The study on safety goals and public acceptance of nuclear power

Energy Procedia

Volumn 39, Issue , 2013, Pages 415-422

  Li, Chao Jun ^a   Zhang, Chun Ming ^a   Chen, Yan ^a   Zuo, Jia Xu ^a   Chen, Jia Yun ^b  

^a NANJING INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

^b CANCER HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Nuclear power plant; Nuclear safety; Public acceptance; Safety goals

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898742757     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.231     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group. Safety Culture; 1992.
2. US NRC. Safety Goals for the Operation of Nuclear Power Plants: Policy Statement. Federal Register 51FR28044; 1986.
3. US NRC. SECY-01-0009: Modified Reactor Safety Goal Policy Statement; 2001.
4. Zhang Yong-fa, Tong Jie-juan, Cai Qi Pilot study of the safety goal of marine nuclear power installation. Chinese Journal of Nuclear Science and Engineering. 2011, p. 53-60.
5. Shi Zhen-gang, Zhang Zuo-yi, Xue Lan. Public Acceptance Study of Nuclear Energy. Chinese Journal of International Science and Technology; 2000, p. 71-75.
6. XI Shu-ren. Nuclear power plant probabilistic risk evaluation and analysis. Tsinghua University Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Bei Jing: Tsinghua-Publishing; 2003, p. 44-45.
7. http://www.gallup.com/poll/153452/americans-favor-nuclear-power-year. aspx.
8. http://h.sojump.com/viewstat/1108136.aspx.
9. US NRC. Workshop on Frameworks for Developing a safety Goal, NUREG/CP-0018; 1981.
10. Forsberg C. W. Passive and inherent safety technologies for light-water nuclear reactors, CONF-900828-4; 1990.