Barriers to the use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care

Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 2-4

  Spertus, John ^a  

^a SAINT LUKE S MID AMERICA HEART INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO ILLNESS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HEART FAILURE; HUMAN; KANSAS CITY CARDIOMYOPATHY QUESTIONNAIRE; MEDICAID; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICARE; NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASS; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION;

HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF REPORT; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84898750192     PISSN: 19417713     EISSN: 19417705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000829     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Green CP, Porter CB, Bresnahan DR, Spertus JA. Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1245-1255
2. Spertus J, Jones P, Poler S, Rocha-Singh K. The peripheral artery questionnaire: a new disease-specific health status measure for patients with peripheral arterial disease. Am Heart J. 2004;147:301-308
3. Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, Deyo RA, Prodzinski J, McDonellM, Fihn SD. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:333-341
4. US Department of Health and Human Services. Guidance for Industry. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims; 2009. Available at: www.fda. gov/downloads/Drugs/ Guidances/UCM193282.pdf). Accessed December 21, 2013
5. Goldman L, Cook EF, Mitchell N, Flatley M, Sherman H, Cohn PF. Pitfalls in the serial assessment of cardiac functional status. How a reduction in "ordinary" activity may reduce the apparent degree of cardiac compromise and give a misleading impression of improvement. J Chronic Dis. 1982;35:763-771
6. Raphael C, Briscoe C, Davies J, Ian Whinnett Z, Manisty C, Sutton R, Mayet J, Francis DP. Limitations of the New York Heart Association functional classification system and self-reported walking distances in chronic heart failure. Heart. 2007;93:476-482
7. Rumsfeld JS. Health status and clinical practice: when will they meet? Circulation. 2002;106:5-7
8. Beltrame JF, Weekes AJ, Morgan C, Tavella R, Spertus JA. The prevalence of weekly angina among patients with chronic stable angina in primary care practices: The Coronary Artery Disease in General Practice (CADENCE) Study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1491-1499