Timing of complications and length of stay after rectal cancer surgery

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 218, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 914-919

  Huebner, Marianne ^a,b   Hübner, Martin ^c   Cima, Robert R ^b   Larson, David W ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSCESS; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; ILEUS; KIDNEY FAILURE; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM CANCER; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SMALL INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; WOUND INFECTION;

COLECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84898834039     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: 18791190     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.042     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. J.W.T. Dekker, G.A. Gooiker, and L.G.M. van der Geest et al. Use of different comorbidity scores for risk-adjustment in the evaluation of quality of colorectal cancer surgery: does it matter? Eur J Surg Oncol 38 2012 1071 1078
2. M.E. Cohen, K.Y. Bilimoria, and C.Y. Ko et al. Variability in length of stay after colorectal surgery: assessment of 182 hospitals in the national surgical quality improvement program Ann Surg 250 2009 901 907
3. Kirchhoff P, Clavien P-A, Hahnloser D. Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies. Patient Saf Surg 2010;4. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1754-9493-4-5.pdf. Accessed July 6, 2013.
4. R.B. Hines, C. Chatla, and H.L. Bumpers et al. Predictive capacity of three comorbidity indices in estimating mortality after surgery for colon cancer J Clin Oncol 27 2009 4339 4345
5. M. Kelly, L. Sharp, and F. Dwane et al. Factors predicting hospital length-of-stay and readmission after colorectal resection: a population-based study of elective and emergency admissions BMC Health Serv Res 12 2012 77
6. M. Kusters, C.J.H. Velde, and R.G.H. Beets-Tan et al. Patterns of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a single-center experience Ann Surg Oncol 16 2008 289 296
7. R. Sutradhar, S. Forbes, and D. Urbach et al. Multistate models for comparing trends in hospitalizations among young adult survivors of colorectal cancer and matched controls BMC Health Serv Res 12 2012 353
8. V. Dancourt, C. Quantin, and M. Abrahamowicz et al. Modeling recurrence in colorectal cancer J Clin Epidemiol 57 2004 243 251
9. J.K. Lovely, P.M. Maxson, and A.K. Jacob et al. Case-matched series of enhanced versus standard recovery pathway in minimally invasive colorectal surgery Br J Surg 99 2012 120 126
10. M. Hübner, J.K. Lovely, and M. Huebner et al. Intrathecal analgesia and restrictive perioperative fluid management within enhanced recovery pathway: hemodynamic implications J Am Coll Surg 216 2013 1124 1134
11. D. Firth Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates Biometrika 80 1993 27 38
12. Putter H. Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models analyses using the mstate package. 2011 Available at: http://cran.rapporter.net/web/packages/mstate/vignettes/Tutorial.pdf. Accessed July 6, 2013.
13. W.G. Manning, and J. Mullahy Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform? J Health Econ 20 2001 461 494
14. R Development Core Team. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013. Available from: http://www.R-project.org. Accessed April 1, 2013.
15. L.C. De Wreede, M. Fiocco, and H. Putter mstate: An R package for the analysis of competing risks and multi-state models J Stat Softw 38 2011
16. J. Hardt, M. Schwarzbach, and T. Hasenberg et al. The effect of a clinical pathway for enhanced recovery of rectal resections on perioperative quality of care Int J Colorectal Dis 28 2013 1019 1026
17. C. Keane, S. Savage, and K. McFarlane et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional care in colonic and rectal surgery ANZ J Surg 82 2012 697 703
18. P.O. Hendry, J. Hausel, and J. Nygren et al. Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme Br J Surg 96 2009 197 205
19. J.K. Lawrence, D.S. Keller, and H. Samia et al. Discharge within 24 to 72 hours of colorectal surgery is associated with low readmission rates when using Enhanced Recovery Pathways J Am Coll Surg 216 2013 390 394