Co2 storage contingencies initiative: Detection, intervention and remediation of unexpected CO2 migration

Energy Procedia

Volumn 37, Issue , 2013, Pages 7802-7814

  Imbus, Scott W ^a   Dodds, Kevin ^b   Otto, Claus J ^c   Trautz, Robert C ^d   Christopher, Charles A ^e   Agarwal, Anshul ^f   Benson, Sally M ^f  

^a CHEVRON ENERGY TECHNOLOGY COMPANY   (United States)

^b BP AMERICA INC   (United States)

^c SHELL GLOBAL SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL B V   (United States)

^d ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e CO2Store ^*  (United States)

^f STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide storage; Contingency; Detection; Field trial; Intervention; Leakage; Modelling; Monitoring; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898727123     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.343     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Kuuskraa V. PIER white paper on overview of mitigation and remediation options for geological storage CO2. In: Burton E and Myhre R eds. Assessment of Geological Carbon Sequestration in California 2008; CEC-500-2008-009.
2. 2 Storage Projects. In: Wilson M, Morris T, Gale J, Thambimuthu K, editors. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Oxford: Elsevier; 2005, Vol. II, Part 1, p. 1329-1338.
3. Zhang Y, Oldenburg CM, Benson SM. Vadose zone remediation of carbon dioxide leakage from geologic carbon dioxide sequestration sites . Vadose Zone J 2004; 3:858-66.
4. 2 from geologic storage sites into surface water. Environmental Geology 2006; 50:691-705.
5. Esposito A, Benson SM. Evaluation and development of options for remediation of leakage into groundwater aquifers from CO2 storage reservoirs. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2012; 7:62-72.
6. 2GeoNet Venice Open Forum 2010 Poster.http://www.co2geonet.com/UserFiles/file/ posters%20Open%20Forum%202010/poster-Rohmer.pdf.
7. 2 on a shallow groundwater system: A controlled release field experiment. Environ Sci Technol 2012; [In Press].
8. 2Capture Project, Oxford: Elsevier; 2005, Vol. 2, p. 1133- 1141.
9. 2 from storage reservoirs: Identification of features, events, and processes and lessons learned. Environmental Geology 2007; 52:457-67.
10. 2 Capture Project, Oxford: Elsevier; 2005, Vol. 2, p. 815-25.
11. Celia MA, Nordbotten JM, Bachu S, Dobossy M, Court b, Risk of leakage versus depth of injection in geological storage. Energy Procedia 2009; 1:2573-80.
12. 2. Int. J Greenhouse Gas Control 2011; 5:336-46.
13. 2. Greenhouse Gas Sci Technol 2011;1:237-47(2011).
14. Skinner L. CO2 blowouts, an emerging problem. World Oil 2003; 224:38-42.
15. 2 geologic storage: What do we know? Int. J Greenhouse Gas Control 2011; 5:826-40.
16. 2 exposure from the SACROC Unit, West Texas, USA. Int. J Greenhouse Gas Control 2007; 1: 75-85.
17. 2 producer. Int J Greengouse Gas Control 2010; 4:186-07.
18. 2 injection laboratory and field studies. Energy Procedia 2009;1:1957-64.
19. Sweatman R.(Halliburton) Personal communication 2011.
20. Cunningham AB, Gerlach R, Spangler L, Mitchell AC, Parks S, Phillips A. Reducing the risk of well bore leakage using engineered biomineralization barriers. Energy Procedia 2011;4: 5178-85.
21. 2 Injection Program. Next generation CO2 enhanced oil recovery. Website: Http://www.fe.doe.gov/programs/oilgas/eor/.
22. 2 in the fluvial Tubaen Fm. 11th Int. Conf. Greenhouse Gas Contr. Tech abstract., Kyoto 2012.
23. 2 storage site. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2010; 4:242-48.
24. 2 Sequestration Sites and its Applicability to the Two Elk Energy Park in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming. Stanford University Masters Thesis 2012.
25. Trigilio M, Mills J, Brown A. Personal communication. April 19 2011 Billings, MT, USA.
26. 2 leakage from deep saline aquifers. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2012; 9:62-71.
27. 2 sequestration project in a mature oil field, Teapot Dome, WY. Stanford University Doctoral Dissertation 2008; 192p.