Perceptual fidelity aware mean squared error

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 705-712

  Xue, Wufeng ^a,b   Mou, Xuanqin ^a   Zhang, Lei ^b   Feng, Xiangchu ^c  

^a XI'AN JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^c XI'AN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE CODING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

EUCLIDEAN DISTANCE; IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT (IQA); MEAN SQUARED ERROR; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; PERCEPTUAL FIDELITY; PERCEPTUAL IMAGE CODING; PERCEPTUAL QUALITY; STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY INDICES (SSIM);

MEAN SQUARE ERROR;

EID: 84898815250     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2013.93     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. D. Brunet, E. R. Vrscay, and Z. Wang. On the mathematical properties of the structural similarity index. IEEE TIP, 21:1488-1499, 2012.
2. G. Cheng, J. Huang, C. Zhu, Z. Liu, and L. Cheng. Perceptual image quality assessment using a geometric structural distortion model. In IEEE ICIP, pages 325-328, 2010.
3. J. Daitch and D. Green. Contrast sensitivity of the human peripheral retina. Vision Research, 9(8):947-952, 1969.
4. S. J. Daly. Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In SPIE/IS&T Electronic Imaging, pages 2-15, 1992.
5. J. E. Dowling. The retina: an approachable part of the brain. Optometry and Vision Science, 65, 1988.
6. D. Gabor. Information theory in electron microscopy. Laboratory Investigation, 14:801-807, 1965.
7. R. M. Gray. Toeplitz and Circulant Matrices: A Review. Foundations and Trends in Communications and Information Theory, 2:155-239, 2005.
8. V. Q. E. Group et al. Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment, phase II. VQEG, Aug, 2003.
9. K. Hirakawa and T. Parks. Image denoising using total least squares. TIP, 15(9):2730-2742, 2006.
10. E. Larson and D. Chandler. Most apparent distortion: fullreference image quality assessment and the role of strategy. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 19(1), 2010.
11. M. Lindenbaum, M. Fischer, and A. M. Bruckstein. On Gabor's contribution to image enhancement. Pattern Recognition, 27:1-8, 1994.
12. J. L. Mannos and D. J. Sakrison. The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of images. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 20:525-536, 1974.
13. T. Mitsa, K. L. Varkur, and J. R. Alford. Frequencychannel-based visual models as quantitative quality measures in halftoning. In IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging, pages 390-401, 1993.
14. J. B. Mulligan and A. J. Ahumada Jr. Principled halftoning based on human vision models. In SPIE/IS&T Electronic Imaging, pages 109-121, 1992.
15. N. Ponomarenko, V. Lukin, A. Zelensky, K. Egiazarian, M. Carli, and F. Battisti. TID2008-a database for evaluation of full-reference visual quality assessment metrics. Advances of Modern Radioelectronics, 10(10):30-45, 2009.
16. A. Rehman and Z. Wang. SSIM-based non-local means image denoising. In IEEE ICIP, pages 217-220, 2011.
17. A. Rehman, Z. Wang, D. Brunet, and E. R. Vrscay. SSIMinspired image denoising using sparse representations. In IEEE ICASSP, pages 1121-1124, 2011.
18. H. Sheikh and A. Bovik. Image information and visual quality. TIP, 15(2):430-444, 2006.
19. H. Sheikh, A. Bovik, and G. De Veciana. An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics. TIP, 14(12):2117-2128, 2005.
20. H. Sheikh, Z. Wang, L. Cormack, and A. Bovik. Live image quality assessment database release 2 (2005).
21. A. W. M. Smeulders, M. Worring, S. Santini, A. Gupta, and R. Jain. Content-Based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE TPAMI, 22:1349-1380, 2000.
22. M. Spiegel, S. Lipcshutz, and D. Spellman. Vector Analysis (2nd Edition). Foundations and Trends in Communications and Information Theory, 2009.
23. S. Wang, A. Rehman, Z. Wang, S. Ma, and W. Gao. Rate-SSIM optimization for video coding. In IEEE ICASSP, pages 833-836, 2011.
24. Z.Wang and A. Bovik. Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? a new look at signal fidelity measures. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 26(1):98-117, 2009.
25. Z. Wang, A. Bovik, H. Sheikh, and E. Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE TIP, 13(4):600-612, 2004.
26. Z. Wang and E. P. Simoncelli. Maximum differentiation (mad) competition: A methodology for comparing computational models of perceptual quantities. Journal of Vision, 8(12), 2008.
27. Y. Wong, S. Chen, S. Mau, C. Sanderson, and B. C. Lovell. Patch-based probabilistic image quality assessment for face selection and improved video-based face recognition. In CVPR, pages 74-81, 2011.
28. W. Xue and X. Mou. An image quality assessment metric based on non-shift edge. In ICIP, pages 3309-3312, 2011.
29. H. Yan, L. Cervino, X. Jia, and S. B. Jiang. A comprehensive study on the relationship between the image quality and imaging dose in low-dose cone beam CT. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 57:2063-2080, 2012.
30. L. Zhang, L. Zhang, X. Mou, and D. Zhang. Fsim: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE TIP, 20(8):2378-2386, 2011.
31. M. Zhang, X. Mou, and L. Zhang. Non-shift edge based ratio (nser): An image quality assessment metric based on early vision features. IEEE SPL, (99):1-1, 2011.