Effect of seismic sequences in reinforced concrete frame buildings located in soft-soil sites

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 63, Issue , 2014, Pages 56-68

  Ruiz García, Jorge ^a   Marín, Marco V ^a   Terán Gilmore, Amador ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD MICHOACANA DE SAN NICOLÁS DE HIDALGO   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA METROPOLITANA AZCAPOTZALCO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Aftershocks; Frequency content; Peak drift demands; Residual drift demands; Seismic sequences

Indexed keywords

CONCRETES; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOILS;

AFTERSHOCKS; DRIFT DEMANDS; FREQUENCY CONTENTS; RESIDUAL DRIFTS; SEISMIC SEQUENCE;

BUILDINGS;

CONCRETE STRUCTURE; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOFT SOIL; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

FEDERAL DISTRICT [MEXICO]; MEXICO CITY; MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA];

EID: 84898666587     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Rosenblueth E., Meli R. The 1985 Mexico earthquake: causes and effects in Mexico City. Concr Int (ACI) 1986, 8(5):23-34.
2. Meli R., Avila J.A. The Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985-analysis of building response. Earthq Spectra 1989, 5(1):1-18.
3. Ruiz-García J., Negrete-Manriquez J. Evaluation of drift demands in existing steel frames under as-recorded far-field and near-fault mainshock-aftershock seismic sequences. Eng Struct 2011, 33:621-634.
4. Ruiz-García J. Mainshock-aftershock ground motion features and their influence in building[U+05F3]s seismic response. J Earthq. Eng. 2012, 16(5):719-737.
5. Goda K., Taylor C. Effects of aftershocks on peak ductility demand due to strong ground motion records from shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2012, 41:2311-2330.
6. Mexican Strong Motion Dataset 1960-1999. Mexican Society of Seismic Engineering, A.C. http://www.unam.mx/db/spanish/pubesp.html.
7. Terán-Gilmore A. On the use of spectra to establish damage control in regular frames during global predesign. Earthq Spectra 2004, (3):995-1020.
8. Carr A.J. RUAUMOKO-inelastic dynamic analysis program. User[U+05F3]s manual 2004, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
9. Pantazopoulou S.J., French C.W. Slab participation in practical earthquake design of reinforced concrete frames. ACI Struct. J. 2001, 98(4):479-489.
10. Novelli V.I. The unloading stiffness of reinforced concrete members [Master[U+05F3]s thesis] 2008, Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia, Universita degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
11. Christopoulos C., Pampanin S., Priestley M.J.N. Performance-based seismic response of frame structures including residual deformations. Part I: single-degree of freedom systems. J Earthq Eng 2003, 7(1):97-118.
12. Dazio A. Residual displacements in capacity designed reinforced concrete structures. In: Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada; 2004.
13. Miranda E. Evaluation of site-dependent inelastic seismic design spectra. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 1993, 119(5):1319-1338.
14. Reinoso E., Ordaz M. Spectral ratios for Mexico City from free-field recordings. Earthq Spectra 1999, 15(2):273-275.
15. Terán-Gilmore A., Sanchez-Badillo A., Espinosa-Johnson M. Performance-based seismic design of reinforced concrete ductile buildings subjected to large energy demands. Earthq Struct 2010, 1(1):69-92.
16. Kunnath S.K., Reinhorn A.M., Park Y.J. Analytical modeling of inelastic seismic response of R/C structures. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 1990, 116:996-1017.
17. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report FEMA 356. Washington, D.C.; 2000.
18. McCormick J, Aburano H, Ikenaga M, Nakashima M. Permissible residual deformation levels for building structures considering both safety and human elements. In: Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Beijing, China, paper No. 05-06-0071; 2008.
19. Hachem MM, Mahin SA, Moehle JP. Performance of circular reinforced concrete bridge columns under bidirectional earthquake loading. PEER 2003/06. Technical report. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, California: University of California.
20. Yazgan U., Dazio A. Simulating maximum and residual displacements of RC structures: I. Accuracy. Earthq Spectra 2011, 25(4):1187-1202.
21. Bojórquez E., Ruiz-García J. Residual drift demands in moment-resisting steel frames subjected to narrow-band earthquake ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2013, 42(11):1583-1598.
22. Quiroz A., Arroyo D., Terán-Gilmore A., Ordaz M. Evaluation of the intensity measure approach in performance based earthquake engineering through the use of simulated ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2014, 104(2). (in press).