Vulnerability analysis of symbiosis networks of industrial ecology parksa

Procedia Computer Science

Volumn 17, Issue , 2013, Pages 965-972

  Zeng, Yu ^a,b   Xiao, Renbin ^a   Li, Xiangmei ^a  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b HUBEI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Industrial Ecology Park; Node Importance; Social Network Analysis; Vulnerability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898712923     PISSN: 18770509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.123     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Cote RP, Kelly T et al. The industrial park as an ecosystem: sectoral case studies. Halifax (Nova Scotia, Canada):Dalhousie University, School for Resource and Environmental Studies; 1996.
2. Cote RP, Smolenaars T et al. Supporting pillars for industrial ecosystems. Journal of Cleaner Production 1997;1 2:67 74.
3. Chertow MR. Industrial symbiosis:literature and taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and Environment 2000;25:313 37.
4. Korhonen J. Four ecosystem principles for an industrial ecosystem. Journal of Cleaner Production 2001;9:253 9.
5. Ayres RU, Ayres LW. A handbook of industrial ecology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Ltd.; 2002.
6. Sterr T, Ott T. The industrial region as a promising unit for eco-industrial development reflections,practical experience and establishment of innovative instruments to support industrial ecology. Journal of Cleaner Production 2004;12: 947-965.
7. Chertow MR, Lombardi DW. Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms. Environmental Science & Technology 2005;39:6535 41.
8. van Beers D, Bossilkov A, Corder G, van Berkel R. Industrial symbiosis in the Australian Minerals Industry: the cases of Kwinana and Gladstone. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2007;11:55 72.
9. Dai T J, Lu Z W. Two indices for quantitative evaluation of eco-industrial park area. China Environmental Science, 2006;(5): 632-636.
10. Scott D M, Novak D C, Aultman-Hall L. Network robustness index: A new method for identifying critical links and evaluating the performance of transportation networks. Journal of Transport Geography 2006;14:215-227.
11. Church R, Scaparra M. Protecting critical assets: A stochastic model for risk management in global supply chain networks. Eur J Oper Res 2005; 69:412-420.
12. Motter A E, Lai Y C. Cascade-based attacks on complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 2002;66:65-102.
13. Pastor-Satorras R, Vazquez A, Vespignani A. Dynamical and correlation properties of the internet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001;87:258-701.
14. Guimera R, Arenas A, Diaz-Guilera A, et al. Dynamical properties of model communication networks. Phys. Rev. E 2002;66:26-704.
15. Watts D J. A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2002;99:5766-5771.