Correction: Culprit vessel only versus multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (PLoS ONE (2014) 9, 3 (e92316) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092316);Culprit vessel only versus multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Zhang, Dongfeng ^a   Song, Xiantao ^a   Lv, Shuzheng ^a   Yuan, Fei ^a   Xu, Feng ^a   Zhang, Min ^a   Li, Wei ^a   Yan, Shuai ^a  

^a CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CULPRIT PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY DYSFUNCTION; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; MULTIVESSEL DISEASE; MULTIVESSEL PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; VASCULAR DISEASE; AGED; BLOOD VESSEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; KIDNEY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD VESSELS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84898638800     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101073     Document Type: Erratum

References (24)

1. Sorajja P, Gersh BJ, Cox DA, McLaughlin MG, Zimetbaum P, et al. (2007) Impact of multivessel disease on reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 28: 1709-1716. (Pubitemid 47227095)
2. Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, et al. (2012) ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 33: 2569-2619.
3. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, et al. (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 58: e44-e122.
4. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, et al. (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283: 2008-2012. (Pubitemid 30214957)
5. Di Mario C, Mara S, Flavio A, Imad S, Antonio M, et al. (2004) Single vs multivessel treatment during primary angioplasty: results of the multicentre randomised HEpacoat for cuLPrit or multivessel stenting for Acute Myocardial Infarction (HELP AMI) Study. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 6: 128-133. (Pubitemid 39665427)
6. Ochala A, Smolka GA, Wojakowski W, Dudek D, Dziewierz A, et al. (2004) The function of the left ventricle after complete multivessel one-stage percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Invasive Cardiol 16: 699-702.
7. Politi L, Sgura F, Rossi R, Monopoli D, Guerri E, et al. (2010) A randomised trial of target-vessel versus multi-vessel revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: major adverse cardiac events during long-term follow-up. Heart 96: 662-667.
8. Wald DS, Morris JK, Wald NJ, Chase AJ, Edwards RJ, et al. (2013) Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 369: 1115-1123.
9. Abe D, Sato A, Hoshi T, Takeyasu N, Misaki M, et al. (2013) Initial culprit-only versus initial multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Ibaraki Cardiovascular Assessment Study registry. Heart Vessels.
10. Bauer T, Zeymer U, Hochadel M, Mollmann H, Weidinger F, et al. (2013) Prima-vista multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in haemodynamically stable patients with acute coronary syndromes: analysis of over 4.400 patients in the EHS-PCI registry. Int J Cardiol 166: 596-600.
11. Cavender MA, Milford-Beland S, Roe MT, Peterson ED, Weintraub WS, et al. (2009) Prevalence, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of non-infarct artery intervention during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry). Am J Cardiol 104: 507-513.
12. Corpus RA, House JA, Marso SP, Grantham JA, Huber KJ, et al. (2004) Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease and acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 148: 493-500. (Pubitemid 39265124)
13. Dziewierz A, Siudak Z, Rakowski T, Zasada W, Dubiel JS, et al. (2010) Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease and noninfarct-related artery revascularization on outcome of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the EUROTRANSFER Registry). Am J Cardiol 106: 342-347.
14. Hannan EL, Samadashvili Z, Walford G, Holmes DJ, Jacobs AK, et al. (2010) Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3: 22-31.
15. Jensen LO, Thayssen P, Farkas DK, Hougaard M, Terkelsen CJ, et al. (2012) Culprit only or multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. EuroIntervention 8: 456-464.
16. Khattab AA, Abdel-Wahab M, Rother C, Liska B, Toelg R, et al. (2008) Multivessel stenting during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. A single-center experience. Clin Res Cardiol 97: 32-38.
17. Kornowski R, Mehran R, Dangas G, Nikolsky E, Assali A, et al. (2011) Prognostic impact of staged versus ''one-time'' multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONSAMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 58: 704-711.
18. Mohamad T, Bernal JM, Kondur A, Hari P, Nelson K, et al. (2011) Coronary revascularization strategy for ST elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: experience and results at 1-year follow-up. Am J Ther 18: 92-100.
19. Qarawani D, Nahir M, Abboud M, Hazanov Y, Hasin Y (2008) Culprit only versus complete coronary revascularization during primary PCI. Int J Cardiol 123: 288-292. (Pubitemid 350302021)
20. Roe MT, Cura FA, Joski PS, Garcia E, Guetta V, et al. (2001) Initial experience with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention during mechanical reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 88: 170-173, A6.
21. Toma M, Buller CE, Westerhout CM, Fu Y, O'Neill WW, et al. (2010) Nonculprit coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention during acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the APEX-AMI trial. Eur Heart J 31: 1701-1707.
22. Varani E, Balducelli M, Aquilina M, Vecchi G, Hussien MN, et al. (2008) Single or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 72: 927-933.
23. Widimsky P, Holmes DJ (2011) How to treat patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease? Eur Heart J 32: 396-403.
24. Vlaar PJ, Mahmoud KD, Holmes DJ, van Valkenhoef G, Hillege HL, et al. (2011) Culprit vessel only versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pairwise and network meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 58: 692-703.