Randomized controlled trial of the shang ring versus conventional surgical techniques for adult male circumcision: Safety and acceptability

Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 447-455

  Sokal, David C ^a   Li, Philip S ^b   Zulu, Robert ^c   Awori, Quentin D ^d   Combes, Stephanie L ^a   Simba, Raymond O ^e   Lee, Richard ^b   Hart, Catherine ^a   Perchal, Paul ^f   Hawry, Hayden J ^g   Bowa, Kasonde ^c,h   Goldstein, Marc ^a   Barone, Mark A ^f  

^a FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITAL   (Zambia)

^d Engender Health ^*  (Kenya)

^e Homa Bay District Hospital   (Kenya)

^f ENGENDERHEALTH   (United States)

^g Society for Family Health   (Zambia)

^h Department of Environmental and Plant Sciences   (Zambia)

Author keywords

Device; Male circumcision; Randomized controlled trial; Shang Ring

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANESTHESIA COMPLICATION; CIRCUMCISION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL CIRCUMCISION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KENYA; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE EDEMA; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SHANG RING CIRCUMCISION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WOUND DEHISCENCE; WOUND HEALING; WOUND INFECTION; ZAMBIA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CIRCUMCISION, MALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KENYA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; YOUNG ADULT; ZAMBIA;

EID: 84898748665     PISSN: 15254135     EISSN: 10779450     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000061     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. World Health Organization Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS. New Data on Male Circumcision and HIV Prevention: Policy and Programme Implications. Montreux, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2007
2. Gray R, Kigozi G, Kong X, et al. The effectiveness of male circumcision for HIV prevention and effects on risk behaviors in a posttrial follow-up study. AIDS. 2012;26:609-615
3. Bailey R, Moses S, Parker C, et al. The protective effect of adult male circumcision against HIV acquisition is sustained for at least 54 months: Results from the Kisumu, Kenya trial. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International AIDS Conference, Vienna, Austria
4. Auvert B, Taljaard D, Sitta R, et al. Decrease of HIV prevalence over time among the male population of Orange Farm, South Africa, following a circumcision roll-out (ANRS-12126). Proceedings of the Nineteenth International AIDS Conference, Washington DC, WA, 2012
5. Zetola N, Klausner JD. Male circumcision reduces human papillomavirus incidence and prevalence: Clarifying the evidence. Sexually Transm Dis. 2012;39:114-115
6. Peng YF, Cheng Y, Wang GY, et al. Clinical application of a new device for minimally invasive circumcision. Asian J Androl. 2008;10:447-454
7. Cheng Y, Peng YF, Liu YD, et al. [A recommendable standard protocol of adult male circumcision with the Chinese Shang Ring: Outcomes of 328 cases in China]. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2009;15:584-592
8. Peng YF, Yang BH, Jia C, Jiang J. [Standardized male circumcision with Shang Ring reduces postoperative complications: A report of 351 cases]. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2010;16:963-966
9. Li HN, Xu J, Qu LM. [Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional surgical procedures: Comparison of clinical effectiveness]. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2010;16:325-327
10. Barone MA, Ndede F, Li PS, et al. The Shang Ring device for adult male circumcision: A proof of concept study in Kenya. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;57:e7-12
11. Barone MA, Awori QD, Li PS, et al. Randomized trial of the Shang Ring for adult male circumcision with removal at one to three weeks: Delayed removal leads to detachment. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;60: E82-89
12. Masson P, Li PS, Barone MA, Goldstein M. The ShangRing device for simplified adult circumcision. Nature Rev Urol. 2010;7:638-642
13. WHO, UNAIDS, JHPIEGO. Manual for Male Circumcision Under Local Anaesthesia. Version 3.1. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2009
14. USFDA. What is a Serious Adverse Event http://www.fda.gov/safety/ medwatch/howtoreport/ucm053087.htm. Accessed August 28, 2012
15. Rech D, Dickson K, Samkange C, et al. Adverse Event Action Guide for Male Circumcision. Washington DC: PSI and WHO; 2011
16. Cheng Y, Li PS. Male Circumcision Using the Shang Ring. Beijing, China: Peoplés Medical Publishing House; 2012
17. Kigozi G, Gray RH, Wawer MJ, et al. The safety of adult male circumcision in HIV-infected and uninfected men in Rakai, Uganda. PLos Med. 2008;5:e116
18. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: A review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nursing. 2005;14:798-804
19. World Health Organization. Framework for Clinical Evaluation of Devices for Adult Male Circumcision. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2011
20. Stokes M, Davis C, Koch G. Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System. 2nd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2000
21. Kigozi G, Musoke R, Watya S, et al. The acceptability and safety of the Shang Ring for adult male circumcision in Rakai, Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63:617-621
22. Lagarde E, Taljaard D, Puren A, Auvert B. High rate of adverse events following circumcision of young male adults with the Tara KLamp technique: A randomised trial in South Africa. South African Med J. 2009;99: 163-169
23. Decastro B, Gurski J, Peterson A. Adult template circumcision: A prospective, randomized, patient-blinded, comparative study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel circumcision device. Urology. 2010;76: 810-814
24. Senel FM, Demirelli M, Pekcan H. Mass circumcision with a novel plastic clamp technique. Urology. 2011;78:174-179
25. Bratt JH, Zyambo Z. Comparing direct costs of facility-based Shang Ring provision versus a standard surgical technique for voluntary medical male circumcision in Zambia. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013; 63:e109-112
26. Mutabazi V, Kaplan SA, Rwamasirabo E, et al. HIV prevention: Male circumcision comparison between a nonsurgical device to a surgical technique in resource-limited settings: A prospective, randomized, nonmasked trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;61:49-55