Assessment of solid sorbents as a competitive post-combustion CO 2 capture technology

Energy Procedia

Volumn 37, Issue , 2013, Pages 65-72

  Glier, Justin C ^a,b   Rubina, Edward S ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Post combustion; Solid sorbents

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898728744     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.05.086     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change: Synthesis Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007.
2. 2.ucsd.edu.
3. Department of Energy/National Energy Technology Laboratory. DOE/NETL Advanced Carbon Dioxide Capture R&D Program: Technology Update. 2010.
4. Choi S, Drese JH, Jones CW. Adsorbent materials for carbon dioxide capture from large anthropogenic point sources. ChemSusChem 2009;2:796-854.
5. D'Alcssandro DM, Smit B, Long JR. Carbon dioxide capture: Prospects for new materials. Angewandte Chcmic International Edition 2010;49:6058-6082.
6. Miller DC, Agarwal DA, Sun X, Tong C. CCSI and the role of advanced computing in accelletating the commercial deployment of carbon capture systems. Argonne National Laboratory. Accessed October 10, 2012.
7. 2 capture systems utilizing amine-enriched solid sorbents. Final report. United States Department of Energ/National Energy Technology Laboratory 2005.
8. Yang WC, Hoffman J. Exploratory design study on reactor configurations for carbon dioxide capture from conventional power plants employing regenerable solid sorbents. Ind Eng Chem Res 2009;48:341-351.
9. Berkenpas MB, Rubin ES, Zaremsky CJ. User Manual: Integrated Environmental Control Model. Carnegie Mellon University. Revised May, 2007. Available from .
10. U.S. Department of Energy/National Energy Technology Laboratory. Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants (Revision 2). Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity. U.S. DOE/NETL. 2010.
11. 2 capture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res;2012:6907-6915.
12. 2 on triamine-grafted poreexpanded mesoporous MCM-41 silica. Energy and Fuels;2011:1310-1315.
13. 2 capture. Doctoral Thesis. Carnegie Mellon University. 2012. Adapted from page Figure 3-9.
14. Britt D, Furukawa H, Wang B, Glover TG, Yaghi OM. Highly efficient separation of carbon dioxide by a metal-organic framework replete with open metal sites. PNAS 2009;106:20637-20640.
15. Wong-Foy AG, Matzger AJ, Yaghi OM. Exceptional H2 saturation uptake in microporous metal organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:3494-3495.
16. Mason JA, Sumida K, Herm ZR, Krishna R, Long JR. Evaluating metal-organic frameworks for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture via temperature swing adsorption. Supplementary Material (ESI) for Energy and Environmental Science. 2011.
17. 2 capture from coal-fired power plants: A final report. DOE/NETL Award Number DE-NT0005649. Report Number 05649FR01. 2011.
18. U.S. Department of Energy/National Energy Technology Laboratory. Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants (Revision 2). Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity. U.S. DOE/NETL. 2010.
19. Tribe MA., Alpine RLW. Scalc economics and the "0.6 rule". Engineering Costs and Production Economics 1986;10:271- 278.
20. Electric Power Research Institute. Technical Assessment Guide, volume 1: Electricity supply, P-4463-SR. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. 1986.
21. Katzer, J, et al. The Future of Coal. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.2007.
22. Alstom. Cost assessment of fossil power plants. Proceedings of the POWER-GEN Europe Conference. Milan, Italy. 2011.
23. 2 Capture Technology Meeting. August 22, 2011. DOE/NETL, 2011.
24. U.S. Department of Energy/National Energy Technology Laboratory. DOE/NETL Advancd carbon capture and storage R&D Roadmap. DOE/NETL. 2010.