Active MAP inference in CRFs for efficient semantic segmentation

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 2312-2319

  Roig, Gemma ^a   Boix, Xavier ^a   Nijs, Roderick De ^b   Ramos, Sebastian ^c   Kuhnlenz, Koljia ^b   Gool, Luc Van ^a,d  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c Barcelona Perception Computing Lab   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE SEGMENTATION; SEMANTICS;

COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; EFFICIENCY GAIN; ENERGY FUNCTIONS; MAP INFERENCES; MAP-LABELING; ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE; SEMANTIC IMAGE SEGMENTATIONS; SEMANTIC SEGMENTATION;

INFERENCE ENGINES;

EID: 84898811016     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2013.287     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. R. Achanta, A. Shaji, K. Smith, A. Lucchi, P. Fua, and S. S̈usstrunk. Slic superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods. PAMI, 2012.
2. X. Boix, J. M. Gonfaus, J. van de Weijer, A. D. Bagdanov, J. Serrat, and J. Gonz̀alez. Harmony potentials-fusing global and local scale for semantic image segmentation. IJCV, 2012.
3. Y. Boykov and V. Kolmogorov. An experimental comparison of mincut/max-flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision. PAMI, 2004.
4. G. Csurka and F. Perronnin. An efficient approach to semantic segmentation. IJCV, 2010.
5. M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. I.Williams, J.Winn, and A. Zisserman. The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge 2010.
6. B. Fulkerson, A. Vedaldi, and S. Soatto. Class segmentation and object localization with superpixel neighborhoods. In ICCV, 2009.
7. S. Gould, J. Rodgers, D. Cohen, G. Elidan, and D. Koller. Multi-class segmentation with relative location prior. IJCV, 2008.
8. J. Jiang and Z. Tu. Efficient scale space auto-context for image segmentation and labeling. In CVPR, 2009.
9. P. Kohli, L. Ladicky, and P. Torr. Robust higher order potentials for enforcing label consistency. IJCV, 2009.
10. V. Kolmogorov and M. J. Wainwright. On optimality properties of tree-reweighted message-passing. In UAI, 2005.
11. J. Lafferty, A. McCallum, and F. Pereira. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In ICML, 2001.
12. A. Lucchi, Y. Li, X. Boix, K. Smith, and P. Fua. Are spatial and global constraints really necessary for segmentation In ICCV, 2011.
13. M. Maire, S. X. Yu, and P. Perona. Object detection and segmentation from joint embedding of parts and pixels. In ICCV, 2011.
14. D. Munoz, J. A. Bagnell, and M. Hebert. Stacked hierarchical labeling. In ECCV, 2010.
15. C. Pantofaru, C. Schmid, and M. Hebert. Object recognition by integrating multiple image segmentations. In ECCV, 2008.
16. G. Papandreou and A. Yuille. Perturb-and-map random fields: Using discrete optimization to learn and sample from energy models. In ICCV, 2011.
17. N. Plath, M. Toussaint, and S. Nakajima. Multi-class image segmentation using conditional random fields and global classification. In ICML, 2009.
18. B. Settles. Active learning literature survey. Computer Sciences Technical Report 1648. University of WisconsinMadison, 2009.
19. J. Shotton, J.Winn, C. Rother, and A. Criminisi. Textonboost for image understanding: Multi-class object recognition and segmentation by jointly modeling texture, layout, and context. IJCV, 2009.
20. D. Tarlow, R. Adams, and R. Zemel. Randomized optimum models for structured prediction. In AISTATS, 2012.
21. J. Verbeek and B. Triggs. Scene segmentation with conditional random fields learned from partially labeled images. In NIPS, 2007.
22. A. Vezhnevets, J. M. Buhmann, and V. Ferrari. Active learning for semantic segmentation with expected change. In CVPR, 2012.
23. M. J.Wainwright, T. S. Jaakkola, and A. S.Willsky. MAP estimation via agreement on trees: Message-passing and linear programming. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2005.