Reciprocal causality between marine macroalgal diversity and productivity in an upwelling area

Oikos

Volumn 123, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 630-640

  Lanari, Marianna de O ^a,b   Coutinho, Ricardo ^a,c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE   (Brazil)

^c Instituto de Estudos do Mar Almirante Paulo Moreira   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; COEXISTENCE; DOMINANCE; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; MACROALGA; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; UPWELLING;

EID: 84898772164     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00952.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arenas F. et al. 2009. Diversity effects beyond species richness: evidence from intertidal macroalgal assemblages. - Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 381 : 99 - 108.
2. Boyer K. E. et al. 2009. Biodiversity effects on productivity and stability of marine macroalgal communities: the role of environmental context. - Oikos 118 : 1062 - 1072.
3. Bracken M. E. S. and Stachowicz J. J. 2006. Seaweed diversity enhances nitrogen uptake via complementary use of nitrate and ammonium. - Ecology 87 : 2397 - 2403.
4. Bracken M. E. S. and Williams S. L. 2013. Realistic changes in seaweed biodiversity affect multiple ecosystem functions on a rocky shore. - Ecology 94 : 1944 - 1954.
5. Bracken M. E. S. et al. 2011. Herbivores, tidal elevation, and species richness simultaneously mediate nitrate uptake by seaweed assemblages. - Ecology 92 : 1083 - 1093.
6. Bruno J. F. et al. 2005. Effects of macroalgal species identity and richness on primary production in benthic marine communities. - Ecol. Lett. 8 : 1165 - 1174.
7. Bruno J. F. et al. 2006. Partitioning the effects of algal species identity and richness on benthic marine primary production. - Oikos 115 : 170 - 178.
8. Bulleri F. et al. 2012. Temporal stability of European rocky shore assemblages: variation across a latitudinal gradient and the role of habitat-formers. - Oikos 121 : 1801 - 1809.
9. Caliman A. et al. 2010. The prominence of and biases in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research. - Biodivers. Conserv. 19 : 651 - 664.
10. Cardinale B. J. et al. 2005. Diversity-productivity relationships in streams vary as a function of the natural disturbance regime. - Ecology 86 : 716 - 726.
11. Cardinale B. J. et al. 2006a. Biodiversity as both cause and con sequence of resource availability: a study of reciprocal casuality in a predator-prey system. - J. Anim. Ecol. 75 : 497 - 505.
12. Cardinale B. J. et al. 2006b. Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. - Nature 443 : 989 - 992.
13. Cardinale B. J. et al. 2007. Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species comple mentarity. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104 : 18123 - 18128.
14. Cardinale B. J. et al. 2009a. Does productivity drive diversity or vice versa? A test of the multivariate productivity-diversity hypothesis in streams. - Ecology 90 : 1227 - 1241.
15. Cardinale B. J. et al. 2009b. Separating the influence of resource "availability" from resource "imbalance" on productivity- diversity relationships. - Ecol. Lett. 12 : 475 - 87.
16. Cardinale B. J. et al. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impacts on humanity. - Nature 486 : 59 - 67.
17. Coelho-Souza S. A. et al. 2012. Biophysical interactions in the Cabo Frio upwelling system, southeastern Brazil. - Braz. J. Oceanogr. 60 : 353 - 365.
18. Crowe T. P. and Russel R. 2009. Functional and taxonomic perspectives of marine biodiversity: functional diversity and ecosystems processes. - In: Wahl M. (ed), Marine hard bottom communities: patterns, dynamics, diversity and change. Springer, pp. 375 - 390.
19. Crowe T. P. et al. 2012. Reality check: issues of scale and abstraction in biodiversity research and potential solutions. - In: Solan M. et al. (eds), Marine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 185 - 199.
20. Diaz-Pulido G. and Garzón-Ferreira J. 2002. Seasonality in algal assemblages on upwelling-influenced coral reefs in the colombian caribbean. - Bot. Mar. 45 : 284 - 292.
21. Fargione J. et al. 2007. From selection to complementarity: shifts in the causes of biodiversity-productivity relationships in a long-term biodiversity experiment. - Proc. R. Soc. B 274 : 871 - 876.
22. Fridley J. D. 2002. Resource availability dominates and alters the relationship between species diversity and ecosystem productivity in experimental plant communities. - Oecologia 132 : 271 - 277.
23. Graham M. H. and Edwards M. S. 2001. Statistical significance versus fit: estimating the importance of individual factors in ecological analysis of variance. - Oikos 93 : 505 - 513.
24. Griffin J. N. et al. 2009. Spatial heterogeneity increases the importance of species richness for an ecosystem process. - Oikos 118 : 1335 - 1342.
25. Gross K. and Cardinale B. J. 2007. Does species richness drive community production or vice versa? Reconciling historical and contemporary paradigms in competitive communities. - Am. Nat. 170 : 207 - 220.
26. Guimaraens M. A. and Coutinho R. 1996. Spatial and temporal variation of benthic marine algae at the Cabo Frio upwelling region, Rio de Janeiro. - Aquat. Bot. 52 : 283 - 299.
27. Hector A. et al. 2009. The analysis of biodiversity experiments: from pattern toward mechanism. - In: Naeem S. et al. (eds), Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and human wellbeing. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 94 - 104.
28. Hillebrand H. and Matthiessen B. 2009. Biodiversity in a complex world: consolidation and progress in functional biodiversity research. - Ecol. Lett. 12 : 1405 - 1419.
29. Hooper D. U. et al. 2012. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. - Nature 486 : 105 - 108.
30. Hughes A. R. et al. 2007. Reciprocal relationships and potential feedbacks between biodiversity and disturbance. - Ecol. Lett. 10 : 849 - 864.
31. Huston M. A. 1997. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. - Oecologia 110 : 449 - 460.
32. Jiang L. et al. 2009. Species diversity and productivity: why do results of diversity-manipulation experiments differ from natural patterns? - J. Ecol. 97 : 603 - 608.
33. Kraufvelin P. et al. 2010. Biomass, diversity and production of rocky shore macroalgae at two nutrient enrichment and wave action levels. - Mar. Biol. 157 : 29 - 47.
34. Loreau M. 1998. Separating sampling and other effects in biodiversity experiments. - Oikos 82 : 600 - 602.
35. Loreau M. 2000. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. - Oikos 91 : 3 - 17.
36. Loreau M. and Hector A. 2001. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. - Nature 412 : 72 - 76.
37. Loreau M. et al. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. - Science 294 : 804 - 808.
38. Naeem S. 2012. Ecological consequences of declining biodiversity: a biodiversity-ecosystem function (BEF) framework for marine systems. - In: Solan M. et al. (eds), Marine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 34 - 51.
39. Schmid B. 2002. The species richness-productivity controversy. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 : 113 - 114.
40. Schmid B. et al. 2009. Consequences of species loss for ecosystem functioning: meta-analyses of data from biodiversity experiments. - In: Naeem S. et al. (eds), Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and human wellbeing. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 14 - 29.
41. Stachowicz J. J. et al. 2007. Understanding the effects of marine biodiversity on communities and ecosystems. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38 : 739 - 766.
42. Stachowicz J. J. et al. 2008a. Complementarity in marine biodiversity manipulations: reconciling divergent evidence from field and mesocosm experiments. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105 : 18842 - 18847.
43. Stachowicz J. J. et al. 2008b. Diversity enhances cover and stability of seaweed assemblages: the role of heterogeneity and time. - Ecology 89 : 3008 - 3019.
44. Tylianakis J. M. et al. 2008. Resource heterogeneity moderates the biodiversity-function relationship in real world ecosystems. - PLoS Biol. 6 : e122.
45. Wahl M. et al. 2011. Re-structuring of marine communities exposed to environmental change: a global study on the interactive effects of species and functional richness. - PloS ONE 6 : e19514.
46. Weis J. J. et al. 2008. Effects of algal diversity on the production of biomass in homogeneous and heterogeneous nutrient environments: a microcosm experiment. - PloS ONE 3 : e2825.
47. Worm B. and Duffy J. E. 2003. Biodiversity, productivity and stability in real food webs. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 : 20 - 21.
48. Worm B. and Lotze H. K. 2006. Effects of eutrophication, grazing and algal blooms on rocky shores. - Limnol. Oceanogr. 51 : 569 - 579.
49. Worm B. et al. 2002. Consumer versus resource control of species diversity and ecosystem functioning. - Nature 417 : 848 - 851.
50. Worm B. et al. 2006. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. - Science 314 : 787 - 790.