Routinely performed multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging helps to differentiate common subtypes of renal tumours

European Radiology

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1068-1080

  Cornelis, F ^a   Tricaud, E ^a   Lasserre, A S ^a   Petitpierre, F ^a   Bernhard, J C ^a   Le Bras, Y ^a   Yacoub, M ^a   Bouzgarrou, M ^a   Ravaud, A ^b   Grenier, N ^a  

^a HÔPITAL PELLEGRIN   (France)

^b HÔPITAL SAINT ANDRÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Diffusion weighted imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Oncocytomas; Renal cell carcinomas; Renal neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SIZE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY ADENOMA; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; ONCOCYTOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADENOMA, OXYPHILIC; ADULT; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOMYOLIPOMA; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84898798808     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3107-z     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lechevallier E, Andre M, Barriol D et al (2000) Fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses with helical CT guidance. Radiology 216:506-510 (Pubitemid 30599874)
2. Eshed I, Elias S, Sidi AA (2004) Diagnostic value of CT-guided biopsy of indeterminate renal masses. Clin Radiol 59:262-267 (Pubitemid 38268127)
3. Fujii Y, Komai Y, Saito K et al (2008) Incidence of benign pathologic lesions at partial nephrectomy for presumed RCC renal masses: Japanese dual-center experience with 176 consecutive patients. Urology 72:598-602
4. Snyder ME, Bach A, Kattan MW, Raj GV, Reuter VE, Russo P (2006) Incidence of benign lesions for clinically localized renal masses smaller than 7 cm in radiological diameter: influence of sex. J Urol 176:2391-2395
5. Breda A, Treat EG, Haft-Candell L et al (2010) Comparison of accuracy of 14-, 18- and 20-G needles in ex-vivo renal mass biopsy: a prospective, blinded study. BJU Int 105:940-945
6. Herts BR, BakerME (1995) The current role of percutaneous biopsy in the evaluation of renal masses. Semin Urol Oncol 13:254-261
7. Heilbrun ME, Zagoria RJ, Garvin AJ et al (2007) CT-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of renal tumors before treatment with percutaneous ablation. AJR 188:1500-1505 (Pubitemid 46866850)
8. Milner J, McNeil B, Alioto J et al (2006) Fat poor renal angiomyolipoma: patient, computerized tomography and histological findings. J Urol 176:905-909 (Pubitemid 44142557)
9. Bosniak MA, Megibow AJ, Hulnick DH, Horii S, Raghavendra BN (1988) CT diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma: the importance of detecting small amounts of fat. AJR 151:497-501
10. Kim JK, Kim SH, Jang YJ et al (2006) Renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from other neoplasms at double-echo chemical shift FLASH MR imaging. Radiology 239:174-180
11. Hindman N, Ngo L, Genega EM et al (2012) Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: can it be differentiated from clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using standard MR techniques? Radiology 265:468-477
12. Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, Tajima T et al (2004) MR imaging of renal cell carcinoma: its role in determining cell type. Radiat Med 22:371-376 (Pubitemid 40144012)
13. OlivaMR, Glickman JN, Zou KH et al (2009) Renal cell carcinoma: t1 and t2 signal intensity characteristics of papillary and clear cell types correlated with pathology. AJR 192:1524-1530
14. Roy C, Sauer B, Lindner V, Lang H, Saussine C, Jacqmin D (2007) MR imaging of papillary renal neoplasms: potential application for characterization of small renal masses. Eur Radiol 17:193-200 (Pubitemid 46063044)
15. Rosenkrantz AB, Niver BE, Fitzgerald EF, Babb JS, Chandarana H, Melamed J (2010) Utility of the apparent diffusion coefficient for distinguishing clear cell renal cell carcinoma of low and high nuclear grade. AJR 195:W344-351
16. Zhang JL, Sigmund EE, Chandarana H et al (2010) Variability of renal apparent diffusion coefficients: limitations of the monoexponential model for diffusion quantification. Radiology 254:783-792
17. Cornelis F, Lasserre AS, Tourdias T et al (2013) Combined late gadolinium-enhanced and double-echo chemical-shift MRI help to differentiate renal oncocytomas with high central t2 signal intensity from renal cell carcinomas. AJR 200:830-838
18. Sasiwimonphan K, Takahashi N, Leibovich BC, Carter RE, Atwell TD, Kawashima A (2012) Small (<4 cm) renal mass: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma utilizing MR imaging. Radiology 263:160-168
19. Busing KA, Kilian AK, Schaible T, Debus A, Weiss C, Neff KW (2008) Reliability and validity of MR image lung volume measurement in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia and in vitro lung models. Radiology 246:553-561
20. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420-428
21. Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 310:170
22. Youden WJ (1950) Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3:32-35
23. Pedrosa I, Sun MR, Spencer M et al (2008) MR imaging of renal masses: correlation with findings at surgery and pathologic analysis. Radiographics 28:985-1003
24. Sun MRM, Ngo L, Genega EM et al (2009) Renal cell carcinoma: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation of tumor subtypes-correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology 250:793-802
25. Vargas HA, Chaim J, Lefkowitz RA et al (2012) Renal cortical tumors: use of multiphasic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to differentiate benign and malignant histologic subtypes. Radiology 264:779-788
26. Wang H, Cheng L, Zhang X et al (2010) Renal cell carcinoma: diffusion-weighted MR imaging for subtype differentiation at 3.0 T. Radiology 257:135-143
27. Pedrosa I, Alsop DC, Rofsky NM (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging as a biomarker in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 115:2334-2345
28. Schatz SM, Lieber MM (2003) Update on oncocytoma. Curr Urol Rep 4:30-35
29. Rosenkrantz AB, Hindman N, Fitzgerald EF, Niver BE, Melamed J, Babb JS (2010)MRI features of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. AJR 195:W421-427
30. Dodelzon K, Mussi TC, Babb JS, Taneja SS, Rosenkrantz AB (2012) Prediction of growth rate of solid renal masses: utility of MR imaging features - preliminary experience. Radiology 262:884-893
31. Harmon WJ, King BF, Lieber MM (1996) Renal oncocytoma: magnetic resonance imaging characteristics. J Urol 155:863-867 (Pubitemid 26052666)
32. Millet I, Doyon FC, Hoa D et al (2011) Characterization of small solid renal lesions: can benign andmalignant tumors be differentiated with CT? AJR 197:887-896
33. Vargas HA, Delaney HG, Delappe EM et al (2013) Multiphasic contrast-enhancedMRI: single-slice versus volumetric quantification of tumor enhancement for the assessment of renal clear-cell carcinoma fuhrman grade. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:1160-1167