, and X.-T. Zhang A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system Energy Policy 36 10 2008 3823 3832
141. J.J. Wang, Y.Y. Jing, C.F. Zhang, and J.H. Zhao Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13 9 2009 2263 2278
142. E.F. Wolstenholme The use of system dynamics as a tool for intermediate level technologies: three case studies J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 20 2003 193 204
143. E. Worrel, and C. Galitsky Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for Cement Making Report n°54036. Revision 2008 An ENERGYSTAR Guide for Energy and Plant Managers 2008 Lawrence BerkeleyNational Laboratory Berkeley, CA
144. Q.Z. Yang, B.H. Chua, and B. Song A matrix evaluation model for sustainability assessment of manufacturing technologies World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 56 2009 493 498
145. O.Y. Yu, S.D. Guikema, J.L. Briaud, and D. Burnett Sensitivity analysis for multi-attribute system selection problems in onshore environmentally friendly drilling (EFD) Syst. Eng. 15 2 2012 153 171
146. D.B. Zarkovic, Z.N. Todorovi, and L.V. Rajakovi Simple and cost-effective measures for the improvement of paper mill effluent treatment: a case study J. Clean. Prod. 19 2011 764 774
147. M. Zeleny Multiple Criteria Decision Making 1982 McGraw-Hill New York
148. G. Zeng, R. Jiang, G. Huang, M. Xu, and J. Li Optimization of wastewater treatment alternative selection by hierarchy grey relational analysis J. Environ. Manag. 82 2 2007 250 259