Factors influencing the likelihood of instrumental delivery success

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 123, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 796-803

  Aiken, Catherine E ^a   Aiken, Abigail R ^b   Brockelsby, Jeremy C ^b   Scott, James G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASIAN; BIRTH WEIGHT; BODY MASS; CAUCASIAN; CESAREAN SECTION; CHINESE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; ETHNICITY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; FORCEPS; FORCEPS DELIVERY; GESTATIONAL AGE; GYNECOLOGICAL AND OBSTETRIC EQUIPMENT; HEAD POSITION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR STAGE 2; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NEGRO; NIGHT WORK; OBSTETRICIAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; ROTATION; VACUUM EXTRACTION; VAGINAL DELIVERY; VENTOUSE;

ADULT; BIRTH WEIGHT; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EXTRACTION, OBSTETRICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; LOGISTIC MODELS; MATERNAL AGE; OBSTETRICAL FORCEPS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84898730593     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000188     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Majoko F, Gardener G. Trial of instrumental delivery in theatre versus immediate caesarean section for anticipated difficult assisted births. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012;CD005545. doi:10.1002/14651858. CD005545.pub3.
2. Schiff E, Friedman SA, Zolti M, Avraham A, Kayam Z, Mashiach S, et al. A matched controlled study of Kielland's forceps for transverse arrest of the fetal vertex. J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;21:576-9.
3. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Hauth JC, Landon MB, Gilbert S, Spong CY, et al. Failed operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1017-22.
4. Melamed N, Segev M, Hadar E, Peled Y, Wiznitzer A, Yogev Y. Outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section in women with past failed operative vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:49.e1-7.
5. Wang Y, Tanbo T, Abyholm T, Henriksen T. The impact of advanced maternal age and parity on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;284:31-7.
6. Schuit E, Kwee A, Westerhuis ME, Van Dessel HJ, Graziosi GC, Van Lith JM, et al. A clinical prediction model to assess the risk of operative delivery. BJOG 2012;119:915-23.
7. Sharma V, Colleran G, Dineen B, Hession MB, Avalos G, Morrison JJ. Factors influencing delivery mode for nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation during a 17-year period. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;147:173-7.
8. McKelvey A, Ashe R, McKenna D, Roberts R. Caesarean section in the second stage of labour: a retrospective review of obstetric setting and morbidity. J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;30: 264-7.
9. Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ. Greentop guideline 62; operative vaginal delivery. UK: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2011.
10. Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, Olshen RA. Classification and regression trees. 2nd ed. Belmont (CA): Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1984.
11. Senecal J, Xiong X, Fraser WD. Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:763-72.
12. Al-Suhel R, Gill S, Robson S, Shadbolt B. Kjelland's forceps in the new millennium. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted rotational forceps delivery. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;49:510-4.
13. Tempest N, Hart A, Walkinshaw S, Hapangama D. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour. BJOG 2013;120:1277-84.
14. O'Mahony F, Hofmeyr GJ, Menon V. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010;CD005455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005455.pub2.
15. Ben-Haroush A, Melamed N, Kaplan B, Yogev Y. Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery: a single-center experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:308e1-5.
16. Abenhaim HA, Morin L, Benjamin A, Kinch RA. Effect of instrument preference for operative deliveries on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;134:164-8.
17. Dhanjal MK, Kenyon A. Scientific impact paper no. 34: Induction of labour at term in older mothers. London (UK): Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2013.
18. Al-Kadri H, Sabr Y, Al-Saif S, Abulaimoun B, Ba'Aqeel H, Saleh A. Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:642-8.
19. Gopalani S, Bennett K, Critchlow C. Factors predictive of failed operative vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191: 896-902.
20. Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Silberstein T, Hallak M, Katz M, Mazor M. Failed vacuum extraction. Maternal risk factors and pregnancy outcome. J Reprod Med 2001;46:819-24.