Training monitoring skills in helicopter pilots

Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 543-549

  Potter, Brian A ^a   Blickensderfer, Elizabeth L ^b   Boquet, Albert J ^b  

^a U S COAST GUARD   (United States)

^b EMBRY RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

e learning; Error management; Helicopter pilots; Monitoring skills

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AVIATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTINUING EDUCATION; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE;

ADULT; AVIATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION, CONTINUING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE;

EID: 84898837946     PISSN: 00956562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.3771.2014     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Dismukes RK. Prospective memory in aviation and everyday settings. In: Kliegel M, McDonald MA, Einstein GO, eds. Prospective memory: cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2007.
2. Dismukes RK, Berman BA. Checklists and monitoring in the cockpit: why crucial defenses sometimes fail. NASA Technical Memorandum. Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center; 2010. Report No.: (NASA TM-2010-216396).
3. Dismukes RK, Loukopoulos LD, Jobe K, Jensen RS. The challenges of managing concurrent and deferred tasks. In: Jensen RS, ed. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Dayton, OH: Wright State University; 2001.
4. Gladwell M. Outliers: the story of success. New York: Little, Brown and Company; 2008.
5. Helmreich RL, Klinect JR, Wilhelm JA. Models of threat, error, and CRM in flight operations. Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Dayton, OH: Wright State University; 1999: 677- 82.
6. Jensen RS. Pilot judgment and crew resource management. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing; 1995.
7. Kearns SK. e-CRM: the advantages and challenges of computerbased pilot safety training. In: Proceedings of the 53 rd Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; October 19-23, 2009; San Antonio, TX. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2009: 1569-73.
8. Kearns SK. E-learning in aviation. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate; 2010.
9. Khatwa R, Helmreich RL. Analysis of critical factors during approach and landing in accidents and normal flight: data acquisition and analysis working group final report. In: Flight Safety Digest: Killers in Aviation: FSF task force presents facts about approach-and-landing and controlled-flight-into-terrain accidents. Nov-Dec 1998/Jan-Feb1999:1-77.
10. Kontogiannis T, Malakis S. A proactive approach to human error detection and identification in aviation and air traffic control. Saf Sci 2009; 47: 693-706.
11. Kraiger K, Ford JK, Salas E. Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. J Appl Psychol 1993; 78: 311-28.
12. Loukopoulos LD, Dismukes RK, Barshi I. The perils of multitasking. AeroSafety World 2009; 4(8):18-23. Retrieved 23 October 2013 from http://flightsafety.org/aerosafety-world-magazine/.
13. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). Loss of Control on Approach, Colgan Air, Inc., Operating as Continental Connection Flight 3407, Bombardier DHC-8-400, N200WQ, Clarence Center, New York, February 12, 2009. Washington, DC: NTSB; 2010. Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR- 10/01.
14. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). Safety study: a review of flightcrew-involved, major accidents of U.S. air carriers, 1978 through 1990. Washington, DC: National Technical Information Service; 1994. Report No.: NTSB/SS-94/01.
15. Orlady LM. Airline pilot training today and tomorrow. In: Kanki B, Helmreich R, Anca J, eds. Crew resource management, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2010.
16. Paas F, Renkl A, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educ Psychol 2003; 38: 1-4.
17. Salas E, Wilson KA, Burke CS, Wightman DC. Does crew resource management training work? An update, an extension, and some critical needs. Hum Factors 2006; 48: 392-412.
18. Sarter NB, Alexander HM. Error types and related error detection mechanisms in the aviation domain: an analysis of aviation safety reporting system incident reports. Int J Aviat Psychol 2000; 10: 189-206.
19. Shappell SA, Weigmann DA. A human error approach to aviation accident analysis. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate; 2003.
20. Sumwalt RL. Enhancing flight crew monitoring skills can increase flight safety. Flight Saf Dig 1999; 18 (3): 1-8.
21. Sumwalt RL, Lemos KA. The accident investigator's perspective. In: Kanki B, Helmreich R, Anca J, eds. Crew resource management, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2010.
22. Sumwalt RL, Morrison R, Watson A, Taube E, Jensen RS, Rakovan L. What ASRS data tell about inadequate flight crew monitoring. In: Jensen RS, Rakovan L, eds. Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Dayton, OH: Wright State University; 1997.
23. Sumwalt III RL, Thomas RJ, Dismukes RK. Enhancing flight crew monitoring skills can increase flight safety. In: Proceedings of the 55 th International Air Safety Seminar; 2002 November 4-7; Dublin, Ireland. Alexandria, VA: Flight Safety Foundation; 2002:175-206.
24. Thomas MJW. Predictors of threat and error management: identification of core non-technical skills and implications for training systems design. Int J Aviat Psychol 2004; 14: 207-31.
25. Thomas MJW. Error management training: an investigation of expert pilots' error management strategies during normal line operations and training: final report. Adelaide, SA, Australia: University of South Australia; 2005. No. 2004/0050-ATSB Aviation Safety Research Grant Scheme Project.
26. Thomas MJW, Petrilli RM. Crew familiarity: operational experience, non-technical performance, and error management. Aviat Space Environ Med 2006; 77: 41-5.
27. Tullo FJ. Teamwork and organizational factors. In: Kanki B, Helmreich R, Anca J, eds. Crew resource management, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 2010.