Is there cash in that trash?: Factors influencing industrial symbiosis exchange initiation and completion

Journal of Industrial Ecology

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 268-279

  Paquin, Raymond L ^a   Tilleman, Suzanne G ^b   Howard Grenville, Jennifer ^c  

^a John Molson School of Business   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

By product exchange; Eco industrial development; Industrial ecology; Industrial symbiosis; National Industrial Symbiosis Programme (NISP); Probit analysis

Indexed keywords

STATISTICAL TESTS;

BY-PRODUCT EXCHANGE; ECO-INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS; NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS PROGRAMME (NISP); PROBIT ANALYSIS;

INDUSTRY;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EXCHANGE RATE; FUTURE PROSPECT; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; WASTEWATER;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84898808265     PISSN: 10881980     EISSN: 15309290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12120     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ahuja, G. and R. Katila. 2004. Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management Journal 25(8-9): 887-907.
2. Ashton, W. 2008. Understanding the organization of industrial ecosystems: A social network approach. Journal of Industrial Ecology 12(1): 34-51.
3. Baas, L. W. and F. A. Boons. 2004. An industrial ecology project in practice: Exploring the boundaries of decision-making levels in regional industrial systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 12(8-10): 1073-1085.
4. Behera, S. K., J.-H. Kim, S.-Y. Lee, S. Suh, and H.-S. Park. 2012. Evolution of 'designed' industrial symbiosis networks in the Ulsan Eco-industrial Park: 'Research and development into business' as the enabling framework. Journal of Cleaner Production 29-30: 103-112.
5. Burström, F. and J. Korhonen. 2001. Municipalities and industrial ecology: Reconsidering municipal environmental management. Sustainable Development 9(1): 36-46.
6. Chertow, M. and J. Ehrenfeld. 2012. Organizing self-organizing systems. Journal of Industrial Ecology 16(1): 13-27.
7. Chertow, M. R. 2000. Industrial symbiosis: Literature and taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 25: 313-337.
8. Chertow, M. R. 2007. "Uncovering" industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 11(1): 11-30.
9. Chertow, M. R. and D. R. Lombardi. 2005. Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms. Environmental Science & Technology 39(17): 6535-6541.
10. Cohen-Rosenthal, E. and J. Musnikow, editors. 2003. Eco-industrial strategies: Unleashing synergy between economic development and the environment. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.
11. DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). 2005. Government interpretation of the landfill (England and Wales) regulations 2002 (as amended). London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
12. Denrell, J., C. Fang, and S. G. Winter. 2003. The economics of strategic opportunity. Strategic Management Journal 24(10): 977-990.
13. Doménech, T. and M. Davies. 2010. The role of embeddedness in industrial symbiosis networks: Phases in the evolution of industrial symbiosis networks. Business Strategy and the Environment 20(5): 281-296.
14. Ehrenfeld, J. 2009. A critical view on the social science contribution to industrial ecology. In The social embeddedness of industrial ecology, edited by F. Boons and J. Howard-Grenville. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
15. Ehrenfeld, J. R. and M. R. Chertow. 2002. Industrial symbiosis: The legacy of Kalundborg. In Handbook of industrial ecology, edited by R. U. Ayres and L. W. Ayres. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
16. Ehrenfeld, J. R. and N. Gertler. 1997. Industrial ecology in practice: The evolution of interdependence at Kalundborg. Journal of Industrial Ecology 1(1): 67-79.
17. European Commission. 2011. A resource-efficient Europe-Flagship initiative of the Europe 2020 strategy. Brussels: http://ec.europa.eu/resource-efficient-europe/. Accessed 1 August 2012.
18. Gibbs, D. 2009. Eco-industrial parks and industrial ecology: Strategic niche or mainstream development? In Social embeddedness of industrial ecology, edited by J. Howard-Grenville and F. A. Boons. Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
19. Gibbs, D. and P. Deutz. 2007. Reflections on implementing industrial ecology through eco-industrial park development. Journal of Cleaner Production 15(17): 1683-1695.
20. Gibbs, D., P. Deutz, and A. Proctor. 2005. Industrial ecology and eco-industrial development: A potential paradigm for local and regional development? Regional Studies 39(2): 171-183.
21. Hardy, C. and T. E. Graedel. 2002. Industrial ecosystems as food webs. Journal of Industrial Ecology 6(1): 29-38.
22. Heeres, R. R., W. J. V. Vermeulen, and F. B. de Walle. 2004. Eco-industrial park initiatives in the USA and the Netherlands: First lessons. Journal of Cleaner Production 12(8-10): 985-995.
23. Hewes, A. K. and D. I. Lyons. 2008. The humanistic side of eco-industrial parks: Champions and the role of trust. Regional Studies 42: 1329-1342.
24. HMRC (HM Revenue & Customs). 2008. Landfill tax. National Statistics: HM Revenue & Customs. www.uktradeinfo.com/index.cfm?task = bulllandfill. Accessed 28 July 2008.
25. Jacobsen, N. B. 2006. Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: A quantitative assessment of economic and environmental aspects. Journal of Industrial Ecology 10(1-2): 239-255.
26. Jacobsen, N. B. and S. Anderberg. 2005. Understanding the evolution of industrial symbiosis networks: The case of Kalundborg. In Economics of industrial ecology: Materials, structural change, and spatial scales, edited by J. C. J. M. van den Bergh and M. A. Janssen. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
27. Jensen, P. D., L. Basson, E. E. Hellawell, M. R. Bailey, and M. Leach. 2011. Quantifying 'geographic proximity': Experiences from the United Kingdom's National Industrial Symbiosis Programme. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 55: 703-712.
28. Kennedy, P. 2003. A guide to econometrics. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
29. Kincaid, J. and M. Overcash. 2001. Industrial ecosystem development at the metropolitan level. Journal of Industrial Ecology 5(1): 117-126.
30. Korhonen, J. and J.-P. Snäkin. 2005. Analysing the evolution of industrial ecosystems: Concepts and application. Ecological Economics 52(2): 169-186.
31. Laybourn, P. and D. R. Lombardi. 2012. Industrial symbiosis in European policy. Journal of Industrial Ecology 16(1): 11-12.
32. Laybourn, P. and M. Morrissey. 2009. National Industrial Symbiosis Programme: The pathway to a low carbon sustainable economy. Birmingham, UK: International Synergies, Ltd.
33. Lombardi, D. R. and P. Laybourn. 2012. Redefining industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 16(1): 28-37.
34. Lombardi, D. R., D. Lyons, H. Shi, and A. Agarwal. 2012. Industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 16(1): 2-7.
35. Mirata, M. 2004. Experiences from early stages of a National Industrial Symbiosis Programme in the UK: Determinants and coordination challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production 12: 967-983.
36. NISP (National Industrial Symbiosis Programme). 2006. National Industrial Symbiosis Programme. www.nisp.org.uk/. Accessed 1 May 2006.
37. NISP (National Industrial Symbiosis Programme) and Databuild. 2006. NISP BREW Metrics Report for 2005/2006. Birmingham, UK: National Industrial Symbiosis Programme.
38. NWCI (North West Chemicals Initiative). 2004. Mersey Banks Industrial Symbiosis Project: A study into opportunities for sustainable development through inter-company collaboration. Cheshire, UK: Chemicals Northwest-North West Chemicals Initiative.
39. PaquR. L. and J. Howard-Grenville. 2009. Facilitating regional industrial symbiosis: Network growth in the UK's National Industrial Symbiosis Programme. In The social embeddedness of industrial ecology, edited by F. A. Boons and J. Howard-Grenville. London: Edward Elgar.
40. PaquR. L. and J. Howard-Grenville. 2012. The evolution of facilitated industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 16(1): 83-93.
41. PaquR. L. and J. Howard-Grenville. 2013. Blind dates and arranged marriages: Longitudinal processes of network orchestration. Organization Studies 34(11): 1623-1653.
42. Posch, A. 2010. Industrial recycling networks as starting points for broader sustainability-oriented cooperation? Journal of Industrial Ecology 14(2): 242-257.
43. Ruiz, Y. 2002. United Kingdom input-output analytical tables, 1995, edited by S. Mahajan. South Wales, UK: Office of National Statistics (ONS).
44. Shi, H., M. Chertow, and Y. Song. 2010. Developing country experience with eco-industrial parks: A case study of the Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 18(3): 191-199.
45. StataCorp. 2010. Stata statistical software: Release 11. College Station, TX, USA: StataCorp LP.
46. Tabachnick, B. G. and L. S. Fidell. 2007. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson.
47. Van Beers, D., G. Corder, A. Bossilkov, and R. Van Berkel. 2007. Industrial symbiosis in the Australian minerals industry. Journal of Industrial Ecology 11(1): 55-72.
48. von Malmborg, F. 2004. Networking for knowledge transfer: Towards an understanding of local authority roles in regional industrial ecosystem management. Business Strategy and the Environment 13(5): 334-346.
49. Zhu, Q., E. A. Lowe, Y.-A. Wei, and D. Barnes. 2007. Industrial symbiosis in China: A case study of the Guitang Group. Journal of Industrial Ecology 11(1): 31-42.