The DNA of socially responsible innovation: Social and natural scientists need to establish mutual understanding and a common language to efficiently work together

EMBO Reports

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 134-137

  Flipse, Steven M ^a   Van Der Sanden, Maarten C A ^a   Radstake, Maud ^b   De Winde, Johannes H ^c,d   Osseweijer, Patricia ^a,e  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b CSG Centre for Society and the Life Sciences   (Netherlands)

^c KLUYVER CENTRE FOR GENOMICS OF INDUSTRIAL FERMENTATION   (Netherlands)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e BE Basic   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICIST; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCIENTIST; SOCIOLOGY; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

EID: 84898666030     PISSN: 1469221X     EISSN: 14693178     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/embr.201337949     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Campbell JL, (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manage Rev 32: 946-967
2. Fisher E, Mahajan RL, Mitcham C, (2006) Midstream modulation of technology: governance from within. Bull Sci Technol Soc 26: 485-496
3. Editorial (2009) Mind the gap. Nature 462: 825-826
4. European Commission (2011) Horizon 2020-The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: 1-14
5. STIR (2012) Socio-technical integration research. Available at http://cns.asu.edu/research/stir. Accessed 30 September 2013
6. Van der Burg S, (2009) Imagining the future of photoacoustic mammography. Sci Eng Ethics 15: 97-110
7. Doorn N, Fahlquist JN, (2010) Responsibility in engineering: toward a new role for engineering ethics. Bull Sci Technol Soc 30: 222-230
8. Snow CP, (1959) The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
9. Van der Sanden MCA, Meijman F, (2008) Dialogue guides awareness and understanding of science: an essay on different goals of dialogue leading to different science communication approaches. Public Understand Sci 17: 89-103
10. Radstake M, Van den Heuvel-Vromans E, Jeucken N, Dortmans K, Nelis A, (2009) Societal dialogue needs more than public engagement. EMBO Rep 10: 313-317
11. Flipse SM, Van der Sanden MCA, Osseweijer P, (2013) Improving industrial R&D practices with social and ethical aspects: aligning key performance indicators with social and ethical aspects in food technology R&D. Technol Forecast Soc DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.009
12. Stegmaier P, (2009) The rock 'n' roll of knowledge co-production. EMBO Rep 10: 114-119
13. Van Merkerk RO, Smits REHM, (2008) Tailoring CTA for emerging technologies. Technol Forecast Soc 75: 312-333 (Pubitemid 351722662)
14. Radstake M, Penders B, (2007) Inside genomics: the interdisciplinary faces of ELSA. Gradu J Soc Sci 4: 4-10
15. Shelley-Egan C, (2010) The ambivalence of promising technology. Nanoethics 4: 183-189
16. Smits R, Leyten J, Den Hartog P, (1995) Technology assessment and technology policy in Europe: new concepts, new goals, new infrastructures. Policy Sci 28: 271-299
17. Penders B, Verbakel JMA, Nelis A, (2009) The social study of corporate science: a research Manifesto. Bull Sci Technol Soc 29: 439-446
18. Flipse SM, Van der Sanden MCA, Osseweijer P, (2013) Setting up spaces for collaboration in industry between researchers from the natural and social sciences. Sci Eng Ethics DOI 10.1007/s11948-013-9434-7