HOGgles: Visualizing object detection features

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-8

  Vondrick, Carl ^a   Khosla, Aditya ^a   Malisiewicz, Tomasz ^a   Torralba, Antonio ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

hog; hoggles; object detection; visualization

Indexed keywords

ERRORS; FLOW VISUALIZATION; VISUALIZATION;

DETECTION SYSTEM; FEATURE SPACE; HOG; HOGGLES; INTUITIVE UNDERSTANDING; OBJECT DETECTION; OBJECT DETECTION SYSTEMS; OBJECT DETECTORS;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 84898772394     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2013.8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. A. Alahi, R. Ortiz, and P. Vandergheynst. Freak: Fast retina keypoint. In CVPR, 2012.
2. M. Calonder, V. Lepetit, C. Strecha, and P. Fua. Brief: Binary robust independent elementary features. ECCV, 2010.
3. N. Dalal and B. Triggs. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In CVPR, 2005.
4. E. d'Angelo, A. Alahi, and P. Vandergheynst. Beyond bits: Reconstructing images from local binary descriptors. ICPR, 2012.
5. S. Divvala, A. Efros, and M. Hebert. How important are deformable parts in the deformable parts model? Technical Report, 2012.
6. M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. I.Williams, J.Winn, and A. Zisserman. The pascal visual object classes challenge. IJCV, 2010.
7. P. Felzenszwalb, R. Girshick, and D. McAllester. Cascade object detection with deformable part models. In CVPR, 2010.
8. P. Felzenszwalb, R. Girshick, D. McAllester, and D. Ramanan. Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models. PAMI, 2010.
9. B. Hariharan, J. Malik, and D. Ramanan. Discriminative decorrelation for clustering and classification. ECCV, 2012.
10. D. Hoiem, Y. Chodpathumwan, and Q. Dai. Diagnosing error in object detectors. ECCV, 2012.
11. H. Lee, A. Battle, R. Raina, and A. Ng. Efficient sparse coding algorithms. NIPS, 2007.
12. L. Liu and L. Wang. What has my classifier learned? visualizing the classification rules of bag-of-feature model by support region detection. In CVPR, 2012.
13. D. Lowe. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In ICCV, 1999.
14. J. Mairal, F. Bach, J. Ponce, and G. Sapiro. Online dictionary learning for sparse coding. In ICML, 2009.
15. T. Malisiewicz, A. Gupta, and A. Efros. Ensemble of exemplar-svms for object detection and beyond. In ICCV, 2011.
16. S. Nishimoto, A. Vu, T. Naselaris, Y. Benjamini, B. Yu, and J. Gallant. Reconstructing visual experiences from brain activity evoked by natural movies. Current Biology, 2011.
17. A. Oliva and A. Torralba. Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. IJCV, 2001.
18. D. Parikh and C. Zitnick. Human-debugging of machines. In NIPS WCSSWC, 2011.
19. D. Parikh and C. L. Zitnick. The role of features, algorithms and data in visual recognition. In CVPR, 2010.
20. A. Tatu, F. Lauze, M. Nielsen, and B. Kimia. Exploring the representation capabilities of hog descriptors. In ICCV WIT, 2011.
21. S. Wang, L. Zhang, Y. Liang, and Q. Pan. Semi-coupled dictionary learning with applications to image super-resolution and photosketch synthesis. In CVPR, 2012.
22. P. Weinzaepfel, H. J́egou, and P. Ṕerez. Reconstructing an image from its local descriptors. In CVPR, 2011.
23. J. Yang, J. Wright, T. Huang, and Y. Ma. Image super-resolution via sparse representation. Transactions on Image Processing, 2010.
24. X. Zhu, C. Vondrick, D. Ramanan, and C. Fowlkes. Do we need more training data or better models for object detection? BMVC, 2012.